Then the question is, how can you support someone who is guilty of constitutional crimes and isn’t fit to serve? You will vote for him over literally anyone who wouldn’t try to overthrow the government?
I’ve changed my mind.
- Thread starter snarlcakes
- Start date
The more they claim they're talking about Harris's supposed failures, the less time they have to talk about Trump's failures.
If Trump was kicking ass, they'd surely only be talking about how impressive Trump is.
woah that's quite the leap. i don't think he attempted to overthrow the government. i htink he genuinely believed that there was foul play as he is a classic narcissist and availed himself of the legal system. because the election wasn't rigged the cases were summarily disposed. i understand how the system works and he would not be able to "overthrow the government." that's a combination of hyperbole and paranoia. he's a dogshit candidate who i will still vote for over a progressive. had the dem nom been shapiro or someone else that wouldn't be the case
Lmao. And you call me dumb. Ffs, dip$hit. He has said on numerous occasions that he lost. He KNOWS and KNEW that he lost. His AG, literally every WH lawyer, and scores of staff told him that he lost. Bill Barr told him that his claims were (verbatim) “bull$hit”. More than once. Barr resigned his post, literally weeks before his term would end, because he knew that Trump was going to do what he ultimately did.
Voting for Trump is the definition of unamerican. He should be in jail and after he loses in November, he’ll be going there. Then maybe, just maybe, the GOP can move on to a sane candidate who isn’t the biggest snowflake, whinya$$, loser in the history of American politics.
Ahh, my point got lost. To @snarlcakes - sure and I don't disagree. @crazed_hoosier2 - mostly agree.
But my point is that the government themselves will have to change these policies. And that's assuming people that really want to change these policies and have the werewithal to make that happen outside of the vacuum of social media or disconnected academic circles can get elected to Congress.
But, like most high powered organizations in the world, Congress has investigated itself and found no wrong doing. They won't change. I'm on record as saying nothing really will change without cataclysm. Unfortunately, something needs to stir the pot. Think 9/11. We didn't deal with islamic terrorism until we were really, really forced to. I don't know why our budget and economic policies are any different. And considering in the last 25 years we've had the dot.com bubble burst, housing collapse, markets nearly die as a result, and a global pandemic which shut down the economy - I'd say the triggering event knocking us off our lazy perch is gonna be pretty ****ing bad. Also, we're 39 trilliion in debt. Frogs in a pot.
All of us.
he availed himself of the legal process and lost. that is not overthrowing the government. again he didn't hole up in dc with a militia and arms. he went to palm beach and filed lawsuits. do you not understand that difference?
was his rhetoric awful? of course. is he a whiny, lying bitch. for sure. still better than progressive policies
Oh, I’m sorry. I get it. You’re just a POS. People like you have no business voting, driving or especially owning a firearm because you have no moral compass. None. What are the progressive policies? That all people in this country are equal? Even LGBTQ. That the federal or state government has no right to knowledge about a woman’s healthcare or her decisions about her body? That Christianity (or any religion) has no place in government? $hit like that?
Are you shaking right now? Yikes.
progressive policies:
defund police, bail projects, excess stimulus, equity of outcomes not opportunity, redistribution etc. her body or the child's body. there are two you know? or don't you.
you're revealing yourself as a far left radical whack job here. but being aligned with tmp scans. low information strong progressive feelings. And as for the pos comment I’ll put my volunteer work up against yours any day
I certainly wouldn't rule out more major black swan economic shocks. But, whether we have those or not or whether they're enough to make Congress find religion, I do think we're likely to see significantly lower rates of growth in coming decades -- something akin to what Japan has experienced going back to the early 90s.
However, if there's one thing coming into the fold that might actually move the needle in our favor on this, it's AI. I don't know how profound the economic benefit of it is going to have or how it will manifest. But I am pretty sure that it's going to be a game changer that might help alleviate some of the pain of the reckoning we're facing.
As I told you before. You’re just bleating emotions. But don’t do it with me. I have far more education and experience than you. Stay on the bench with the drug addicts.
Nobody wants to defund the police. Ffs, Trump wants to get rid of the FBI. Does your dumb ass know how much local law enforcement relies on them? Excess stimulus and the rest…. You’re right. You don’t watch dumb Fux News. You’re watching more radical shit that that. I’m far less a far left whack job than you are a WAY far right wing whack job. This country is about equality for everybody. EVERYBODY. If you don’t like that, then GTFO, Nazi. Your volunteer work. Lmao. Sure. You want to tell us how many black or Hispanic friends you have?
defund already took place and was later corrected as yet another dumbass hoosierdug idea. i know more about local law enforcement than you will ever know. you want me to list the excess stimulus? do you want a report from the fed? or do you wish to just remain willfully ignorant? because this post you have here is about as dumb as it gets. black i live in an extremely diverse community so many? hispanic. i've played in an all hispanic league for more than 20 years. many of my closest friends are hispanic. you're stereotyping and really showing your ass now. and you're beginning to bore me bc of it.
as i said. lots of energy. low on knowledge. the board doesn't need you
Ok ok hear me out.
Nobody wants to defund the police. Correct, they (assuming the left here) wants the police to behave and act according to their prescription.
Trump wants to get rid of the FBI. Incorrect, Trump wants the FBI to behave and act according to his prescription.
Maybe we should debate it without hyperbole on both sides.
And, don't forget -- he fired up a mob and said he would march to the Capitol with them, that they should "fight like hell" to "persuade" Mike Pence to "do the right thing," and sat on his ass for several hours after his daughter told him it was out of control and he should say something to defuse the riot.
Trump's excusers will try to point to the part of his speech where they say he said to act "peacefully." That doesn't work. He doesn't get to fire up a mob and then tell them both "fight like hell" and "be peaceful" and then let them pick which one they think he wants (wink wink) them to be.
Trump could have defused Jan 6 quite a bit (had he wanted to).
Good. We’ll continue your education. With effort. In about 20 years. you might get waitlisted at CoH U
Their prescription is to follow up on information they are given. Your statement, even though it was a mistake on your part, was/is accurate. Trump wanted/wants the FBI to act on HIS prescription. Not on where the facts and law lead. Because of that idiot, a friend from HS left the FBI because of the death threats, etc. No POTUS in the history of the FBI has done more to undermine it than Donald J Trump. If anyone was really interested in getting to the bottom of what and why Jan 6th happened, they should both watch the inquiry into it and the trial should happen. It should’ve happened before the election, but as he always does, Trump sought to delay it. As it is, we will learn some info in the filings prior to the election.
Nah. I’m not into cults that get off by fellating a morbidly obese, narcissistic, supposed billionaire, con man.
Defund the police was such a shitty slogan that whoever came up with it should market Twitter so it will die.
Police should police. We need more services to deal with the mental health issues plaguing the country. But, it's often left to police. Who aren't counselors and shouldn't be.
Agree on Trump. On Jan 6 alone, he's disqualified. Let alone all the other bullshit.
Nor am I. The problem is you want to scream. In frustration. And stereotype and generalize. But like tmp who we’ve mistaken you for; you’re uninformed so reduced to your post above. That doesn’t really lend itself to debate/discussion. You’d be better off doing push-ups than logging on here.
Last edited:
You’re probably there a few weeks early but that part of the woods is spectacular after the leaves change.
It wasn’t just a slogan tho. Budgets were cut. In blue cities all over the country. This wasn’t a fiction or propaganda. It occurred. And was reversed in many
As it should have been.
It was a flash in the pan bad idea that won't resurface any time soon. Reopen the mental hospitals.
No offense to you bc it’s not your fault that you weren’t here but it has been posted and demonstrated and argued about so many times in the past. I’m not going through it again. With new posters we end up in this endless loop on the board
Cities cut budgets. Allocated to different things. The attack on cops depleted ranks with early retirements and resignations. Crime spiked. Then cities re-allocated money.
Last edited:
As I recall, Trump had communication with some of the more interesting participants before Jan. 6.
Plus, she's not Trump, not Hawley, not Clarence Thomas, not Alioto, not McConnell, not Graham, not Mike (what's his name?), not Bobo and on and on and on.
She's there because she already was vice president (plus high state offices in California).
She’s there bc she’s a black female. The identity pick. She had zero chance on her own
Similar threads
