Think how bad Purdue would be if they couldn’t shoot? Painter has done a great job, but that job was made a lot easier because he has several guys who are really good shooters. Just watch what they’re doing to Villanova right now and it’s mainly because they’ve drained 9 3 pointers in the first half and are shooting over 50% from outside.
Really, what kind of coaching guru loses 12 of 13, it's pretty f'n hard to suck that bad … i.e., give him his obligatory year to "turn it around" and move on.
Let's give credit where credit's due … we suck, (yes our JV win streak and prize rolls forward)and they, without any expectations this year just completely humiliated the defending champ.
I don't care … $3.5 million a year … figure it the **** out … Painter has.
Just so it can be said again...IT'S SHOOTING, NOT COACHING!. Maybe a lack of toughness too, maybe they need more desire....but if they could shoot better, we'd be in the real tourney right now and not in one that absolutely no one cares about, except maybe they players...
Say what you want. We’re sitting at home for the 2nd straight year.
Speaking of blathering nonsense, you might check who they played in the early stretch versus who they played when they lost 12 of 13. Settling of less doesn’t mean you get to just make stuff up. Why would you defend losing 12 of 13, just another new IU fan?
STFU, atzeratua.... and make sure to wear your drool bib and plastic helmet today.
When is Archie receiving his National COY trophy that you assured everyone he would win this year?
Back on track and out of the tournament...again?
Purdue is in the Sweet 16 with all of their talent. Meanwhile we’re at home with 2 all conference players and 8 4 or 5 star recruits.
You've already shown that you make snap judgements which aren't always accurate. Your evaluation of the situation is suspect.
I give him credit for the wins. But the problem is there’s isn’t enough of them. This isn’t complicated.
