Is the destruction of critical infrastructure
- Thread starter Mas-sa-suta
- Start date
That’s a fact, I voted for Trump because I got tired of all the Woke shit.That's slightly humorous.
1) Oh hell no.
2) Won't be Colts or Bears.
But I am sure you would celebrate a Russian victory.
They have an NFL franchise now? Wouldn't they be the real bears?
Last edited:
Yes to all.
And I'm not 'devoted' to Trump, but I'd vote for him again, if he was the Republican nominee.
I would not. Here in lies the rub. You lose me and you lose the election. I don't care who wins as long as it is not The Don.
So, the country be damned as long as it's not Don, is what you're really saying
You asked if I'd voted for those persons and I said yes. What more do you want?
Fundamental facts..
Ukraine is barely functioning as a sovereign state.
Infrastructure supporting the military is being systematically destroyed by multiple precision munitions.
The last attack on Sunday involved around 100 munitions, which, we are told, couldn't have happened, because those munitions didn't exist.
The Ukr casualty count of 100K killed and 2-300k wounded were confirmed by links and two sources.
I'd go on, but to what purpose?
You have little interest in facts.
The Soviet Union claims they lost over 20 MILLION people during WWII.
Should they have just capitulated to the Nazis?
If so, the continent of Europe would all be speaking German now, because the US and United Kingdom weren't going to suffer the kind of casualties it would take to retake Europe, facing the full strength of the Wehrmacht.
DANC, it could be argued that Stalin's "scorched earth policy" was a form of capitulation.
IMO, once Hitler decided to fight the war on two fronts, Germany was destined to lose. Simply didn't have the resources to win, much less defeat and rule all of Europe and the Soviet Union.
I don't see how that's considered capitulation when you sacrifice 20* million souls.
Of course fighting on 2 fronts caused his defeat, but only because Stalin was willing to sacrifice his population.
Interesting limitation . . . according to hoot's post below yours, I'd say no. But the real story is in what you didn't ask . . . i.e., whether Russia's invasion of Ukraine was a war crime under this definition from hoot's post . . .
Crimes against peace, which are acts of hostile military action against a sovereign country that isn't in self defense.
Why don't you ask whether Russia's invasion constituted "hostile military action" "that isn't in self-defense"? I'd say that Russia committed a war crime under that definition.
DANC, in defense of your premise that Stalin could have saved lives by negotiating a surrender (capitulation) you could be right.
Meanwhile, some German generals were willing to save lives by surrendering (capitulation).
The lesson to be learned is dictators such as Stalin and Hitler put their personal objectives above saving the lives of their expendable countrymen.
Yes, they were very much alike in that regard.
That's why the Allies were very methodical in preparation for the invasion. They knew there was no way Allied leaders t take the kind of casualties the Soviet Union was taking. In some ways, they basically were fine with Stalin using his own people to bleed Hitler dry and then we could take him on.
Now they're bleeding Ukraine dry on the pretense
that Russia can be bullied.
Poland's military is next.
Ukraine isn't the one running out of ammo.
Who are you listening to that's telling your Poland is next? That ain't gonna happen.
Why are you backing Russia? You posted a link that said that Russia invaded Ukraine and has killed 10s of thousands of its citizens. I said we're in violent agreement about that. How does it support your apparent support for Russia in this conflict? Why are you aligned with America's enemies rather than America's partners and allies?
We all understand that you are much more credible than the 6-year German MOD who is current President of The European Commission.
What a ****ing fraud you are.
You want Russia to take on Poland "next?" You want us to go to war with Russia? Are you an American?
You're claiming that Russia has killed 10s of thousands of Ukrainians because of their invasion of Ukraine. What is your point? You're backing Russia. You're proud of that?
OK . . . so I'll ask you. Is Russia's invasion of Ukraine a "hostile military action" "that isn't in self-defense"?
Was the invasion a war crime?
Is Putin a war criminal?
For some reason, war crimes always are committed by the side that loses the war.
The same people who write the history also get to define war crimes? What a scam.
Zelensksy named Times person of the year.
time.com
Volodymyr Zelensky Is TIME's 2022 Person of the Year
Volodymyr Zelensky’s success as a wartime leader has relied on the fact that courage is contagious
time.com
Let me reply for Mas - so was HItler. lolZelensksy named Times person of the year.
Volodymyr Zelensky Is TIME's 2022 Person of the Year
Volodymyr Zelensky’s success as a wartime leader has relied on the fact that courage is contagious
Nobel Peace Prize winner calls for war crimes trial for Putin and Russian military leaders:
news.yahoo.com
Ukrainian Nobel Peace Prize winner calls for war crimes tribunal for Putin and Russian military leaders
A Ukrainian human rights activist set to receive the Nobel Peace Prize next week says world leaders must create a special international tribunal to place Russian President Vladimir Putin and large numbers of his military on trial for war crimes.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
Don Fisher on Indiana basketball - "Chaos." (From Monday Feb. 10)
- Latest: frikkenfrakken
-
-
-
-