In Art of the Deal, Trump claims his family came over from Sweden. Of course that was a lie. Extra credit for you if you can explain why that lie is better.Just an honest question (TIC).... I thought since the Dems had a resident expert on the Native American that she could shed some light.... I hope they aren’t suggesting she isn’t a Native American? That to me is what would be embarrassing....you know.....if she wasn’t.
Never read Art of The Deal....In Art of the Deal, Trump claims his family came over from Sweden. Of course that was a lie. Extra credit for you if you can explain why that lie is better.
JDB is not a fan of Mooslums, the blacks, and it wouldn’t surprise me if he has a slight beef with Asians. That’s how he rolls.
Not Asian women. He has a touch of yellow fever though I cant fault him there.
Oh yeah, stupid me. Yesterday's deaths and the disproportional, heavy-handed responses by the Israelis had nothing to do with the opening of the Embassy.
All a big coincidence. All a misunderstanding since there was nothing significant about the move of some US office/workers they have been talking about for decades.
JDB -- by downplaying the losses, you have basically sub-humanised the lives of the Palestinians -- something that the Nazis did to the Jews back in WW2.
Think about it -- political symbolism matters more than the senseless, avoidable loss of lives including children and women. That's how bad folks rationalise their actions too.
LOL, the equivalence of shooting at violent protesters and rioters that have tried to breach borders and harm your soldiers is now the same as being dragged from your home unarmed by the Gestapo? I can't wait to see how you did on analogies in standardized tests.
MSNBC is spinning Palestinian violence as peaceful protest.
This type of crap is not journalism, it is just incitement. Moreover, it is spreading propaganda being generated by a criminal ruling clique that is knowingly sending out its citizens and followers to be killed or wounded to make a point. But it is MSNBC so what do you really expect?
MSNBC is spinning Palestinian violence as peaceful protest.
This type of crap is not journalism, it is just incitement. Moreover, it is spreading propaganda being generated by a criminal ruling clique that is knowingly sending out its citizens and followers to be killed or wounded to make a point. But it is MSNBC so what do you really expect?
60 Palestinians dead, 2700 injured.
ZERO Israelis injured.
You have your blinkers on.
This is today's Sharpeville Massacre.
Uh, Iran has stated they are not pulling out. So what’s your point? Let the EU run the deal. Lead from behind. Remember?Good thing we have in place an agreement that would prevent Iran from acting on what you think are its ambitions. Oh. Wait. No, we don't have that anymore.
Uh, Iran has stated they are not pulling out. So what’s your point? Let the EU run the deal. Lead from behind. Remember?
Errr... I dont get the logic. By lifting the sanctions, their nuclear efforts were contained for at least 10-15 years. And so no nuclear bombs.
So you are now suggesting that we do a regime change to then to ensure that the new bosses don't build them also?
But its the new boss, same as the old boss scenario isnt it?
If you make a little bit of effort, Google is your friend... just sayin'
The (Shah of) Iran had a nuclear program too with the help of the US going back as far back to the 50s. Why did the US help the Shah of Iran when they actually had the 3rd largest oil reserves in the world then?
Anyone who thinks they want it (then) for "peaceful purposes" is naive.
FYI. Iranian oil fields are pretty mature now.
Secondly, the money 'given' to the Iranians were actually their money that the US had frozen.
Wait, why would you care if they are pulling out or not? It’s the worst deal ever and Iran wasn’t following it anyways, remember?
I’m so glad you brought up “lead from behind”. That’s one of my favorite sayings you little lemmings have and it’s been a while. Thank you for that.
If they are the violent party, they must be extremely bad at it considering that 60 of them have died and 2700 injured -- whilst there have been zero Israeli injuries. Self-inflicted injuries?
Stones versus live bullets.
Just so you know: The scary brown people who practice terrorism against us (al Qaeda, ISIS, et al.) are radical Sunnis. Since Iran is a Shiite country, the people trying to attack us hate Iran as much or more than they hate us.Do any of you pro Iran Nuke deal believers deny that the removal of sanctions and payment of $$$ is fueling ongoing terrorism in the Middle East and around the world?
Iran completely outsmarted us, period. The sanctions were choking the life out of their government. Their objective was to get the sanctions lifted. They new our POTUS was desperate for a Foreign policy win and conned us beautifully. The day after the agreement was announced (but never signed) they publically stated that they would import any weapons systems they wanted. They could buy or steal nukes from Russia, China, NK or others. They didn’t have the delivery systems. Why didn’t we include them in the deal? Because they were smarter than us the they knew how badly we wanted a deal before Pres Obama left office. Bad Bad deal.
Just so you know: The scary brown people who practice terrorism against us (al Qaeda, ISIS, et al.) are radical Sunnis. Since Iran is a Shiite country, the people trying to attack us hate Iran as much or more than they hate us.
Iran presents virtually no threat to us. It threatens others in the Middle East like Israel and Saudi Arabia. When we view Iran through Israel’s eyes, we lose track of our own interests. The Israeli tail wags the American dog.
But at least you’ve finally lurched uncontrollably into the truth. Opponents of the Iran deal don’t care whether it stymies Iran’s nuclear ambitions. They want a war with Iran, so they oppose any agreement with Iran. Any deal is a bad deal from this perspective.
Just so you know: The scary brown people who practice terrorism against us (al Qaeda, ISIS, et al.) are radical Sunnis. Since Iran is a Shiite country, the people trying to attack us hate Iran as much or more than they hate us.
Iran presents virtually no threat to us. It threatens others in the Middle East like Israel and Saudi Arabia. When we view Iran through Israel’s eyes, we lose track of our own interests. The Israeli tail wags the American dog.
But at least you’ve finally lurched uncontrollably into the truth. Opponents of the Iran deal don’t care whether it stymies Iran’s nuclear ambitions. They want a war with Iran, so they oppose any agreement with Iran. Any deal is a bad deal from this perspective.
They had ears.....they just didn’t use them. As Obama said, elections have consequences. What he meant by that was “sorry republicans, I’m president of the Dems. You have no say.”Even if the deal was bad, was it worse than selling Iran anti-tank weapons as a previous administration did? It seems strange that many conservatives did not criticize that administration.
You guys need to get your stories straight. If Iran harbors no nuclear ambitions, then there’s no risk that Iran will evade the inspections regime, and these baseless claims of Iranian cheating are revealed as a steaming load of bullshit. The main problem with the JCPOA from this perspective isn't that it isn't sufficiently rigorous about Iran's nuclear program, but that it doesn't lead to regime change in Iran.I was responding to Rock who was implying that there was no deal so they would go back to development. Their indication that they would stay in really validates the point that what they really wanted all along was relief from sanctions. Of course we gave them a nice $$$$$$$$ bonus too!! How good is that!!
Finally, I didn’t coin the term “Lead from behind”. The prior administration did but then denied it.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/27/who-really-said-obama-was-leading-from-behind/
They haven't pulled out yet, but they're now justified in doing it whenever they want. Instead of isolating Iran, we're isolating ourselves.Uh, Iran has stated they are not pulling out. So what’s your point? Let the EU run the deal. Lead from behind. Remember?
They took hostages for 444 days I believe..... do you really think they concern themselves with justification?They haven't pulled out yet, but they're now justified in doing it whenever they want. Instead of isolating Iran, we're isolating ourselves.
They had ears.....they just didn’t use them. As Obama said, elections have consequences. What he meant by that was “sorry republicans, I’m president of the Dems. You have no say.”
Reagan gave them a cake too.Who had ears, Obama for his deal or Reagan for selling them anti-tank weapons?
You guys need to get your stories straight. If Iran harbors no nuclear ambitions, then there’s no risk that Iran will evade the inspections regime, and these baseless claims of Iranian cheating are revealed as a steaming load of bullshit. The main problem with the JCPOA from this perspective isn't that it isn't sufficiently rigorous about Iran's nuclear program, but that it doesn't lead to regime change in Iran.
We knocked off one of Israel's arch-enemies in Iraq. Having learned nothing from that disaster, the same people now urge that we act against Israel's other arch-enemy Iran. At what point will American foreign policy prioritize America's interests rather than Israel's?
Hmm, Marie Antoinette diplomacy.
I was speaking of Obama.... 80’s I would have to think about...Who had ears, Obama for his deal or Reagan for selling them anti-tank weapons?
I was speaking of Obama.... 80’s I would have to think about...Who had ears, Obama for his deal or Reagan for selling them anti-tank weapons?
Turkey's Erdogan accuses Israel of Genocide.
I was responding to Rock who was implying that there was no deal so they would go back to development. Their indication that they would stay in really validates the point that what they really wanted all along was relief from sanctions. Of course we gave them a nice $$$$$$$$ bonus too!! How good is that!!
Finally, I didn’t coin the term “Lead from behind”. The prior administration did but then denied it.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/27/who-really-said-obama-was-leading-from-behind/
Just so you know: The scary brown people who practice terrorism against us (al Qaeda, ISIS, et al.) are radical Sunnis. Since Iran is a Shiite country, the people trying to attack us hate Iran as much or more than they hate us.
Iran presents virtually no threat to us. It threatens others in the Middle East like Israel and Saudi Arabia. When we view Iran through Israel’s eyes, we lose track of our own interests. The Israeli tail wags the American dog.
But at least you’ve finally lurched uncontrollably into the truth. Opponents of the Iran deal don’t care whether it stymies Iran’s nuclear ambitions. They want a war with Iran, so they oppose any agreement with Iran. Any deal is a bad deal from this perspective.
You woke up to what conservatives have know for decades .....they are your clone but they aren’t afraid to say it publicly right now. They will lose and be forced back under ground but it is interesting at the moment.I wake up on the wrong side of bed and find my clone
I have always believed this. If the Palestinians got rid of their terrorist government and asked Israel to make them part of Israel then Israel would embrace them. There are a lot of Muslims living in Israel today. Many even serve in elected office. This would be the best thing for everyone. Then the President's plan to help Palestine with their economy can really take off. They can focus upon life instead of focusing on death which is what they have been doing since the days of Yasser Arafat who once said,"Peace for us means the destruction of Israel. We are preparing for an all-out war, a war which will last for generations."Gaza violence: Israel defends actions as 55 Palestinians killed
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-44116340
One life wasted is too many. What a terrible tragedy. Palestinians have nowhere to go now. US doesn't give a feck, Israel doesn't give a feck, the Arab world doesn't give a feck.
They will be further driven into organisations like Hamas who will monetise the martyrs. What a fecking clusterfeck.
No, they wouldn't. Israeli leaders fear Jews becoming a minority, so the one-state solution is almost unanimously rejected. Even those who purport to support annexation of Palestinian areas and granting of citizenship to Palestinians limit themselves to the West Bank (which they view as historically part of Israel), and don't want to include Gaza, in order to ensure a Jewish majority.I have always believed this. If the Palestinians got rid of their terrorist government and asked Israel to make them part of Israel then Israel would embrace them. There are a lot of Muslims living in Israel today. Many even serve in elected office. This would be the best thing for everyone. Then the President's plan to help Palestine with their economy can really take off. They can focus upon life instead of focusing on death which is what they have been doing since the days of Yasser Arafat who once said,"Peace for us means the destruction of Israel. We are preparing for an all-out war, a war which will last for generations."