![naacp.org](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fnaacp.org%2Fsites%2Fdefault%2Ffiles%2Fstyles%2Fog_image%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2FiStock-184366127.jpg%3Fitok%3D3zuxZAfh&hash=daddf9b03a8e4d37b222f46156083beb&return_error=1)
NAACP President & CEO, Derrick Johnson, Releases Statement on Not Guilty Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse
NAACP president and CEO condemns Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse Case
![naacp.org](/proxy.php?image=https%3A%2F%2Fnaacp.org%2Fthemes%2Fcustom%2Fnaacp%2Fassets%2Fpwa%2Ficons%2Ffavicon-32x32.png&hash=7ecd9c0ea87649b7e14db9e7de3cbaaf&return_error=1)
"...lost their lives as they peacefully assembled...."
I remember when they were still a legitimate civil rights organization.![]()
NAACP President & CEO, Derrick Johnson, Releases Statement on Not Guilty Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse
NAACP president and CEO condemns Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse Casenaacp.org
"...lost their lives as they peacefully assembled...."
![]()
NAACP President & CEO, Derrick Johnson, Releases Statement on Not Guilty Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse
NAACP president and CEO condemns Verdict in Kyle Rittenhouse Casenaacp.org
"...lost their lives as they peacefully assembled...."
Awesome that you could sum this all up so neatly and so simply.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
Do you ever get tired of being wrong?
They weren't shot because they were rioting though.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
But, you must admit...rioting does place you in a more dangerous situation than staying at home. It is interesting all that the killed or injured individuals all had criminal records. You can mourn their loss but, perhaps you should be more concerned about the all damage the rioters did to innocent people.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
Read the LawI got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
You may have a point if they had gotten killed for rioting.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
Brain. Ass.You may have a point if they had gotten killed for rioting.
That’s not what happened though, is it?
You have really shown your ass over this trial.
You may have a point if they had gotten killed for rioting.
That’s not what happened though, is it?
You have really shown your ass over this trial.
Read the Law
The people he shot were all criminals!So anyone that is scared should be able to shoot whomever they want and it is alright?
I'm an ass for thinking self defense doesn't work when you're the one with the gun? whatever dude.
What about molestation of a 10 year old boy??I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
If you are physically and verbally threatening someone life it is possible to die from your actions no matter where you are.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
It is if you threatened and chase a guy willing to protect his/herself. This case just set precedence. If you are a mob then you don’t have a right to chase and kick, grab or point a gun at anyone without consequences. The right verdict got handed down today.I got a different definition of judge, jury and executioner.
The penalty for rioting isn't death.
Looks like you are wrong. Not sure why you believe that load of crap. You are wrong on this one.Law doesn't say you get to kill anyone you want just because you're scared of someone.
You read the law.
So anyone that is scared should be able to shoot whomever they want and it is alright?
If you are physically and verbally threatening someone life it is possible to die from your actions no matter where you are.
Looks like you are wrong. Not sure why you believe that load of crap. You are wrong on this one.
You should hide for a while.So the only person with a gun had no other options than to shoot them?
So does everyone get this very lenient view of self defense or just the proud ones?
Yeah sure. Wait for the criminal to get the gun or kick the ever living shit out of you. Maybe until death. Why are his rights less important than theirs? So dumb.So the only person with a gun had no other options than to shoot them?
So does everyone get this very lenient view of self defense or just the proud ones?
You are distorting the truth on what happened then defending your distortion, If you watched the trial along with the videos you see that he didn't shot until they started calling him out and chasing him. He was knocked to the ground, a skateboard was swung at his head, one of the "victims" pointed a gun in his face but according to you he was only scared and fired indiscriminately.So anyone that is scared should be able to shoot whomever they want and it is alright?
I'm an ass for thinking self defense doesn't work when you're the one with the gun? whatever dude.
Where do you get your information? The surviving man shot by Rittenhouse admitted he put his gun in Rittenhouse's face before Rittenhouse shot him. The judge wasn't the best in my view but biased only that he believed a defendant was innocence until proven to be convicted. You better hope if you go to trial your judge takes the same position for you.It says you can't kill in self defense unless it is unavoidable. Rittenhouse was the only one with a gun so I don't think that qualifies.
A biased judge influenced the jury.
I feel like the point Anthony Huber's family made in response to the verdict is valid, especially this part:Law doesn't say you get to kill anyone you want just because you're scared of someone.
You read the law.
Yep. It was all peaceful until Young Whitey Gun Boy showed up.I feel like the point Anthony Huber's family made in response to the verdict is valid, especially this part:
"It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street."
That goes both ways. By not prosecuting the other two attackers, vandals or rioters sends the same message. While I agree it was a dumb move to show up at 17 to a protest/riot. He was still within his rights.I feel like the point Anthony Huber's family made in response to the verdict is valid, especially this part:
"It sends the unacceptable message that armed civilians can show up in any town, incite violence, and then use the danger they have created to justify shooting people in the street."
Just so you understand what self defense actually is.well, yea i'd love that judge if ever shoot 3 people and kill 2.
self-defense n. the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or members of the family from bodily harm from the attack of an aggressor, if the defender has reason to believe he/she/they is/are in danger. Self-defense is a common defense by a person accused of assault, battery or homicide. The force used in self-defense may be sufficient for protection from apparent harm (not just an empty verbal threat) or to halt any danger from attack, but cannot be an excuse to continue the attack or use excessive force. Examples: an unarmed man punches Allen Alibi, who hits the attacker with a baseball bat. That is legitimate self-defense, but Alibi cannot chase after the attacker and shoot him or beat him senseless. If the attacker has a gun or a butcher knife and is verbally threatening, Alibi is probably warranted in shooting him. Basically, appropriate self-defense is judged on all the circumstances. Reasonable force can also be used to protect property from theft or destruction. Self-defense cannot include killing or great bodily harm to defend property, unless personal danger is also involved, as is the case in most burglaries, muggings or vandalism. |
mostly peaceful..Yep. It was all peaceful until Young Whitey Gun Boy showed up.
I ordinarily don't waste my time replying to you but I'll make an exception in this case...It says you can't kill in self defense unless it is unavoidable. Rittenhouse was the only one with a gun so I don't think that qualifies.
A biased judge influenced the jury.
That's not exactly what they said. The three people he shot wouldn't have driven to his house to confront him if he just stayed home.Yep. It was all peaceful until Young Whitey Gun Boy showed up.
That’s like a person getting car jacked wouldn’t happen if they stayed home or didn’t own a car.That's not exactly what they said. The three people he shot wouldn't have driven to his house to confront him if he just stayed home.
Did they even know where he lived?That's not exactly what they said. The three people he shot wouldn't have driven to his house to confront him if he just stayed home.
That same logic applies to everyone who was present at those riots. It means nothing.That's not exactly what they said. The three people he shot wouldn't have driven to his house to confront him if he just stayed home.