I'm just saying that if sports writers felt an action of Knight's didn't fit their agenda, that Knight is a big ogre who should be brought down to his knees, they didn't include it in their report. In other words, their take of the incident was slanted against him. I never said it was or wasn't deserved, I just said it happened, as it happens, yet today, with politics. It's human nature to want to see the mighty fail, hence the abuse we see today against the top "one percent" (or is it the top 2% now and lucky for those between 2% and 3%, if so) in wealth, like they're supposed to be shunned now instead of praised. It makes us feel better about ourselves when those perceived as superior to us, fail. A lot of sportswriters today have a chip on their shoulders. They think they're underpaid, printed copy is going the way of the dinosaurs, and they're constantly being judged by their work with criticism. It's not an easy life, but then, whose life is? (as I sit here sipping my Oat Milk Honey Latte with Starbucks Blonde espresso)