What tactics? You call me names. What did I say that was untrue? I acknowledge titles. I've acknowledged in previous posts about 2002. I said IU hasn't won a title in 30 years. Exactly what have I said that upset you enough to call me names? I've said that IU's heritage is real. I was talking about basketball not football so my question has not been answered.
How many times have you brought up this topic?
I'm not upset, I'm just mocking you. Big difference. No PU fan can upset me cause they hold nothing that I value. What is the difference between hoops and football? How to determine a blue blood in football is no different from hoops. You have to win national ships, conference ships, and other factors such as fan base, icons in the sport (such as Aseembly Hall & the Big house), and other tangible measurements. Timeline does not move once you achieved the results and Blue a blood status that IU hoops and UM football achieved years ago. That status stays with you forever, whether you like it or not. You are just trying to pick a fight. I understand it's hard for you to understand being a PU fan and all, but give it a rest. As DD says often, PU fans are either too dumb to understand or are too prideful to admit IU is elite. This debate is so old, and the only topic PU fan want to revisit. I recall the 2002 F4 run and PU fans at my office saying "IU fans think they are elite now". News flash, that status never went away and may never go away.
Last, I did not call you names. I just stereotyped you into the group you are portraying. If you want to act like a big boy and not little PU fan boy, don't bring up a question that you know may offend your target audience. I don't go to GBI and say "Your program is worthless. You are 9th best program in the BIG. Your program tends to only receive scraps left over by the better programs." No, I would not do that nor would I expect you to continue to ask about the Blueblood topic on this site.
Last edited: