No, only web site's that are questionable.Has anyone seen any credible report about Putin having a heart attack?
The Ukrainians hit the leading IFV with a drone, separating the infantry from the armor.Meat grinder.
This is an excellent example of a source of misinformation that is unquestioned, believed, and shared on the WC. I’d say about 90% of what a few posters on this board believe about some topics here on the WC is as bogus as this was. It’s wise to assume just about everything posted by dbm and ftw is false for that reason - and they’re only two examples of several posters that are essentially living in an alternate reality.How a baseless claim about Putin’s health spread from an unreliable Telegram account to TV news
An unverified claim that Russian President Vladimir Putin had suffered a heart attack is being amplified by news outlets and social media around the globe this week.apnews.com
The Ukrainians hit the leading IFV with a drone, separating the infantry from the armor.
18 months into the war and this is what happens. The mine roller tank reached a tree line…turned around and went home.I honestly didn't see much to learn from there from a US perspective. This deep in the war I would expect us to have air superiority over the battlefield and any armored column like that would get the treatment the Iraqis got trying to get out of Kuwait 30 years ago.
The ONLY deterrent the Russians have is CBRN against NATO. That and maybe cyber terrorism. In a conventional to conventional fight NATO would be in Moscow within a month.
18 months into the war and this is what happens. The mine roller tank reached a tree line…turned around and went home.
I think NATO without the U.S. could be in Moscow within a month.I honestly didn't see much to learn from there from a US perspective. This deep in the war I would expect us to have air superiority over the battlefield and any armored column like that would get the treatment the Iraqis got trying to get out of Kuwait 30 years ago.
The ONLY deterrent the Russians have is CBRN against NATO. That and maybe cyber terrorism. In a conventional to conventional fight NATO would be in Moscow within a month.
It took Pyroghin ( SP?) 18 hrs didn’t it.I think NATO without the U.S. could be in Moscow within a month.
It took Pyroghin ( SP?) 18 hrs didn’t it.
While no shadows is a giveaway, if they had added shadows, depending on the time of day when observed, the shadows would be obviously wrong
With all the drone attacks, expending anything from older arsenal stores for point defenses seems cost effective to me.
HAWK anti aircraft missiles were pulled out of storage and sent to Ukraine. This is the first video of one in action; the target is a Russian Orlan drone.
A lot of the weaponry sent by the West, whether it be M113s about to be sold to scrap vendors for literally $1 each or Stinger anti aircraft missiles, are proving their worth in UkraineWith all the drone attacks, expending anything from older arsenal stores for point defenses seems cost effective to me.
Don’t attack Russia in the winter! 😉He started behind their lines. I think we would have an initial cautious approach leading to a breakthrough and once that initial line of defense was broken it would be a rush to Moscow. (Look how long it is taking Israel to move on Gaza.)
Don’t attack Russia in the winter! 😉
Our old stuff probably works pretty well against drones. ICBMs, probably not so much.
HAWK anti aircraft missiles were pulled out of storage and sent to Ukraine. This is the first video of one in action; the target is a Russian Orlan drone.
Bet our generals got major wood watching this.
Oh shit! That first video is sickening.
An obviously undertrained and unskilled operator.
So we should expect news of a drive attack on Sevastopol in the near future.