The fact the audience went wild over that should concern Democrats. A lot.
Official DNC covention thread
- Thread starter UncleMark
- Start date
That's actually the most effective method of slowing down illegal immigration.
But neither side wants it.
But that doesn't mean we shouldn't enforce illegal immigration laws.
Agree. I've said for years if you want to stop illegal immigration jail the owners, corporate officers, and board of directors who do the hiring.
You're an idiot. No one has criticized that compromise more than I have. What happened was that the GOP kept their side of the bargain and Democrats did not. We should have enforced it and that's not because I'm "mean" or "uncaring." I know you can't help being stupid but sometimes it would be nice if you'd try.
We need enforceable laws on this and that can happen. It will NEVER happen without compromise. This is a fact. If you like the current situation continue with your present position.
Little People of America is a 501 C3 with 7,500 members.
Not a big voting bloc
.Little People of America - Wikipedia
Cuomo now recognizes when MAGA has been telling him for years.
Little People of America is a 501 C3 with 7,500 members.
Not a big voting bloc
Little People of America - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
No, not very big at all. Lest we forget, Hank has some words on the subject…Little People of America is a 501 C3 with 7,500 members.
Not a big voting bloc
Little People of America - Wikipedia
This is probably the most terrible post ever made on this board. Lankford seems like a nice, simple okie. I hold no ill will against the guy.
He needs to be primaried and ran out on a rail for helping draft that bill. We can do much better for a Republican from Oklahoma. I would say the same for McConnell as well but he’s going to die soon.
You know nothing of what you speak. That bill codified millions of fake amnesty claims and subsequently U.S. Entry into law. Every year.
Anyone who supports it is unAmerican.
It’s been interesting Twenty since I’ve now been in this board for a while. I once mistook your arrogance for knowledge but you are actually one of the less informed posters here.
Being informed these days depends greatly on where you get your information.
Someone for example who gets his information from the New York Times will consider a Fox News quoter as being uninformed and visa versa.
We live in a complicated information landscape. Once trusted sources can no longer be. New sources purporting to have the “truth” crop up every hour.
For discerning people there is still such thing as correct and incorrect information, despite all the noise.
Twenty, with his post, showed he is undiscerning.
ChicagoFine, suspect Twenty can tell the difference between a horse and a dog. Therefore, he is not without some degree of discernment.
Just because Twenty supports Senator Lankford's attempt to improve border security and you don't agree with his bill simply is a matter of disagreement and doesn't make Twenty undiscerning.
The equivocation. The relativism.
There is no reading of the bill that evidences it as a “border security” bill. Such an interpretation could only be made out of whole cloth and repeated by the unknowledgeable.
ChicagoFine, found the link below prior to responding to your questioning the Twenty ability to "discern" which is why I described the Lankford bill as dealing with border security.
Check out the link and what wss in the bill to see if it dealt with "border secuity" or that discerning the bill as dealing with border security is as you state, "made of whole cloth".
Lankford Releases Border Security Package With Huge Wins for Securing the Border - Senator James Lankford
WASHINGTON, DC – Senator James Lankford (R-OK) issued the following statement today to announce significant border security policy to the supplemental national security request from the White House: “In the last four months, the US has had the highest number of illegal border crossings every...
www.lankford.senate.gov
