It’s indictment time again….
- Thread starter zeke4ahs
- Start date
Please point out in the constitution where it says the judge can not restrict a defendants speech intended to intimidate witnesses. This restriction is imposed all the time on defendants. Your Orange Jesus love is showing again. Can’t wait to see him in his orange jumpsuit. He can have another tv reality show then. You need to get off cult island before you are beyond redemption.
Wrong. 1st Amendment. Find me the cases where SCOTUS has allowed a similar gag order on the defendant. I'll wait. Gag orders on the defendant are virtually unheard of in American jurisprudence.
Last edited:
Wrong. First amendment for ids gag orders on the press not people. US vs Quattrone.
Puts his country over himself. A true statesman.
Gee wonder why that would be? Well just maybe because defendants are generally not stupid enough to threaten judges, jurors, or anyone else who he suspects wants to follow the rule of law, and find him guilty.
Likely unconstitutional, yes. But it makes sense when you recognize that Judge Chutkan is a political operative and not an upholder of the law.
The same way Trump stacked the Supreme court with constitutionalists who want to preserve our rights, Obama stacked the DC district court with marxist ideologoues. The DC District court is probably the second or third most important court in the country because any alleged crimes committed by those in Federal government will be tried there. It makes it fertile ground to go after Republican political opponents on tenuous charges, especially given the political makeup of a typical D.C. jury.
To anyone who considers themself a centrist or even center left and believes Obama to be a "moderate". All I will say is look at his judicial nominations. Each one of them more radical and with less respect for the constitution than the last.
Don't be fooled.
He has to be a troll. Or he's a sentient bag of hammers that's learned how to type.
You must be high. Trump is the only President we’ve had in my lifetime who obviously cares more about himself than our country.
That's just more Trump crap.
Nonetheless, if Trump really does volunteer to go to jail instead of complying with the order, it's entirely possible I will never call him a liar again (at least until he opens his mouth again).
Aren’t a lot of the Jan 6 indictment actions outside his presidential duties, though? I thought part of that indictment was incitement to violence, gathering protesters in DC, etc. ?
I don’t necessarily think he can be criminally convicted of inciting violence based on what I’ve heard, but that rally had nothing to do with his presidential duties. It was a prolonged campaign speech and gathering.
No. Nothing regarding January 6. All things that fall within his duty as the head of the Executive branch to enforce the laws.
No. It's your point, so you prove it.
So, find us all the cases where SCOTUS struck down a gag order against a criminal defendant with millions of followers that.called his prosecutor a thug, said a witness deserves death and publicly doxxed a jusge's law clerk (etc. etc. etc.).
Absolutely hilarious!! Can’t wait to see him behind bars where he belongs. He should have lots of company as his buddies will all join him.
What they did is commit an enormous amount of crimes. That guy looks like he’s got pretty nice digs for a homeless guy. Lol.
So what executive action was he taking on Jan 6 and what laws was he enforcing?
Dbm's legal analysis is limited to
(1) Trump is being prosecuted,
(2) I don't want him to be prosecuted,
(3) therefore, the prosecution is unconstitutional, illegal and a witchhunt. being conducted by deranged and corrupt prosecutors, judges and witnesses; they're all commies too.
You can’t make this stuff up. I’d take almost anyone over the current makeup of the conservative Supreme Court. They are not ethically challenged. They are ethically bankrupt. They don’t have to live by the same rules that every federal judge in America has to abide by. And Justice Thomas excuse in one case on non disclosure is that he didn’t understand the regs. So he understands the intricacies of the US Constitution but not the reporting regulations. Please God help us. I could care less if they are conservative or liberal. Just give me honest ethical judges.
His decision or indecision to call up the national guard to defend the Capitol building would be one.
You really have no life other than your cult membership. You were undoubtedly in DC on January 6th. “Hold no other before thy God.” Idol worship is a no no.
Who gives a shit what Mike Davis thinks? Shouldn't you be at least as informed as he is on this subject? If not, why not? Are you content just being a follower on social media? Apparently so.
No defendant has the right, First Amendment or otherwise, to attack witnesses, court staff and prosecutors. Pretrial smear campaigns by criminal defendants have never been allowed. The fact that this defendant is a former president who is running for president again doesn't change that.
You should read more. Social media doesn't count. It's grab 'n go sensationalism - - - "influencers" looking for people with short attention spans and followers like you who are unable or unwilling to read at length, gather information, and critically think.
No. He hasn't been charged with inciting or encouraging the mob on January 6, or for promoting the "Will be Wild!" rally.
He can only critically think how much he adores Orange Jesus and hates on anyone who stands in his way to be anointed God Almighty.
I guess they are only using his words at the rally as supporting evidence of intent and scheme:
What's in the Jan. 6 Trump indictment
A new federal indictment laid out the details of the former president's alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.
I would think his actions in regards to fake electors are well outside his presidential duties, and so no immunity would apply. His actions w/r/t the Justice Dept. and Pence might fall within the legal immunity DBM's links discuss.
dmbhoosier got undergrad degree from Trump U., and his law degree from Twitter U.
Yeah letting the mob hang Pence is presidential.I guess they are only using his words at the rally as supporting evidence of intent and scheme:
What's in the Jan. 6 Trump indictment
A new federal indictment laid out the details of the former president's alleged conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election.abcnews.go.com
I would think his actions in regards to fake electors are well outside his presidential duties, and so no immunity would apply. His actions w/r/t the Justice Dept. and Pence might fall within the legal immunity DBM's links discuss.
Maurer. And here's a very well respected DC lawyer that says you're all full of shit.
