And your track record of success is widely known!It's a well documented fact. Your belief is immaterial.
And your track record of success is widely known!It's a well documented fact. Your belief is immaterial.
And your track record of success is widely known!
Both were registered in more than one state and voted in both. Felony.
Multiple ballots for Trump, of course...
I'd be fine if they were executed to show everyone we aren't f'in around.
It’s all good. I thought you already knew I’m always right hahahaMark, my apologies. After dinner tonight I looked at multiple sources and you are correct in your description of the merger of registration records.
It is, without a doubt, one of the most screwed up processes I can imagine. Instead of actually verifying a person's actual birthday, to put in a default date of 1900 for birth and 1918 for registration, is just..... bizarre, in my opinion.
It makes me even more pessimistic that we can have an honest election when there is such bogus registration data out there.
They became valid as they verified voters and updated the press holder dates. By the time of the election all except something around 1500 (going from memory, but it’s a very small number) we’re verified and valid, or purged. There’s no evidence that invalid votes were cast and even if everyone of those were Democrats (how stupid would one have to be to believe that?) and voted for Biden, Trump still lost. Face it, Trump is a loser and the sooner he’s purged from the party the better.And I've explained to you that, if a voter registration doesn't have a valid birth date on it - one that can be taken from the original registration form - that is is not a valid registration.
You know that, and yet you insist on claiming to see no problem.
It’s pretty standard when merging data. The data is pretty quickly cleaned up post merger.Mark, my apologies. After dinner tonight I looked at multiple sources and you are correct in your description of the merger of registration records.
It is, without a doubt, one of the most screwed up processes I can imagine. Instead of actually verifying a person's actual birthday, to put in a default date of 1900 for birth and 1918 for registration, is just..... bizarre, in my opinion.
It makes me even more pessimistic that we can have an honest election when there is such bogus registration data out there.
Well, you usually are! I do respect your opinion and perspective. I wish you'd post more often.It’s all good. I thought you already knew I’m always right hahaha
Dude..... merging data was a big part of my career - migrating from one system to another.It’s pretty standard when merging data. The data is pretty quickly cleaned up post merger.
You never fail to bring your hate to Trump into a discussion.They became valid as they verified voters and updated the press holder dates. By the time of the election all except something around 1500 (going from memory, but it’s a very small number) we’re verified and valid, or purged. There’s no evidence that invalid votes were cast and even if everyone of those were Democrats (how stupid would one have to be to believe that?) and voted for Biden, Trump still lost. Face it, Trump is a loser and the sooner he’s purged from the party the better.
The guys that did a big data merger last year where I work, work for me. They did a very similar thing with a couple of the data fields. These guys have doctorates and masters degrees and find this stuff enjoyable. They knew what they were doing. 11 months later and the data cleanup resulting from normal business operations is 99 percent complete.Dude..... merging data was a big part of my career - migrating from one system to another.
I know all about it, which is why I know the way this was done was totally screwed up. It had to have been done by complete amateurs.
There are few things I feel more strongly about than the damage he’s done to the party and the need to purge him from it. That’s not hatred, it’s just objective observation and reason. Sorry about that.You never fail to bring your hate to Trump into a discussion.
You really could just argue the point without doing it. I often agree with you, but then you have to throw the zinger in at the end. Not that you care how I feel about it, but it gets tiresome.
No, if you look at his overall Presidency, the damage of the DNC and FBI did far more damage to the US than Trump ever could do.There are few things I feel more strongly about than the damage he’s done to the party and the need to purge him from it. That’s not hatred, it’s just objective observation and reason. Sorry about that.
No offense, but when we did a data migration, it had to be done in a tight timeframe and be 100% done by the time the new system came up on Monday in time for start of business.The guys that did a big data merger last year where I work, work for me. They did a very similar thing with a couple of the data fields. These guys have doctorates and masters degrees and find this stuff enjoyable. They knew what they were doing. 11 months later and the data cleanup resulting from normal business operations is 99 percent complete.
Not to mention that the voters involved had to be REALLY old, because they had to have been registered and voting regularly prior to the adoption of computerized registration. In general that particular demographic favors Trump, but of course that sort of logical reasoning is too inconvenient when you're trying to promote a conspiracy theory...I love the idea that people were smart enough to cheat the system and get illegal votes in but dumb enough they used the exact same 104 or so year old date for. They put in different names, addresses, genders, but put in a date so old there is almost no one that age in America
No, if you look at his overall Presidency, the damage of the DNC and FBI did far more damage to the US than Trump ever could do.
Sorry, but you are driven by hatred and you are nowhere near objective when it comes to Trump.
What damage did HE do to the Party, other than to win an election that everyone was giving to Hillary before he was even nominated?
A typical non-answer.We already had one party that was completely detached from reality, facts and common sense. Now we have two. That's what he did.
No one can argue God doesn’t have a sense of humor.Use the brain God gave you.
Trump's not done damaging things yet, if Republicans let him.There are few things I feel more strongly about than the damage he’s done to the party and the need to purge him from it. That’s not hatred, it’s just objective observation and reason. Sorry about that.
LOL OK, what do you have against Dr. Oz?Trump's not done damaging things yet, if Republicans let him.
Now, he's endorsing a political novice that he's never met:
“I have known Dr. Oz for many years, as have many others, even if only through his very successful television show,” Trump said of Oz.
Trump gives Dr. Oz ‘complete and total endorsement’ in wide-open PA Senate race
Donald Trump endorsed Dr. Mehmet Oz in his bid for Pennsylvania’s open Senate seat, the former president announced Saturday.nypost.com
LOL OK, what do you have against Dr. Oz?
That's not the question, since none of us are voting in the PA GOP (or Dem, for that matter) Primary in May. The question is what do MAGA team McCormick and MAGA team Oz have against each other respectively? The two have spent $18 million of their own money combined to attack each other in their quest to gain the GOP nomination and "represent" the common man...LOL OK, what do you have against Dr. Oz?
I wasn't talking to you, bot.That's not the question, since none of us are voting in the PA GOP (or Dem, for that matter) Primary in May. The question is what do MAGA team McCormick and MAGA team Oz have against each other respectively? The two have spent $18 million of their own money combined to attack each other in their quest to gain the GOP nomination and "represent" the common man...
Here's McCormick attacking Oz as a RINO...
And here's an even sillier ad from Oz trying to paint McCormick as an out of state carpetbagger. No doubt this concept was developed by Team Oz at his mansion- in New Jersey...
Speaking of "fiscal" conservatives and wasting money on foolishness...It's pretty simple, really.
At one point, to register to vote you had to prove that you were 18. You'd show your ID and the person registering people would check a box "yes". Done deal.
Then the law was changed such that a yes box having been checked was not good enough: an actual date of birth had to be put on file when registering people.
But what about all of those registered under the old system? You'd have large numbers of people that have already been vetted as being of voting age yet didn't have a date of birth in the database. So you could either waste tons of money going back and gathering all of that info, or you could but in a "dummy date" for all of the people that you knew with 100% certainty were old enough to vote when they started voting, anyway.
Most often a fiscal conservative would, I think, say "don't waste all of that money, you already know those people can vote legally". But here, so-called conservatives twist the truth and claim that cheating is going on.
Use the brain God gave you.
Another happy ending follow up where people who were victimized got paid, and may end up getting even more down the road...Speaking of "fiscal" conservatives and wasting money on foolishness...
Remember the case where the nutjob ran an air conditioner repairman off the road and held him at gunpoint while they ransacked his truck looking for "illegal" mail order ballots"? That was in Texas and was a premeptive move before Trump lost conducted in a state that Trump actually won...
Well yesterday the guy that hired and paid the morons who were chasing down imaginary voter fraud was indicted on two felony counts over that incident, even though he didn't personally participate in the monumental ****up himself. He actually paid these clowns (and the ex-cop brandishing the weapon in particular) $266,400 to chase down phony voter fraud. And in the indictment it was revealed that of the $266,000 +, that most o it ($211,400) was paid the day AFTER the incident with the kidnapping at gunpoint...
Just think how much money (and legal consequences to come) this idiot could have saved if he'd only sent his gang of thugs to the Villages to track down actual fraud, rather than chase after imaginary voter fraud in Houston. They basically ran a poor truck driver off the road and could have killed him in the process, since it was dark and they rammed him with their vehicle. Not to mention abducting him at gunpoint...
Houston conservative activist Steven Hotze indicted in bogus election fraud scheme
The charges stem from Hotze’s hiring of private investigators to look for voter fraud in Harris County ahead of the 2020 presidential election.www.yahoo.com