Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No kidding!! Hoo Hoo Hoosiers!!I hope he enjoyed the weather though.
In an interview Steve said that you just can't win at UCLA. You have to win flashy to keep their attention because there is so much to do in the area. Not a good situation in my view. I will take winning no matter what it looks like.Seriously how much longer does Steve last at UCLA? His 2018 recruiting class will likely save him for another year but it seems like most of the fans want him out.
Except he doesn’t win. He just lost to Saint Bonaventure in the play in game. They missed the tournament two years ago. In 23 years of coaching at the D1 level, he’s never been past the Sweet 16. Iowa fans hate him. New Mexico fans hate him. UCLA fans hate him.In an interview Steve said that you just can't win at UCLA. You have to win flashy to keep their attention because there is so much to do in the area. Not a good situation in my view. I will take winning no matter what it looks like.
Except he doesn’t win. He just lost to Saint Bonaventure in the play in game. They missed the tournament two years ago. In 23 years of coaching at the D1 level, he’s never been past the Sweet 16. Iowa fans hate him. New Mexico fans hate him. UCLA fans hate him.
Imagine if we had Alford. Good lord. If ever there were a coaching career that one could label mediocre, HIS would be it.
Tom Crean says hi.
I agree Alford is mediocre at best. So glad we didn’t get him.
But I don’t understand why IU fans are talking trash to Wilkes. Would he be better off sitting at home at IU? At least they made the tourney and he had a good year. And I bet living in LA hasn’t been too bad for the kid. It’s not like he passed up the opportunity to play on a top IU team.
No. He's interested, but Louisville isn't.Alford to UofL?
Thanks, tell him I said hello but that has nothing to do with the topic at hand so you could've just PM'd that to me?
In Alford's 19 seasons he has never made it past his 3 Sweet 16's. In his 13 combined years at Iowa and UCLA, he has never even won a conference title. ha In Crean's 18 seasons he made 4 sweet 16's and a Final Four. Let alone the conference championships. Alford makes Crean look like John Wooden.
Well, you are correct, those records should be included obviously. On the downside didn't his New Mexico team get bounced twice in the first or 2nd round once as a 2 seed, maybe twice? I cannot recall.I'm very happy that neither Crean nor Alford are coaching IU, but c'mon, Alford doesn't make Crean look like John Wooden. And why are you not including his SW Missouri St years? They are D1 and he took them to the Sweet 16. And why do you leave out his New Mexico years when talking conference championships. He won the conference there 4 out of 6 years.
They both are pretty damn mediocre, but if I had to pick one, I'd probably rather have Alford here than Crean. The problem with bringing him here, though, is that it would be really difficult to ever fire him.
I'm very happy that neither Crean nor Alford are coaching IU, but c'mon, Alford doesn't make Crean look like John Wooden. And why are you not including his SW Missouri St years? They are D1 and he took them to the Sweet 16. And why do you leave out his New Mexico years when talking conference championships. He won the conference there 4 out of 6 years.
They both are pretty damn mediocre, but if I had to pick one, I'd probably rather have Alford here than Crean. The problem with bringing him here, though, is that it would be really difficult to ever fire him.
He' not interested in LouisvilleNo. He's interested, but Louisville isn't.
Oh, we should include his 23 years JUST to equal the same number of sweet 16's as Crean did? Let alone while at Marquette for half of his 18 years? Even with that information Alford still falls short of going past the Sweet 16, which Crean did. I was specific on the conference titles when in a big boy conference. Winning at small conferences (which he never did at SWMS) with 12 losses......come on. Both are mediocre but one of them is way more limited. That would be Alford. Hands down, not even up for debate.
A lot if these fans talking trash about Wilkes wanted him at iu in the worst way.I agree Alford is mediocre at best. So glad we didn’t get him.
But I don’t understand why IU fans are talking trash to Wilkes. Would he be better off sitting at home at IU? At least they made the tourney and he had a good year. And I bet living in LA hasn’t been too bad for the kid. It’s not like he passed up the opportunity to play on a top IU team.
Do tell.There are some interestig rumors going around about the UCLA job.
Crean has the Final Four over Alford - due to having Wade, a player no one else recruited because of his academics.Oh, we should include his 23 years JUST to equal the same number of sweet 16's as Crean did? Let alone while at Marquette for half of his 18 years? Even with that information Alford still falls short of going past the Sweet 16, which Crean did. I was specific on the conference titles when in a big boy conference. Winning at small conferences (which he never did at SWMS) with 12 losses......come on. Both are mediocre but one of them is way more limited. That would be Alford. Hands down, not even up for debate.
Once he was told they weren't interested his stance changed then.He' not interested in Louisville
Oh, we should include his 23 years JUST to equal the same number of sweet 16's as Crean did? Let alone while at Marquette for half of his 18 years? Even with that information Alford still falls short of going past the Sweet 16, which Crean did. I was specific on the conference titles when in a big boy conference. Winning at small conferences (which he never did at SWMS) with 12 losses......come on. Both are mediocre but one of them is way more limited. That would be Alford. Hands down, not even up for debate.
Bullshit. Like when Iu was interested in hiring Alford right?? Fake newsOnce he was told they weren't interested his stance changed then.
Crean has the Final Four over Alford - due to having Wade, a player no one else recruited because of his academics.
In “Big Boy” conferences, Crean won 2 RS titles (2013 & 2016); Alford won 2 BTT’s (2001 & 2006).
Both are mediocre, but if given a choice between the two I take Steve. Every. Single. Time.
If Steve can't make it happen at UCLA, he wouldn't have ever made it happen at IU. At least the UCLA job provides total closure on "what could have been" with Steve at IU.I wanted Alford to be better. As he went further into his career, it became more telling that he would never be an elite coach. I'm glad we can remember him as the great player and not as the coach we had to fire.
You have to think this is his last stop before he becomes only considered at schools that are happy to make the NIT and sometimes the NCAA.
Oh, just wait! Next up is a debate between who had the more impressive recruiting strategy.... Mike Davis addressing the recruiting letter wrong to Mike Conley or Tom Crean taking a dump and freaking out at Kyrie Irving's house. It's gonna be a good debate!Mercy. Sounds too much like a debate about whose ex-wife was the worst.
I blame Davis more on Luke Harangody not coming to IU. He didn't even recruit him.Oh, just wait! Next up is a debate between who had the more impressive recruiting strategy.... Mike Davis addressing the recruiting letter wrong to Mike Conley or Tom Crean taking a dump and freaking out at Kyrie Irving's house. It's gonna be a good debate!
I hope he enjoyed the weather though.