ADVERTISEMENT

Hari Seldon is coming

Is Hari a porn star I don't know about?
unicorn-gif-8.gif
 
Look out for The Mule.
I was listening to a history podcast and they mentioned The Foundation series. Said the Galactic Empire and its fall was modeled on Rome, and that the Mule might have represented Mohammed and the Islamic forces that came out of Arabia.

Also, for Asimov fans, I'm reading a two-volume non-fiction work of his on the Bible. He goes through it book by book, telling you where the stories might have come from, linking them to ancient non-biblical history, etc. based on the best biblical and archaeological scholarship at the time. It's really fascinating.

An example: the two oldest versions we have of Genesis have slight differences in them. In one (I think the older) the word for God is actually the plural form, and some biblical scholars think this shows the evolution of the Hebrew religion from plural deities to monotheism.

Another: the long lineage of Jesus contained in Matthew contains some prostitutes.
 
I was listening to a history podcast and they mentioned The Foundation series. Said the Galactic Empire and its fall was modeled on Rome, and that the Mule might have represented Mohammed and the Islamic forces that came out of Arabia.

Also, for Asimov fans, I'm reading a two-volume non-fiction work of his on the Bible. He goes through it book by book, telling you where the stories might have come from, linking them to ancient non-biblical history, etc. based on the best biblical and archaeological scholarship at the time. It's really fascinating.

An example: the two oldest versions we have of Genesis have slight differences in them. In one (I think the older) the word for God is actually the plural form, and some biblical scholars think this shows the evolution of the Hebrew religion from plural deities to monotheism.

Another: the long lineage of Jesus contained in Matthew contains some prostitutes.
It's not "versions" of Genesis, but rather sources. The Torah is made up of different discrete blocks of text that have their own linguistic characteristics, and that has allowed scholars to separate them into their original parts*. This is still the most accept form of textual criticism of the OT, but when Asimov wrote that, this was especially true. The sources are called J, E, D, and P, and the first two refer to the distinct names they use for God: J (Jahweh) and E (Elohim). Technically, Elohim is a plural form. That's what Asimov is referring to, the possibility that one of the names for God originally was a collective name for "the gods."

*See: documentary hypothesis for more info
 
  • Like
Reactions: BradStevens
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT