And you know she’s a well respected DC lawyer how? More likely just another Sidney Powell or Rudy Guliani. Fing shit bags Trumpers.
It’s indictment time again….
- Thread starter zeke4ahs
- Start date
QAnon Fears R.F.K., Jr., Will Take Votes Away from J.F.K., Jr.
“I’m not a paranoid person,” a QAnon spokesman said, “but it almost seems like a conspiracy.”
He supports reparations. The Green New Deal. Ending the 2nd Amendment. We could go on forever.QAnon Fears R.F.K., Jr., Will Take Votes Away from J.F.K., Jr.
“I’m not a paranoid person,” a QAnon spokesman said, “but it almost seems like a conspiracy.”www.newyorker.com
If you’re about sterilization, lets include libs and welfare mommas.
Then we should definitely do the MAGA folks(you included). Maybe the country would get back to some civil discourse and Congress could go back to compromising. Nah. Way too much to ask for.
Did you miss the quote about "taking votes away from JFK Jr? It doesn't matter what RFK advocates or opposes, with regards to the article.
The lunacy is that the QAnon spokesperson is afraid that RFK Jr will take votes away from HIS PREFERRED CANDIDATE, JFK Jr. He actually says that while he's not nomally a "paranoid person" that it almost seems like a conspiracy...
A conspiracy, for RFK Jr to steal votes from a guy that DIED in 1999... This is right up there with the wacky claims that Venezuelan strong man Hugo Chavez purposely arranged for the voting machines he "flooded into the US" to cheat Trump during the 2020 election...
Chavez died in 2013 (while Obama was POTUS)...
Almost as good as the Jewish space lasers responsible for the California wildfires. MTG posted that on her page. Can’t make this crap up. Need to cull the here’d of all of these nuts.
You’re a prime example of non civil
discourse. You need in the sterilization line too.
That’s not saying much with me. You’d probably have no problem kicking my ass but I’d fight till I couldn’t fight anymore. 😂
I can’t even kick the dog let alone your ass. Be 67 in December so nearly at my expiration date. Wife will probably put a pillow over my face some night and I won’t even fight it.
Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney, reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ellis is the fourth defendant in the Georgia election interference case to change their plea to guilty.
Will the "lawyers" pleading guilty be disbarred?Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney, reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ellis is the fourth defendant in the Georgia election interference case to change their plea to guilty.www.wsbtv.com
And does pleading guilty in Georgia set them up for a conviction in other states; if charged?
Last edited:
Some of them might, but disciplinary hearings are separate and they could be disbarred (or not) with or without a guilty plea/conviction.
As for your second question, the answer is no, in theory, since prior bad acts are generally not admissible evidence. Someone with criminal law experience, however, might detail important exceptions that I'm not well versed in.
Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney, reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ellis is the fourth defendant in the Georgia election interference case to change their plea to guilty.
Lmao...
“In the frenetic pace of attempting to raise challenges to the election in several states, including Georgia, I failed to do my due diligence. I believe in and value election integrity. If I knew then what I know now, I would have declined to represent Donald Trump in these post election challenges,”
Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney, reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ellis is the fourth defendant in the Georgia election interference case to change their plea to guilty.
How long until Trump comes out and says that she wasn't his attorney as well?
Pretty soon he's going to make it look like he represented himself in all those post election cases if he keeps saying all these lawyers didn't work for him.
Her plea is bad news for Giuliani, and all of the pleas are bad news for Trump.Jenna Ellis, former Trump attorney, reaches plea deal in Georgia election interference case
Ellis is the fourth defendant in the Georgia election interference case to change their plea to guilty.
Willis is presenting a masterclass on RICO/white collar crime prosecution. She's a bright, highly skilled DA.
Prior convictions aren't admissible to demonstrate a defendant's propensity for committing crimes like the one he's being charged with. However if the defendant takes the stand, the prior conviction may (depending on a lot of factors including the nature of the prior conviction) be allowed for impeachment.
But wait. Isn’t one of his defenses that he was following the legal counsel from his attorneys? So if none end up being his attorney… We’ll I guess we can all see how this ends. 😂
Yeah, you don't think a defendant who is a lawyer already knows that? That's a basic rule of evidence. But there are other possible exceptions, as well. Basically, if the prosecutor can convince the judge that there is a question of material fact in dispute, and admitting the prior bad act would help to adjudicate this question, it might be allowed. I have no idea how likely such a ploy is to work, though, which is why we need an experienced criminal attorney.
There are many people here who know nothing about criminal law. The rule is that prior convictions are not admissible as evidence of guilt. They're too prejudicial to be allowed in, and I don't know how any material fact question in a criminal trial would overcome that hurdle without the defendant taking the stand.
My comment was really in response to the other poster's inquiry. I made the mistake of replying to you.
Why do you have a propensity for being a dick?
Goat -- I believe lawyers Cheesebro, Powell and now Ellis have pleaded guilty only to misdemeanors, not felonies.
I think I read a while back that lawyers don't get completely disbarred for misdemeanors, if they have no felony convictions. Do you know?
EDIT: Never mind. I thought of a couple misdemeanors that probably deserve disbarment, like stealing small amounts from clients, lying to clients about the status of a case, calling the judge obscene names.
Last edited:
Apples and Oranges, but as a professional engineer, if I get convicted of a felony, I will lose my license. In the case of misdemeanors, if it is not directly related to my profession / clients, then the licensing board doesn't particularly care.
If it is a misdemeanor is related to my clients / profession, and that infraction has been reported to the licensing board, then it is an individual case that they will examine. For example, as you said as one of your misdemeanors, lying to your client, it would depend upon the lie. If I were to lie and say "Code requirements require this to be 1 cfm per square foot, but nobody ever checks that, so you can probably get away with it only being 0.9 cfm per foot", that kind of thing would probably get me a monetary fine and maybe probation. Lying about saying that my design meets all of the code requirements for safety when I knowingly have omitted items in order to save costs, that would likely result in me losing my license.
So, I would guess it is the same with the bar review. It would be looked at on an individual basis.
So are you gonna argue, (knowing dbm's grasp of reality) that he realized the guy in the article HE POSTED was complaining about taking votes from a dead man?DBM basically echoed the same "arguments" the guy in the article listed about RFK. I didn't even read the article, the blurb was enough. The guy claimed he wasn't a "conspiracy theorist" but then proceeded to argue why he believed that RFK was stealing votes from JFK Jr, as if that was a real thing.
Anybody who posted that article for any other reason than to point out the insanity of QAnon is a wackaddodle. And clearly that was not the reason dbm posted it. So draw your own conclusions and stick your comments (on a post having nothing to do with you) up your fatass...
That’s something I’ve never been called…congratulations.
QAnon….you are the only one I ever see reference that person or term or whatever it is.
