Nice ...
Crusader Kings 3. But if you want to do a proper run in Spain, you gotta shell out for the Iberia-focused DLC, too. It's not as fun with just the base game.
My last serious GF said I played too many video games. But then she drunkenly stole my cell phone and dropped it in a grease trap in the kitchen downstairs, so she had other stuff going on.
I don’t know what this means but I find it hilarious.
It most localities, it is illegal for restaurants to dump grease or oil down the drain, so grills are built with grease traps - large buckets, effectively - that you pull out and empty into a special dumpster, which you pay a special company to come empty out every few months. It's one of the grossest parts of any restaurant. She dumped my phone in it.
She was obviously too hot.
Hahahaha. Love it. I've been maced at close range. More miserable than any break, anything else. Just hell
Girl was straight nuts. Slapped my face and my glasses flew across the room. Embarrassed herself and me in many bars. But there was something about her...probably all the conversations that started with, "So, you know what I heard could be hot?"
I’m sure you didn’t do anything and were totally blameless. No doubt in my mind.
Are you kidding? We know he had classified documents, to include TS/SCI. He shouldn’t have had them and they weren’t secured as they’re required to be secured. This is identical to the HRC situation except in quantity - Trump mishandled even more classified documents and they were clearly marked as well. It’s indefensible, yet you defend it. That’s pure hypocrisy. I honestly don’t understand the hold that Trump has over you. He doesn’t give two shits about you or the country. I don’t get it.
Pound for pound the best video on YouTube. Can’t believe they still have it up.
I haven't defended anything, except the presumption of innocence until proven guilty, which is a bedrock of the US judicial system. I guess that doesn't matter to you - you'd gladly destroy the legal system to drag Trump to prison.
What was your stance on HRC? Did you presume she was innocent? If your answer for either question is different than they are for Trump, you’re a hypocrite.
My stance of HRC was that the DOJ should have pursued it more, based on known facts.
headlineusa.com
Uh no, I am not relying on media reports, I’m relying on my knowledge of the requirements for protecting classified information. Apparently, you don’t have much knowledge of the subject.My stance of HRC was that the DOJ should have pursued it more, based on known facts.
Did I think she was guilty? Yes. Did I say she should be barred from office or locked up without a trail? No, I didn't. And I based my opinion on the facts present by Comey and the FBI. You are relying on media reports that Trump didn't have a right to have those documents.
I also didn't complain when Bill Clinton hid classified documents in his sock drawer.
'Personal' Items from Bill Clinton's Sock Drawer May Unravel FBI's Mar-a-Lago Raid Case | Headline USA
(Tony Sifert, Headline USA) The Biden Justice Department’s partisan Mar-a-Lago fishing expedition will run into a Clinton-era legal snag, according to a report by Just the News’s John Solomon. Judge’s ruling over audio tapes hidden in Bill Clinton’s sock drawer could significantly impact Donald...
Again, you calling anyone else a hypocrite is laughable.
I held a Top Secret - Cryptological Clearance, so I know quite a bit about it.
nypost.com
Except for one big difference, Hillarys were on an electronic device while she was in an active position vs old papers stored in a house in a gated residence. Hackers had no way to get to them. You think Hillary or Biden even give one shit about you or this country?
Another fact @Aloha Hoosier leaves out is that Hillary wasn't President.
I still hold a TS clearance. How many years ago did you have one? Decades? In any event, your posts indicate that you aren’t current on requirements.I held a Top Secret - Cryptological Clearance, so I know quite a bit about it.
I also know that you don't know whether or not Trump legally held those documents and I also know what was done to previous ex-Presidents who illegally held classified documents.
You also thought he was guilty of colluding with Russians and were proved wrong about that, so pardon me if I laugh at your presumptions. You've been on the wrong side for the last 6 years.
You're fooling no one with your biased opinion. You have selective outrage and you calling anyone out for hypocrisy is laughable.
Obama trucked millions of documents to Chicago and promised to work with the National Archives to digitize them - 6 years ago. Where is your outrage about those records being outside the National Archives?
There’s no sainthood for Obama, National Archives in Trump FBI raid uproar
At this point, National Archives bureaucrats seem to have adapted the early motto of National Review, standing “athwart history, yelling Stop.” But as Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wisely warn…
As much as I despise HRC and couldn’t, and didn’t vote for her, yes I think she cares more for the country than Trump. So does Biden. Of course I don’t agree wit much of what Biden has done, I don’t doubt his patriotism. Trump is clearly not a patriot IMO, he’s just duped some to believe he is. Trump cares about himself and just about everyone else can go to hell as far as he’s concerned.
No I don’t ignore it. First, he’s not President. Second, even the President can’t just waive his magic Presidential wand and say, “I hereby declare everything declassified. That’s not how the process works. You seem to want a King, not a President - as long as it is King Donald I.
Debunked by liberal media only - which you believe without question.
He was President and he declassified many documents before he wasn't.
You think grifter Trump cared about this country? He wouldn't even bow out graciously when he lost. In fact, he had his loser followers attack our country
Para 1 - nonsense.
There is no evidence he declassified any of these. There is a process and a record required for declassification. Besides, it’s one of four or five ridiculously stupid and conflicting explanations provided by Trump. That’s the extent of your “evidence.” You apparently can’t see it, but Trump is a bigger liar than Bill Clinton, and he was a serial liar.
Sentence 1 - non-response because you have no argument
One point to make, he did not claim to declassify in January, nor in June when served a subpoena. One would think he wouldn't wait until the 3rd FBI visit to pull out the "I declassified everything" line.
There's no evidence he didn't declassify them. You know so much - what document does he file with..... himself. He IS the Executive Branch.
