ADVERTISEMENT

McCarthy Round 2

So McHenry til 1/3/2024 and then what? If he does well, does he run for Speaker?
reading his background now. awful. weasel. political stupid shit his whole career. only redeeming i see is that his dad started a lawn care company. lives in denver nc. that's not far from @DANC. we'll have to see if danc is willing to vouch for him long term or cut bait
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC and larsIU
People who are disgusted by Gaetz should be appalled by Rashida, but there is no condemnation of her by her own Party.

There should be MORE condemnation against her statements now and before by democrats, but for the record, it is not zero.
 

There should be MORE condemnation against her statements now and before by democrats, but for the record, it is not zero.

I saw she blamed Israel for the hospital after Israel released their proof and the US intel said they agreed. Did she say more things?

Clearly, there are people at the extremes who aren't the sharpest spoons in the drawer, and she'd be one imho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
1. GOP needs a Speaker
2. Jordan can’t get the votes
3. There are 8 appropriations bills to sort out
4. Some members are asking Bilirakis to enter race. Makes sense
 
You understand I was quoting one of yours. That was the point.
I understand completely,,,, someone on the right asking for a link to support something. How's that different from someone on the left asking for a link to support something?
 
200w.gif
 
I would have never in a million years thought I would say this. These arrogant dumb fcking republicans need a lesson. I hope a few go with the dems and elect Hakeem.
And give the Dimcraps the Presidency, Senate and House? That's what you'll settle for?
 
reading his background now. awful. weasel. political stupid shit his whole career. only redeeming i see is that his dad started a lawn care company. lives in denver nc. that's not far from @DANC. we'll have to see if danc is willing to vouch for him long term or cut bait
We've looked at houses in Denver. It's where the white folk go who don't want to live in Charlotte, if you know what I mean. Close to Lake Norman, which is a big draw.

Unfortunately, I'm in the Charlotte district and my Rep is Alma Adams. A nice lady who is a reliable Democrat vote.

North Carolina politicians are horrible - all of them, except for the Lt. Governor. Make Indiana's look respectable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66

There should be MORE condemnation against her statements now and before by democrats, but for the record, it is not zero.
Not zero, but no great condemnation of her personally, either.
 
I understand completely,,,, someone on the right asking for a link to support something. How's that different from someone on the left asking for a link to support something?
No, I was making a reference to someone on the right who likes to refuse to provide links and tells people to look it up themselves.
 
I also provided numerous links from a number of sources that he dismissed out of hand.
Because they were all accusations, Mark. You claimed that's what he called himself. There was no link you posted where he claimed that.

At least be honest about it.
 
Her crying crocodile tears for the 'children' and her screeching shows all the maturity of a GOAT.

Then runs away from questions about the slaughter of Israeli children.

People who are disgusted by Gaetz should be appalled by Rashida, but there is no condemnation of her by her own Party.
Ha..prolly one of the very few that get it.

 
We've looked at houses in Denver. It's where the white folk go who don't want to live in Charlotte, if you know what I mean. Close to Lake Norman, which is a big draw.

Unfortunately, I'm in the Charlotte district and my Rep is Alma Adams. A nice lady who is a reliable Democrat vote.

North Carolina politicians are horrible - all of them, except for the Lt. Governor. Make Indiana's look respectable.
"North Carolina politicians are horrible - all of them, except for the Lt. Governor. Make Indiana's look respectable."
I guess I'm not shocked you approve of Robinson, but I'm curious which one of his hateful, bigoted opinions you value most. His Homophobia, anti-Semitism,, self hatred applied to to other Blacks a la Candace Owens?

Do you agree with his claim that the Rothschilds are the Four Horsemen, international bankers who control not only every central bank, but also are working in conjunction with the CIA, China, and Islam to bring down Donald Trump? You probably haven't seen that video in which he appeared with the Moonies in 2019, because it was so wacky and QAnonish that he was forced to take it down.

Or his condemnation of the Black Panther movie as a Jewish plot where an agnostic Jew created a movie in conjunction with a "satanic Marxist" to get rich off of stupid Black People? He doesn't just hate trans people, he attacks everyone within the LGBTQ community as living in filth. Which is fine for his opinion, but it sort of refutes the claim frequently made on here that the GOP is not anti-LGBTQ...

Anyway since you implied he's the only NC pol who isn't horrible, when a lot of people would have the complete opposite view and consider him one of the worst Pub politicians around, I was just curious why you like him?

 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Because they were all accusations, Mark. You claimed that's what he called himself. There was no link you posted where he claimed that.

At least be honest about it.
Is this about Scalise? There weren't any news sources at the Racist meeting he spoke at, he wasn't talking to the Press. Our only account of what went on comes from the various Neo-Nazi types who attended and composed articles on sites like Stormfront admiring his speech and the way they viewed him as "one of them"

So did Scalise actually tell them to vote for him because he was "Duke without the baggage", or is that just the way they characterized their approval of what he had to say? I personally think that it was a phrase he used to express solidarity with their "concerns", esp since it was Duke followers and he was an invited special guest.

Unlike other examples of Pub politicians cozying up to Neo-Nazis like when Fuentes actually introduced MTG at one of his gatherings, Duke was not actually there in person. They had him on simulcast, and in a way Scalise was a place holder. But he knew exactly who these folks were and who had invited him to come and speak.

So ultimately the question is not whether he said it, or whether they just inferred it and used that characterization in subsequent accounts. Later when Duke went to jail, the "influencers" of that time (2006) promotedl Scalise in the Neo-Nazi media (like Stormfront) as their replacement candidate of choice for their Neo-Nazi brethren.

So the correct question to ask is why did a State Rep in LA in 2002 or 2003 choose to attend a gathering of Neo-Nazis and followers of David Duke? There is a palpable undercurrent of racism in LA politics, and at that point in time Duke was a popular figure in that element of the Right wing of the LA GOP. So while many of us would view the term of "David Duke without the baggage" with horror, that was not a phrase that was likely to hurt him among the constituency he was attempting to reach.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Jim Jordan is finally out of Speaker race. He held a secret ballot after the 3rd failed vote today, and 112 House Republicans voted they don't want him as Speaker. Back to Square 1 for finding a candidate that can get nearly all Republican backing. Does that person even exist?
 
  • Like
Reactions: larsIU
Jim Jordan is finally out of Speaker race. He held a secret ballot after the 3rd failed vote today, and 112 House Republicans voted they don't want him as Speaker. Back to Square 1 for finding a candidate that can get nearly all Republican backing. Does that person even exist?

Don't know if they can ever get to 217.
 
Don't know if they can ever get to 217.

Many of the members are of the "no compromise, even" belief. That makes it hard to get to 217 with just 4 votes to spare. There was a time when moderates in both parties could work together, but we've killed that off. Everyone has to know the longer the Israeli aid package sits, the worse it is going to be. In addition, they had time to get the various budgets passed before the deadline, which is starting to look tougher so another CR. And this CR is totally a self-inflicted wound for the people who want budgets with no CRs.

I really don't get it, they had a chance at a 1% cut CR and turned it down which has led to all this. What on earth were they thinking? They are in a "home run or strikeout" cycle. But in Boehner's book he said many of these Reps didn't want to govern, they only wanted to say no. So they said no to the 1% CR.
 
Many of the members are of the "no compromise, even" belief. That makes it hard to get to 217 with just 4 votes to spare. There was a time when moderates in both parties could work together, but we've killed that off. Everyone has to know the longer the Israeli aid package sits, the worse it is going to be. In addition, they had time to get the various budgets passed before the deadline, which is starting to look tougher so another CR. And this CR is totally a self-inflicted wound for the people who want budgets with no CRs.

I really don't get it, they had a chance at a 1% cut CR and turned it down which has led to all this. What on earth were they thinking? They are in a "home run or strikeout" cycle. But in Boehner's book he said many of these Reps didn't want to govern, they only wanted to say no. So they said no to the 1% CR.

I knew since election night that it was going to be a shitshow with only 5 vote margin. The obstinate ones have always been there, but they didn't matter as much when you have a slightly larger majority. There are some in there that just want to grind things to gridlock, not really interested in practicalities of the situation. And they are getting a lot of attention, now.
 
Is this about Scalise? There weren't any news sources at the Racist meeting he spoke at, he wasn't talking to the Press. Our only account of what went on comes from the various Neo-Nazi types who attended and composed articles on sites like Stormfront admiring his speech and the way they viewed him as "one of them"

So did Scalise actually tell them to vote for him because he was "Duke without the baggage", or is that just the way they characterized their approval of what he had to say? I personally think that it was a phrase he used to express solidarity with their "concerns", esp since it was Duke followers and he was an invited special guest.

Unlike other examples of Pub politicians cozying up to Neo-Nazis like when Fuentes actually introduced MTG at one of his gatherings, Duke was not actually there in person. They had him on simulcast, and in a way Scalise was a place holder. But he knew exactly who these folks were and who had invited him to come and speak.

So ultimately the question is not whether he said it, or whether they just inferred it and used that characterization in subsequent accounts. Later when Duke went to jail, the "influencers" of that time (2006) promotedl Scalise in the Neo-Nazi media (like Stormfront) as their replacement candidate of choice for their Neo-Nazi brethren.

So the correct question to ask is why did a State Rep in LA in 2002 or 2003 choose to attend a gathering of Neo-Nazis and followers of David Duke? There is a palpable undercurrent of racism in LA politics, and at that point in time Duke was a popular figure in that element of the Right wing of the LA GOP. So while many of us would view the term of "David Duke without the baggage" with horror, that was not a phrase that was likely to hurt him among the constituency he was attempting to reach.
Read five of those articles linked earlier and none says what you claim happened. Not one said he used that phrase in a speech to a racist organization. A journalist says he said it to him, but that it didn’t mean he shared Duke’s racist views (the baggage), but did have some of the same conservative policy views. Even that he spoke to the Racist group is in dispute.

Link where you got your version of this story.
 
I guess I'm not shocked you approve of Robinson, but I'm curious which one of his hateful, bigoted opinions you value most. His Homophobia, anti-Semitism,, self hatred applied to to other Blacks a la Candace Owens?

Do you agree with his claim that the Rothschilds are the Four Horsemen, international bankers who control not only every central bank, but also are working in conjunction with the CIA, China, and Islam to bring down Donald Trump? You probably haven't seen that video in which he appeared with the Moonies in 2019, because it was so wacky and QAnonish that he was forced to take it down.

Or his condemnation of the Black Panther movie as a Jewish plot where an agnostic Jew created a movie in conjunction with a "satanic Marxist" to get rich off of stupid Black People? He doesn't just hate trans people, he attacks everyone within the LGBTQ community as living in filth. Which is fine for his opinion, but it sort of refutes the claim frequently made on here that the GOP is not anti-LGBTQ...

Anyway since you implied he's the only NC pol who isn't horrible, when a lot of people would have the complete opposite view and consider him one of the worst Pub politicians around, I was just curious why you like him?

In your rush to judge others as racist, you might want to check yourself.

Using the term "Blacks" instead of "black people" or "Black people" is frowned upon. You sound like Trump. Black is an adjective. Using it as a noun is dehumanizing.

Also, it's very privileged and entitled for a white man to be calling out black people for "self-hatred applied to" black people. You don't get to be the arbiter of Uncle Tom status.


Now, I'm going to assume you didn't know these things or weren't thinking about them and intentionally trying to be racist. It'd be nice if you could use the same principle of generosity in interpreting other politicians and posters.

For example, Robinson's quote about black people "owing" had nothing to do with them owing for slavery, he was talking about a debt owed to ancestors who had lived through the worst but came out of it and tried to make a better life for their descendents. His rhetorical point was intentionally and obtusely misread by the critic you cite. Seems Robinson is trying to switch the narrative from victimhood to gratitude.
 
They said he said what I said he said.
Not one of the ones I read said definitively that he said it, they say he allegedly said it. The source of it appears to be one journalist who said he said it, but that it meant Scalise shared some of the same conservative policy positions and not Duke’s racism, which is obviously the baggage.

This place could use an honesty enema.
 
I’ll admit it. My first instinct is to point and laugh at this shit show. But this is our country. I’m just not jaded enough to think we can’t do better. The GOP is a non functioning party.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT