Ok dude I've seen all of the points you've laid out and you just don't know anything about replay review, it's very obvious. Indisputable evidence is what is needed to overturn the call on the field, there weren't very many good camera angles as we saw on replay, so it was extremely hard from a ref's standpoint to find indisputable evidence. They said the call on the field STANDS, when a call stands that is essentially the refs saying "we can't fully tell based on our cameras so we are sticking with the call on the field". The refs are not taking plays in a vacuum when they go to replay review, they are taking them within the context of what the call on the field was. You are trying to make it sound like the people reviewing these plays are working for ESPN, deciding what would be a better storyline. Even if that were the case you would be 100% wrong because any normal CFB analyst would assume that IU's win was a one off and they would lose to Michigan two weeks later, and would rather have Penn State be undefeated when they play OSU so they can hype that game up. Your a moron, there was only one clear camera angle of Penix reaching in and it wasn't definitive since there was no way to see where the tip of the ball was when it hit the ground. If your going to have such strong opinions, at least make sure you understand how replay review works clown.