For 3 years Schiff told us he had evidence no one else had - now he is a proven liar. Some people triple down on stupid.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 3 years Schiff told us he had evidence no one else had - now he is a proven liar. Some people triple down on stupid.
TDS afflicts people who never got over DT winning - not me. Since Hillary said today she could beat Trump in November, never got over it, she is patient zero.Man someone has TDS bad.
First, the mainstream media including CNN, NYT, and MSNBC (to name a few) have been an endless blather of fake news and every time it originates from an "unnamed source". As long as it is negative to Trump they don't care and neither do you. It is ok to get a story wrong once in while but you can be that wrong consistently without a transparent negative bias. CNN would interview a chicken on air if it had something negative to say about the administration. Remember the negative reporting on Trump requesting a second scoop of ice cream...disgraceful.
Second, based on what have seen from our intelligence agencies after the Russia Collusion hoax, how could you possibly trust the first version of what they say? Not reacting to a briefing shows wisdom and restraint.
Third, why did he hold a briefing today only with Repubs? Clearly several members of congress have never recovered from his election win and are most consistent backstabbing liars any of us can remember. Do you remember when Trump was only in office for a few months and Durbin ran to a microphone minutes after a private meeting with the president - pure scum. These Dems hold the record in leaking and fit is not remotely close. There are more leaks during this administration than in any prior administration. I don't care who the President is these leaks are not good for national security. Had the administration shared the information regarding the strike on the Iranian defense minister with congress it would have been leaked and it would have compromised the entire operation. Even though that operation was a flawless military success our weak Dem congress people had nothing good to say.
^^^Imagine living like this loon.
Overweight, alone, disgruntled, malcontent, unwashed and ignorant?^^^Imagine living like this loon.
First, the mainstream media including CNN, NYT, and MSNBC (to name a few) have been an endless blather of fake news and every time it originates from an "unnamed source". As long as it is negative to Trump they don't care and neither do you. It is ok to get a story wrong once in while but you can be that wrong consistently without a transparent negative bias. CNN would interview a chicken on air if it had something negative to say about the administration. Remember the negative reporting on Trump requesting a second scoop of ice cream...disgraceful.
Second, based on what have seen from our intelligence agencies after the Russia Collusion hoax, how could you possibly trust the first version of what they say? Not reacting to a briefing shows wisdom and restraint.
Third, why did he hold a briefing today only with Repubs? Clearly several members of congress have never recovered from his election win and are most consistent backstabbing liars any of us can remember. Do you remember when Trump was only in office for a few months and Durbin ran to a microphone minutes after a private meeting with the president - pure scum. These Dems hold the record in leaking and fit is not remotely close. There are more leaks during this administration than in any prior administration. I don't care who the President is these leaks are not good for national security. Had the administration shared the information regarding the strike on the Iranian defense minister with congress it would have been leaked and it would have compromised the entire operation. Even though that operation was a flawless military success our weak Dem congress people had nothing good to say.
Rachel's take on Covid has become tedious. But her coverage of the DoJ and Barr's shenanigans with first the SDNY and now the EDNY offices in the last weak or so has been brutal. That should be front and center everywhere, but is sadly getting little real in depth reporting.Here's a project for you... Watch Rachel Maddow every night for a week and report back any fake news/statements.
First, the mainstream media including CNN, NYT, and MSNBC (to name a few) have been an endless blather of fake news and every time it originates from an "unnamed source". As long as it is negative to Trump they don't care and neither do you. It is ok to get a story wrong once in while but you can be that wrong consistently without a transparent negative bias. CNN would interview a chicken on air if it had something negative to say about the administration. Remember the negative reporting on Trump requesting a second scoop of ice cream...disgraceful.
Second, based on what have seen from our intelligence agencies after the Russia Collusion hoax, how could you possibly trust the first version of what they say? Not reacting to a briefing shows wisdom and restraint.
Third, why did he hold a briefing today only with Repubs? Clearly several members of congress have never recovered from his election win and are most consistent backstabbing liars any of us can remember. Do you remember when Trump was only in office for a few months and Durbin ran to a microphone minutes after a private meeting with the president - pure scum. These Dems hold the record in leaking and fit is not remotely close. There are more leaks during this administration than in any prior administration. I don't care who the President is these leaks are not good for national security. Had the administration shared the information regarding the strike on the Iranian defense minister with congress it would have been leaked and it would have compromised the entire operation. Even though that operation was a flawless military success our weak Dem congress people had nothing good to say.
Muller report = $35 million waste of tax payer funds by people who could not accept losing power. Why would anyone waste time reading soiled Toilet Paper based on a faudulent FISA warrant and investigation. Don't worry - payback is around the corner with the Durham report. That one won't be based on made up shit in a Russian dossier.
Since you're obviously a believer in "Obamagate" maybe you can fill in some interesting pieces of info, with regards to the timeline.
When exactly did the dastardly Dems decide that out of all the 17+ candidates vying for the GOP nomination that Donald Trump presented the threat and his campaign was the one they were going to "conspire against"?
I ask this in the context of RUSSIA being chosen as the target country to link Trump to? Let's revisit the GOP Primaries in the winter/spring of 2016...
Now I didn't watch the Klown show in progress, but my research tells me that it wasn't until he won huge races on Super Tuesday that Trump became favored to win the nomination. That was on March 1, 2016.
So I'd say it's pretty safe to say that the EARLIEST the Dems would have perceived Trump as the major threat, decided to build a "fake conspiracy" set around tying him to a foreign power AND chosen Russia/Putin as the optimum power to "tie him to" would have been the week or so following Super Tues, as the GOP race started to shake out...
Of course, we need to revise that timeline forward a bit because we know that Rubio with the assistance of the Free Beacon had contracted with Fusion to do opposition research on Trump, and that research was still being conducted up until May 2016.
"During the Republican primaries, a research firm called Fusion GPS was hired by The Washington Free Beacon, a conservative website, to unearth potentially damaging information about Mr. Trump. The Free Beacon — which was funded by a major donor supporting Mr. Trump’s rival for the party’s nomination, Senator Marco Rubio of Florida — told Fusion GPS to stop doing research on Mr. Trump in May 2016, as Mr. Trump was clinching the Republican nomination."
So this is where I get confused with the timeline of the Dems taking over that research, Fusion hiring Chris Steele, and the decision to choose Russia as the "scapegoat".We know that Carter Page went to Moscow in June and that the initial report Steele filed dealt with people Page reportedly met with in Russia on the trip. Now, why do you think the Dems zeroed in on Carter Page as the first element that they wanted to use to tie Trump to the "phony conspiracy"?
So WHEN was this nefarious Dem plot hatched, and how did they fortuitously choose Russia, the country Page just happened to visit in June? What could have happened between Super Tues and Carter Page's mid-June trip to Russia? You know since the Dems "invented" this Trump Russia story, and then just happened to luck out when the totally innocent Carter Page just happened to take a totally innocent trip to Russia to attend a Conference which advocated removing sanctions against Russia. Sanctions which affected the Russian Energy sector (which Page was invested in) that were implemented after the Russians invaded the Crimea, in response to Yanukovych being thrown out of Ukraine.
Now let's recount events that preceded Steele's involvement, but subsequent to Trump being a "worthy target" Still wondering what could have caused the Dems to choose Russia as the country to tie Trump to? Couldn't have been anything on Team Trump's end right? I mean the Dems just pulled Russia right out of a hat. And just happened to get lucky when someone nobody knew anything about named Carter Page took a fortuitous trip to Russia, within weeks of the Dems hiring Fusion/Steele...
Wait- maybe THIS is a clue. The March 30, 2016 headline from Quartz Magazine...
"Trump is assembling a team of advisors who have also worked for Putin’s cronies"
In preparation for what will surely be a heated Republican convention, Donald Trump has hired an experienced political operative to help wrangle GOP delegates: Paul Manafort, a strategist with three decades of Republican conventions under his belt, who has also worked for some unsavory international clients.
That roster includes the pro-Russian former president of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych, who was deposed in a popular revolution in 2013.
As Quartz reported earlier this month, Trump’s foreign policy advisors also include Carter Page, a former advisor and current shareholder in the state-controlled Russian natural gas giant, Gazprom, who has advocated for a less adversarial US stance toward Moscow. Bloomberg spoke with Sergey Yatsenko, a former Gazprom official who is now an official adviser to Page’s firm, who said Page “understands what’s going on in Russia … He doesn’t make strong judgments.”
https://qz.com/650201/donald-trump-...rmer-president-putin-buddy-viktor-yanukovych/
So the media knew in March that Trump was hiring dubious people with connections to Putin, but Team Trump didn't know that was a mistake? The Trump people apparently didn't vet either Page or Manafort, and somehow missed these TROUBLING factors? But you think the Dems "INVENTED" the "phony Russian Connection"? LOL...
Seriously Dude, do you Know ANYTHING about this topic? Or are you just coming on here and parroting Trump talking points in the amateur hour?
Seriously Dude, do you Know ANYTHING about this topic? Or are you just coming on here and parroting Trump talking points in the amateur hour?
I half jokingly said I'd like to see rump's head on a pike. Assuming that's not on the menu, how does he not end up being tried for treason when his reign of corruptness is over?
One thing I have learned in 4 years is that Trump followers have no shame. They lack character in many ways almost as much as they lack intelligence. They've looked away on many things and ignore the countless lies that were told to them only to focus on the lie of the moment.Absolute shame for the Republicans that are sweeping this under the rug. Also shame for all the Trumpsters on this forum that look the other way and scream about Benghazi.
Absolute shame for the Republicans that are sweeping this under the rug. Also shame for all the Trumpsters on this forum that look the other way and scream about Benghazi.
i'll let you guys write the captions.
Tone-deaf or being intentionally obnoxious?