Why don't we worry about that after Crean gets past the sweet 16....
Interesting Offer by IU...
- Thread starter bsmitty08
- Start date
Why don't we worry about that after Crean gets past the sweet 16....
Here's a Washington Post article. It says the opposite though it looks at it in a different fashion. You can find a link to anything. People pay for studies to reflect what they want. That one obviously was paid for by the old clueless people who believe Reefer Madness was a documentary. Maybe the Washington Post are a bunch of hippies... right?
And 9 to 17 (whatever) is not a large enough sample size for any test. So, it's basically poppycock.. and also a bit misleading. Though they attempt to explain, they do a very poor job of it and gloss over the most important part.
They cannot through current drug testing determine when a person used! So, they cannot in any definitive way know if they were impaired or not. They gloss over that fact with one short sentence, which in turn misrepresents the whole article. Let alone not having near enough sample size to determine anything.
They can only guess based on thc level in the blood. Sure in most instances they could be correct as more thc means more probability that it was used. But, that still means nothing ..
Science: THC (which is type of cannabinoid) by itself does not get anyone high, it's a combination of chemicals and ratio of the chemicals known as cannabinoids (CBD, CBN) that help THC. If those other types of cannabinoids are in too large amount, or too small, nothing happens, regardless of the THC level. And yet the thc level will still read positive though the person may never had been impaired at all.
Science: the reason why they have such a hard time coming up with a valid test is because every living multi cell creature on the planet has cannabinoid receptors throughout their brains, organs and nervous system. The body does not recognize it as a poison, like most man made drugs, so, it's much harder to test for. Plus, it's a very complicated plant and they've only identified a small portion of the chemicals in it.
Fact: these receptors ONLY except cannabinoids. Nothing else.
Fact: The human brain has more cannabinoid receptors than any other G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) type.
Why? Why are they there?
Note: in the wiki article (wiki is a poor choice for information, sorry) it states mammalian brain, that is false, as fish, reptiles, birds and even smaller cellular creatures have endocannabinoid systems.
Educate yourself ... ignorance helps no one.
Last edited:
I was wondering where the hell you've been, it's about time you showed up!
Keep believing everything the government tells ya bud.....
There is nothing wrong with some sleeping pills or pain killers, right? lol
Believing what? Government hadn't told me a thing....it was a AAA auto service that conducted the study ...just saying impaired is impaired no matter what substance
What do they say about those evil Cell Phones?
BAN THEM I SAY!!! One accident is too many!!!
And don't get me started on guns and cars......you see where the 2 year shot the driver last week by accident?
BAN THEM I SAY!!!
Another example how you twist things to suit your needs... I told the poster to keep on smoking his bud...not me geez
I didn't try to twist anything.
But I can picture you trying to take Bud Light and a pack of ZigZags and trying to roll a blunt . . .
It is difficult to overdoes on pot, but your claim is not correct. Sudden stroke, heart attack, caused while smoking or consuming.
https://familycouncil.org/?p=6506
Before you say that person died of a stroke, not smoking pot, that would be like saying someone shot in the head died from bleeding out.
You really didn't understand now did you...that was a real stretch just like your stat table conclusions ....I am more of a craft beer guy anyways
You didn't read your own link and associated studies did you?
No he didn't, lol
but he did used to work for RMK, which is like staying at a holiday inn
No kidding. Thousands upon thousands of people die every year from both.
Yet, pot is banned.
(rolleyes)
Lol
I know this will be the equivalent of playing chess with a parrot but here's goes.
Caffeine can do the same thing (raise heart rate). Anger. Exercise. Sex. Watching porn. Watching basketball. Anything that excites you. If a person has a heart condition all of the above can increase chance of heart attacks and stroke. And, your analogy is completely backwards.
Also, it's not difficult, it's impossible, to OD on cannabis. It's not a poison. The body knows exactly what to do with it. Do you even know what a peptide or receptor is? Probably not.... if not it's a waste of time to explain to you why it's impossible.
Okay, now it's your turn to squawk repeated gibberish, crap on the chess board and strut away like you won something. No I will not give you a cracker.
Last edited:
Good grief....you do everything that you accuse Taz of doing. Half your posts are just smart aleck remarks at the Haters
I was just responding to Taz's post that I am snarky.
Keep up. And I'm tired of the term "snarky" and "snark".
And you are King of the Smart Arse remarks.
This is the kinda discourse that elevates this board, dws....please remember that our interaction started with me saying that you do the same things that you accuse Taz of doing....and you keep proving me right. Thanks
Taz talks sports, you talk posters. Whether or not I Agree or disagree with a poster, I'll take the guy that talks sports...Everytime
Just talking sports, huh? And that took me about 2.3 seconds…didn't even have to search.
And you of course ignore the post to which I replied....not surprising
I replied to a post that wasn't about bball, but go ahead with your bad self
Yes that post was on topic...I was directing him back on topic...you actually helped me, that's what you do
