That would be normal.In the sense that they would approve them, maybe. I doubt the Trustees are initiating pay raises for anyone except the President.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That would be normal.In the sense that they would approve them, maybe. I doubt the Trustees are initiating pay raises for anyone except the President.
Unless Dolson is trusted enough to just get rubber stamp treatment...any group of critical thinkers would raise many of the same questions we all have had about that raise.In the sense that they would approve them, maybe. I doubt the Trustees are initiating pay raises for anyone except the President.
I don't know how they work either but Dolson is in charge of the organization that earns the money that pays the coaches. They may just defer to his judgement as long as the money is there. Athletics is a separate self-sustaining enterprise, Woodson's salary doesn't come out of tuition or foundation money.Unless Dolson is trusted enough to just get rubber stamp treatment...any group of critical thinkers would raise many of the same questions we all have had about that raise.
Maybe he does have that trust? Maybe Buckner's role made it much easier?
I just know how raises are usually scrutinized in my profession, and I can't fathom getting Woody's pushed through on merit alone. There would have had to be some sort of position change involved, elevating the role of HC to a higher spot in the org chart, revenue sharing of some sort...etc...
Very possible its handled differently for them though, obviously.
More than any other IU team, this reminds me of the Noah Vonleh season.I just can’t see how we aren’t SOOO far off.
This is our worst team since Crean’s rebuild, and he didn’t have three 5*s in those teams.
Maybe if someone gave me an example of a far off team I will get it.
just as with Beard and Drew, it doesn’t matter what the overall fanbase thinks about Pearl, either as a coach or as a person.I really think in Woody's mind he is going about it the right way but in reality it's not working. He can use injuries and kids not living up tp potential all he wants but the fact is his bench was weak, he got no great guard from the portal, X and Galloway have been like yoyos. Galloway can dish but then does little scoring or vice versa. Never a consistent player-- much like Fletcher at PU. Leal can shoot but I don't think they utilize him in that way. Woody isn't going to change his style no matter how much fans would like him too. He is stubborn and feels it is on his players and not him. Uses the same cliches after every loss.The only way IU moves up and consistent is a complete overhaul of this coaching staff. They were supposed to be such great recruiters but other than Mgbako and one guy in 25', they haven't proved that. This team and coaches are far from IU standard. I don't care how many do not like Bruce Pearl at least has proven himself at every place he coached.
Well, not sure anybody thought he was a long term solution. I think his first two years were positive and helped establish IU again to a certain point. At least make us relevant again, but clearly a step back this year. If his tenure ended at the end of the year, I would say we are better off overall from having him as our coach. If he comes back another year and shits the bed, it probably becomes a wash and was wasted time.In my opinion, its obvious Woody isn't the long term answer for IU. But could he be an effective bridge to that long term solution? Right now, its not looking great. But my main point is he's likely not as far off from being an effective bridge for another couple years, than it seems right now. And all it would take is awareness and willingness of the need to change some things.
Heck...find the MOST successful D2/D3/NAIA younger coach and bring him in for a couple years as a lead assistant. Tonegal at IWU, Moore at Grace, and/or whoever the top young D2/D3 coaches are that have shown consistent success as a coach and program builder. Bring in a couple of those guys as assistant coaches.
Nothing else has worked the last 30 years.
I just worry about canning Woody and moving to "the next guy" as an approach. Watching May's team get down by 25 to South Florida, by playing sloppy, uninspired basketball...looked familiar. Watching and seeing Beard's Ole Miss teams not able to beat ranked teams, or largely even be competitive with them...looks familiar. Seeing my main candidate, Matta's Butler team get destroyed at home to Creighton...looks familiar. Schertz at ISU losing 2 games after getting ranked...
I have no doubt those guys are better college coaches than Woody is, but are they THE long term answer?
Again...my premise on keeping him revolves around him seeing his shortcomings, and being open to fixing them. THAT is something worth prolonging, in my opinion...if only for another year or two.
Not at all when the head of the board is an aggressively ardent supporter of the coach.This, I think, bolsters my belief that there was more to the raise than purely performance.
When you start adding more people in to the decision, you add more people that would question THAT level of raise for what Woody did...only 2 short years after Dolson would have had to lay out the case for hiring Woody in the first place, and getting the o.k. for his contract.
Can you imagine any sort of CFO, or accountant, o.k.ing that level of raise...many, many times greater than already included performance incentives...for a guy that fell short of many of those performance incentives?
I've tried to negotiate raises for employees...to say they're heavily scrutinized for merit is an understatement.
That would be normal.
Actually athletics have been taking infusions from the university for some time and the IU foundation gifted them $38 million for the pandemic period. CMW’s salary is reported in the State Budget report along with other employees. Dolson reports to the prez who reports to the board and can’t imagine that he would give a coach a $1 mil raise in a vacuum.I don't know how they work either but the Dolson is in charge of the organization that earns the money that pays the coaches. They may just defer to his judgement as long as the money is there. Athletics is a separate self-sustaining enterprise, Woodson's salary doesn't come out of tuition or foundation money.
Part of my wariness to part ways with him this year. Even the guys I’ve said are can’t miss guys, Matta and Beard, aren’t exactly setting the world on fire lately. With both of those guys, specifically, I think you trust their overall body of work, and either would be worth that risk. But I would not make that move for May, Schertz, etc…Well, not sure anybody thought he was a long term solution. I think his first two years were positive and helped establish IU again to a certain point. At least make us relevant again, but clearly a step back this year. If his tenure ended at the end of the year, I would say we are better off overall from having him as our coach. If he comes back another year and shits the bed, it probably becomes a wash and was wasted time.
Next year is the key, with or without him. And if we are moving on, we had better not do it for another “might” be a great coach at IU. We had better have a top 5-10 coach lined up.
After the first two years, I thought much like Dolson. Woody had a marginal first year due to injuries. Last year was a step up in the BT. Woody had inserted us in national recruiting with who he brought in.Dull Son’s victory lap on IUBB when he gave Woody that undeserved $1M raise indicates he doesn’t have much of a pulse on where the program is going.
Dull Son seven months ago: "Coach Woodson immediately re-inserted our program into the national conversation both in terms of an elevated level of success on the court and in recruiting. I believe under Coach Woodson's leadership, we have positioned the program to compete at the highest levels in recruiting, which in turn will enable us to compete at the highest levels within the Big Ten and in the NCAA Tournament."
lol
Dittos. At the beginning of the season I thought we had a shot — unranked but some good talent coming in (though no shooters). Recruiting had a possible megaclass. Like you said not worth a raise but some momentum was in program.After the first two years, I thought much like Dolson. Woody had a marginal first year due to injuries. Last year was a step up in the BT. Woody had inserted us in national recruiting with who he brought in.
IMO, it wasn't worth an extra MIL and then we have this CF of a year. I was prepared for another step up this year but....
Hindsight is always 20/20.
Big picture, in a best case scenario where Woodson returns next season, how do you envision this all plays out over the next 5-10 years? Because to me, if I am the AD, any decision is made with short term in mind, but eyes on the future.Part of my wariness to part ways with him this year. Even the guys I’ve said are can’t miss guys, Matta and Beard, aren’t exactly setting the world on fire lately. With both of those guys, specifically, I think you trust their overall body of work, and either would be worth that risk. But I would not make that move for May, Schertz, etc…
I would expect we could add 5 max. It would be very difficult to bring in multiple players at the same position from the portal.I think you are way overly optimistic about this roster basically returning intact next season. It is clear to me these guys don’t enjoy playing together. I would guess, at minimum, Woodson is going to have to add 5-6 guys in the portal this Spring.
I arrived at that number thinking the following:I would expect we could add 5 max. It would be very difficult to bring in multiple players at the same position from the portal.
And I doubt Sparks will stay if they get another center out of the portal. He might think those 2 years at BSU where he was the man were a lot more fun than this.I arrived at that number thinking the following:
Johnson out of eligibility
Walker out of eligibility
Ware to the NBA
Mgbako tries the G League
Banks to the portal
Gunn to the portal
Not predicting all this, but certainly not unthinkable. We have an open scholarship already and only McNeeley committed. Newton hopefully is 100% for next season.
“Somehow” @ $4 million-plus per year is…kind of expensive
Yep. Lots of talent, nothing to show for it at season’s end.More than any other IU team, this reminds me of the Noah Vonleh season.
Best case…Big picture, in a best case scenario where Woodson returns next season, how do you envision this all plays out over the next 5-10 years? Because to me, if I am the AD, any decision is made with short term in mind, but eyes on the future.
How does only having Woodson maybe another year or 2 affect recruiting? Does that matter at this point?Best case…
Woodson does make some changes to his style. He does bring in an assistant to help him with building fundamental things in his program. And he gets IU back to the NCAA tournament next year and maybe coaches 1 year after.
Then Woodson retires, and by then someone like May, Schertz, or a different younger coach establishes themselves similarly to what Stevens did at Butler. And the timing works out this time to hire a guy like that.
They inherit an already good and relevant IU program, and take it to the next level. And IU becomes a program like Kansas has been the last 15-20 years.
Depends on his approach I would say. My “Woody is back isn’t the end of the world” scenario implies he’d change his style of play and his approach. He’s shown an ability to land high level wings and bigs the last couple cycles. And before his style was in question, he got JHS.How does only having Woodson maybe another year or 2 affect recruiting? Does that matter at this point?
Ha ha. Well… Getting over that hump finally would be something.
Best case…
Woodson does make some changes to his style. He does bring in an assistant to help him with building fundamental things in his program. And he gets IU back to the NCAA tournament next year and maybe coaches 1 year after.
Then Woodson retires, and by then someone like May, Schertz, or a different younger coach establishes themselves similarly to what Stevens did at Butler. And the timing works out this time to hire a guy like that.
They inherit an already good and relevant IU program, and take it to the next level. And IU becomes a program like Kansas has been the last 15-20 years.
Note that I was asked what I saw as a “best case” by keeping Woody.AMAZINGLY optimistic but I hope, I pray you have a blueprint here that is followed!
If we all should have learned anything by now…Dolson doesn’t live by this boards consensus timelines. Both his major firings have come earlier than the board consensus.As much as anything I’ve ever seen posted around here in 20+ years, this thread is telling. If our fanbase is even remotely close to the fervor shown here, next year is going to be a s-storm of biblical proportions. Woody and his merry men of sneakers and crack recruiters better get on a roll reminiscent of 1975. Otherwise, the Woody era will be deemed a colossal failure and he’ll have tarnished his good name beyond repair.
North is trying his damnedest to give a sliver of sunshine in the case of a woody survival. It’s virtually unanimous we aren’t having any of that. Dolson either made a mess in his pants or Buckner forced him to OD on a laxative. Either way, someone has to clean it up.
2nd Round of NCAA, next year, would have to be seen as a positive after this year...I would think. Obviously how the regular season would go, the seed, etc... would also factor in.I am sure there are many fans who will see a tournament appearance, or even making it to the second round, as sufficient performance for MW.
This current debate is pretty much a time warp of the Archie 3rd year debate. Similar arguments and even many of the same people.
At his age, he was never a long term hire. Given that, and the available choices of who might replace him, I can see Dolson deciding to wait another year or two, i.e. stick closer to his original expected timeline on needing to replace Woodson, and see how things evolve. Especially if Woodson has indicated to him a willingness to make some changes to address the obvious things.2nd Round of NCAA, next year, would have to be seen as a positive after this year...I would think. Obviously how the regular season would go, the seed, etc... would also factor in.
But good points, the inevitability does seem similar to Archie's tenure.
I'm just trying to provide some framework stuff where Woody gets another year or two, and it ends up working out for IU. Because I think its incredibly unlikely he's fired after this year...despite there being a strong case for it.
Good thread, and I’ve seen passing references to what is most on my mind: Building a program versus building a team.
Even in @IUNorth ’s OP, it’s (paraphrased);
Woodson show some desire to change (and follow through on it), bring in some help, load up on the portal, teach some stuff (improve fundamentals) , and voila: We are much better next year. Maybe that buys us two years out of MW, then he can walk away with a smoother transition, leave on his terms, etc.
The assumption is that the program would be much better off at the end of those 2 years than when he took over?
My questions:
A). Is this true? Or, is loading up on the portal just building a team (short term) versus building from the ground up, a program (long term)? In the above scenario who will want to be recruited to play here and help build a program/culture?
B) there’s this idea that we pull the trigger only if we get a can’t miss, elite coach with an established college coaching record. What if that isn’t an option? I don’t need to hear a list of people that fans would like, who is there that would take the job???
Imho, we need to completely overhaul our program, and our culture with an eye towards the future. Clearly MW isn’t any part of that, he’s a bridge at best. But back to “B”, a bridge to what type of program and who?
I think that’s the biggest question.
Yep. I see the names thrown around and many of them just don’t seem worth it. This admin can’t afford to **** up another BB hirePart of my wariness to part ways with him this year. Even the guys I’ve said are can’t miss guys, Matta and Beard, aren’t exactly setting the world on fire lately. With both of those guys, specifically, I think you trust their overall body of work, and either would be worth that risk. But I would not make that move for May, Schertz, etc…
Building a team equals winning. Building a program equals winning consistently. Wins build both ...Good thread, and I’ve seen passing references to what is most on my mind: Building a program versus building a team.
Agreed, and that’s similar to what I said. The who will determine the what.If IU hires the RIGHT guy then all questions are answered. He will overhaul the program and install his culture.
IMO, IU doesn't change the culture the coach does.
Look at what was done when RMK was brought in! It was the Hurrying Hoosiers and boom, now it is the defensive Hoosiers. As Norman said, "Leave the ball, would you George".
Not saying that is what you said but....
Yeah, I thought of that. My parents went to State and my dad (who living with athletes) is always talking to me about a broken culture that exists there , and it goes beyond basketball- or maybe I should say there is a university culture that has seeped down and also affected b-ball.Building a team equals winning. Building a program equals winning consistently. Wins build both ...
MSU and it's long line of rapists murderers and thugs at a school where gymnasts were getting sexually molested .. is not a good culture, it's the antithesis of a good culture, the only reason they are mentioned as such is because of the above.
You left out periodic arrests, but otherwise accurate.Yeah, I thought of that. My parents went to State and my dad (who living with athletes) is always talking to me about a broken culture that exists there , and it goes beyond basketball- or maybe I should say there is a university culture that has seeped down and also affected b-ball.
However, I will say that the basketball program does have an identity and culture*. insofar as style of play. It does seem that the team over the last 25 or so years has a style, tough, rebounding, defense, etc
Edit: *perhaps winning culture, which you stated.
Right, but not just in basketball-seems to be a problem there.You left out periodic arrests, but otherwise accurate.
My answers...Good thread, and I’ve seen passing references to what is most on my mind: Building a program versus building a team.
Even in @IUNorth ’s OP, it’s (paraphrased);
Woodson show some desire to change (and follow through on it), bring in some help, load up on the portal, teach some stuff (improve fundamentals) , and voila: We are much better next year. Maybe that buys us two years out of MW, then he can walk away with a smoother transition, leave on his terms, etc.
The assumption is that the program would be much better off at the end of those 2 years than when he took over?
My questions:
A). Is this true? Or, is loading up on the portal just building a team (short term) versus building from the ground up, a program (long term)? In the above scenario who will want to be recruited to play here and help build a program/culture?
B) there’s this idea that we pull the trigger only if we get a can’t miss, elite coach with an established college coaching record. What if that isn’t an option? I don’t need to hear a list of people that fans would like, who is there that would take the job???
Imho, we need to completely overhaul our program, and our culture with an eye towards the future. Clearly MW isn’t any part of that, he’s a bridge at best. But back to “B”, a bridge to what type of program and who?
I think that’s the biggest question.
But I do think that some thought on style of play, pace of play, types of players we want, etc... should be had, discussed, etc... by Dolson and whoever else is making the hiring decision.