ADVERTISEMENT

Melania is going solo to the State of the Union

Your total lack of self awareness is mind-boggling.

Good greif. Do we have to get back into that "lack of self awareness" smack again? I'd rather read "10 gleaming bridges" than one un-self aware dude.
 
And the usual suspects chiming in on a woman's looks. You're going to learn one of these days....
 
Good greif. Do we have to get back into that "lack of self awareness" smack again? I'd rather read "10 gleaming bridges" than one un-self aware dude.
All this time I thought we wanted a bright shiny new infrastructure. I seem to remember hearing that quite often around here. How does infrastructure shine . . . or how is it bright? Or maybe that's all understandable and this thing about "gleaming" is more partisan nonsense.
 
All this time I thought we wanted a bright shiny new infrastructure. I seem to remember hearing that quite often around here. How does infrastructure shine . . . or how is it bright? Or maybe that's all understandable and this thing about "gleaming" is more partisan nonsense.

I think gleaming roads and bridges will be more important than "shovel ready" jobs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUBBALLAWOL
And the usual suspects chiming in on a woman's looks. You're going to learn one of these days....

I've learned that pants suits are very cool.

melania-trump.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUBBALLAWOL
Wait, who was criticizing Little Joe because of his hair color?
I have to say it is pretty funny that just about everyone thinks the little guy was drooling. If anyone was "born on third base" in politics, it's him, and every other Kennedy. He's so in touch with you, and me, and all of us little peeps, because he's a liberal and that's the secret key. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUBBALLAWOL
He's so in touch with you, and me, and all of us little peeps, because he's a liberal and that's the secret key.
I'm sure there are some people who are all "Ohhh! A Kennedy! Yay!" but, c'mon. You're not giving the rest of us enough credit if you lump us all together like that. Most if not all of us in this thread complimenting him were doing so for specific reasons having to do with his performance last night. It had nothing to do with fawning over the name.
 
I'm sure there are some people who are all "Ohhh! A Kennedy! Yay!" but, c'mon. You're not giving the rest of us enough credit if you lump us all together like that. Most if not all of us in this thread complimenting him were doing so for specific reasons having to do with his performance last night. It had nothing to do with fawning over the name.
Nahhhh. I think you had a woodie. :cool:
 
I'm sure there are some people who are all "Ohhh! A Kennedy! Yay!" but, c'mon. You're not giving the rest of us enough credit if you lump us all together like that. Most if not all of us in this thread complimenting him were doing so for specific reasons having to do with his performance last night. It had nothing to do with fawning over the name.
You liked the drool look? ;) Face it, he wouldn't have been there without the name. Heck, he wouldn't even be in elected office - well, almost certainly wouldn't be.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IUBBALLAWOL
The drool thing along with thrills up their legs is a Dem thing. Another Kennedy drooled a lot as well. I think he was the one that killed a gal. But still got re-elected for life by the left.
 
You liked the drool look? ;) Face it, he wouldn't have been there without the name. Heck, he wouldn't even be in elected office - well, almost certainly wouldn't be.
He was out there mostly because he's a young congressman being groomed for a future Senate seat. And, yes, I think his name is absolutely a huge part of that. But that's irrelevant to my point. Most of us were not fawning all over his name. Most of us were describing the things we thought he actually did well. And his performance was all the more impressive considering how much that speech usually sucks.

Whatever that makeup malfunction on his face was, I have to admit it was distracting. But seeing as it was also meaningless, it took me exactly zero effort to get over it. :D
 
The drool thing along with thrills up their legs is a Dem thing. Another Kennedy drooled a lot as well. I think he was the one that killed a gal. But still got re-elected for life by the left.
After I actually made effort to engage your content in the other thread, I come here and read this, and I remember why bothering to talk to you is a waste of brain cells.
 
Wait, who was criticizing Little Joe because of his hair color?
I didn't criticize him I said I wasn't a fan of gingers. Just personal preference.....now we could talk about Trump's hair,
 
It was chapstick!!! I keep telling you guys! He also joked about it on Good Morning America. The rebuttal is usually awful. In fact there were people questioning why he would even agree to do it. The Dems wanted someone that def wasn't running for President in 2020, so that rules out an awful lot of people. They didn't want them to do it, because usually it's a nightmare. He certainly wasn't a nightmare and probably did himself more good than harm. Usually it's the opposite.
 
I didn't criticize him I said I wasn't a fan of gingers. Just personal preference.....now we could talk about Trump's hair,
So it's OK for me to say I like women with big bosoms, or that I don't like (not a fan of) skinny women?
 
My praise of baby Joe was basically, "Well, he wasn't nearly as a bad as I was expecting." So of course, the conservative intelligentsia here would get in a huffy about that. :rolleyes:
It's not about huffy, it's about fishing trips. When all you've got is ideology, you need to put out lures every day. Right on schedule, the Duemmies take the bait.
 
Most if not all of us in this thread complimenting him were doing so for specific reasons having to do with his performance last night. It had nothing to do with fawning over the name.
And those who were dismissing his performance were doing so because of his lineage (with CoH being an oulier, of course).
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT