ADVERTISEMENT

Chairman of Joint Chiefs thought Trump might attempt a legit coup

#1, I'm not your friend.

#2. Aloha is a never-Trumper and I don't think he'd dispute that

#3. I don't post here for 'Republicans'. I think for myself, which you should try sometime.

#4. Why can't you just stick to your Goat alter-ego?
1. Please reconsider!
2. If true, that's to his credit. To use your metaphor, it means he didn't drink the kool-ade.
3. You think for yourself? Thanks for the laugh.
4. I don't know what that means. But, then again, most of what you post makes no sense.

Try harder. You can do it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
1. Please reconsider!
2. If true, that's to his credit. To use your metaphor, it means he didn't drink the kool-ade.
3. You think for yourself? Thanks for the laugh.
4. I don't know what that means. But, then again, most of what you post makes no sense.

Try harder. You can do it!

Self reflection is lost on him.
 
You don't think the government would ever round up people and put them in a camp?

How about anti-vaxers? How about confining anyone who didn't have a vaccine?

Don't think it can't happen. The media would be more than glad to justify it.

Not to bring up another "Naxi" point, but most of the world didn't think Germany - considered one of the most civilized countries on earth - would ever round up certain citizens for mass murder.
So long as we have good lawyers and an independent judiciary we are fine. The first thing a tyrannical government must do is “kill all the lawyers .”
 
Not sure what your point is, but my point remains as I said several times. Civil authority is the bulwark against a Trump overreach in power, and Milley’s concern that Trump would stay in the WH or use force to stay in office after January 20 was lunacy. Giving Milley the benefit of the doubt, maybe he is simply ignorant of how the civil system works.
Wasn't the Jan 6 insurrection an attempt to disrupt the process of the Civil Authority? Apparently, Trump actually believed that Pence could somehow (outside the framework of the Constitution) just refuse to certify results and declare the votes of millions of people null and void, and just allow the pro-Trump Legislatures to arbitrarily decide who the winner was.

You can't constrain someone from an "overreach of power" if the person doesn't even have a basic grasp of the limits of their own "power". And you certainly can't take for granted that such an ignorant egomaniac will respect the limits of their "authority" on their own...
 
So long as we have good lawyers and an independent judiciary we are fine. The first thing a tyrannical government must do is “kill all the lawyers .”
Not to knock your profession (well, I guess I am), but lawyers don't mean squat if judges are corrupt.

And there are a lot of corrupt judges.

And, not to beat a dead horse, but lawyers had no effect on FDR's decision.

I don't think it will happen, either. But it could, and to ignore the possibility is foolish.
 
Wasn't the Jan 6 insurrection an attempt to disrupt the process of the Civil Authority? Apparently, Trump actually believed that Pence could somehow (outside the framework of the Constitution) just refuse to certify results and declare the votes of millions of people null and void, and just allow the pro-Trump Legislatures to arbitrarily decide who the winner was.

You can't constrain someone from an "overreach of power" if the person doesn't even have a basic grasp of the limits of their own "power". And you certainly can't take for granted that such an ignorant egomaniac will respect the limits of their "authority" on their own..
jan 6 was a rally that gave rise to an impromptu march to the capitol by a collection of low iq idiots that the left is now using to characterize as a concerted effort to prevent biden from becoming president. the absurdity of it all hasn't been lost on judges - the most recent ruling i read a judge ordered leniency in sentencing bc the guy thought the capitol was the white house and was way too stupid to ever plan or execute a coup. the Q shaman is undergoing a mental eval to see if he's even competent for trial. jan 6 is just more partisan bullshit. your side is worse no your side is
 
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Please get professional help. Those who have to deal with you on a regular basis (I pity those poor souls) will thank you.
https://www.hdnicewallpapers.com/Walls/Big/Other Animals/Animal_Goat_Wallpaper.jpg
Animal_Goat_Wallpaper.jpg
 
jan 6 was a rally that gave rise to an impromptu march to the capitol by a collection of low iq idiots that the left is now using to characterize as a concerted effort to prevent biden from becoming president. the absurdity of it all hasn't been lost on judges - the most recent ruling i read a judge ordered leniency in sentencing bc the guy thought the capitol was the white house and was way too stupid to ever plan or execute a coup. the Q shaman is undergoing a mental eval to see if he's even competent for trial. jan 6 is just more partisan bullshit. your side is worse no your side is
The only "impromptu" part of the proceedings was tens of thousands who were not involved in the planning joining groups like the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys who had discussed for days how to strategically plant weapons thruout DC. It's part of the Conspiracy charges against them...

"The government’s long-standing theory in the case is that the extremist group came prepared for violence on Jan. 6 and stashed firearms just outside of Washington, DC, which they could easily access via a “quick reaction force” or “QRF.” Until this week, though, prosecutors had shared little evidence other than text messages that referenced a special force. Wednesday’s hearing featured the government’s most comprehensive presentation to date that such a plan was at least partially put into action."


There were a hardcore group of planners and there were a much larger group of people who ended up at the Capitol as almost a reflexive action. But one of the main reasons people who should have known better got swept up, is because many of them were convinced that Pence could actually stop the election certification and chose not to do so. THAT type of misinformation being disseminated is directly attributable to Trump and his minions, and numerous speakers belabored that point during the speeches...

But even before the speeches, people associated with the militias were walking among the crowd and advising them to head to the Capitol after Trump's speech. That is captured perfectly in the NYT video, and is a perfect example of how the militias ramped up the crowd to unwittingly join them in what they had already planned.

Plenty of Oathkeepers types were already at the Capitol and no doubt took note of how lax the security was and the absence of serious law enforcement. It's not a coincidence that every one of the 8 or so breaches of the Capitol were initially provoked by dedicated militia types who incited others to join in...

Admittedly Jordan Klepper is a comedian, but he was in DC on Jan 6. And he captured video of plenty of militia types and extremists heading to the Capitol before Trump's speech was even over.

Trump's speech lasted till about 1 pm, while you can clearly see militia types organizing and heading to the Capitol en masse before 11 am. They were people on a mission who hoped the masses would join them. With help from provocateurs and Trump urging people to "walk to the Capitol" that's exactly what happened...

 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
The only "impromptu" part of the proceedings was tens of thousands who were not involved in the planning joining groups like the Oathkeepers and Proud Boys who had discussed for days how to strategically plant weapons thruout DC. It's part of the Conspiracy charges against them...

"The government’s long-standing theory in the case is that the extremist group came prepared for violence on Jan. 6 and stashed firearms just outside of Washington, DC, which they could easily access via a “quick reaction force” or “QRF.” Until this week, though, prosecutors had shared little evidence other than text messages that referenced a special force. Wednesday’s hearing featured the government’s most comprehensive presentation to date that such a plan was at least partially put into action."


There were a hardcore group of planners and there were a much larger group of people who ended up at the Capitol as almost a reflexive action. But one of the main reasons people who should have known better got swept up, is because many of them were convinced that Pence could actually stop the election certification and chose not to do so. THAT type of misinformation being disseminated is directly attributable to Trump and his minions, and numerous speakers belabored that point during the speeches...

But even before the speeches, people associated with the militias were walking among the crowd and advising them to head to the Capitol after Trump's speech. That is captured perfectly in the NYT video, and is a perfect example of how the militias ramped up the crowd to unwittingly join them in what they had already planned.

Plenty of Oathkeepers types were already at the Capitol and no doubt took note of how lax thelma security was and the absence of serious law enforcement. It's not a coincidence that every one of the 8 or so breaches of the Capitol were initially provoked by dedicated militia types who incited others to join in...

Admittedly Jordan Klepper is a comedian, but he was in DC on Jan 6. And he captured video of plenty of militia types and extremists heading to the Capitol before Trump's speech was even over.

Trump's speech lasted till about 1 pm, while you can clearly see militia types organizing and heading to the Capitol en masse before 11 am. They were people on a mission who hoped the masses would join them. With help from provocateurs and Trump urging people to "walk to the Capitol" that's exactly what happened...

lmao all of these militias present yet one cap police shooting. yeah these well armed militias sure had the intent to take over. they were at applebees by 4 for happy hour pricing
 
With the rest of the tourists? :rolleyes:
many were but more accurately with the rest of the morons. i've written it a few times but the sentencing of some of these guys is pretty funny. as i said the one guy thought he was at the white house. the judge literally wrote this guy was too stupid to believe he was participating in an insurrection (semantics torpedo's that word). q shaman may be not be mentally competent enough to stand trial.

i don't doubt there were some there with nefarious intentions but i do believe this was impromptu for the vast majority of people who got caught up in a moment. these were not smart people. and i think lefties that are incapable of independent thought (outside/cosmic) use this as a means to say HA YOUR SIDE IS WORSE partisan nonsense. again if a militia was truly set on doing the things those guys believed it would have been an ugly, long, drawn out shootout involving more than cap police, many of whom were opening doors and taking selfies. i know a few right wing nut jobs. one has an arsenal that alone could have kept things going for hours and hours
 
  • Like
Reactions: CO. Hoosier
Wasn't the Jan 6 insurrection an attempt to disrupt the process of the Civil Authority? Apparently, Trump actually believed that Pence could somehow (outside the framework of the Constitution) just refuse to certify results and declare the votes of millions of people null and void, and just allow the pro-Trump Legislatures to arbitrarily decide who the winner was.

You can't constrain someone from an "overreach of power" if the person doesn't even have a basic grasp of the limits of their own "power". And you certainly can't take for granted that such an ignorant egomaniac will respect the limits of their "authority" on their own...
I don’t think there was an overall single purpose to January 6. No doubt some wanted to stop the certification but that was by no means all. After months of a concentrated full weight federal investigation, no charges regarding overthrow have been filed.

As far as disrupting civil authority is concerned, that happens regularly at the state and local government level, and often with greater effect. Dick Durban instigated a disruption of Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearing. As far as I know, the offending participantpants were simply escorted from the room and no charges were ever filed.

The Democrats overplay and exaggerate everything including claiming laws which SCOTUS has approved, and which poll favorably, are the greatest threat to democracy since the civil war. Milley is and was part of that.
 
you will be waiting a while. more likely to get another of his school photos.
I've posted a link and an explantation.

I'm sorry if you're too stupid to understand it.
 
Last edited:
many were but more accurately with the rest of the morons. i've written it a few times but the sentencing of some of these guys is pretty funny. as i said the one guy thought he was at the white house. the judge literally wrote this guy was too stupid to believe he was participating in an insurrection (semantics torpedo's that word). q shaman may be not be mentally competent enough to stand trial.

i don't doubt there were some there with nefarious intentions but i do believe this was impromptu for the vast majority of people who got caught up in a moment. these were not smart people. and i think lefties that are incapable of independent thought (outside/cosmic) use this as a means to say HA YOUR SIDE IS WORSE partisan nonsense. again if a militia was truly set on doing the things those guys believed it would have been an ugly, long, drawn out shootout involving more than cap police, many of whom were opening doors and taking selfies. i know a few right wing nut jobs. one has an arsenal that alone could have kept things going for hours and hours
Did these dumbasses have a snowball's chance of overthrowing the government? No.
Did some of these dumbasses think they could? Yes.
Did some of these dumbasses want to severely interrupt the election process for as long as possible? Yes.
Did some of these dumbasses have respect for our country? No.
Did some of these dumbasses interpret Trump's message as a call to do exactly what they did? Yes.
Did Trump know what could possibly happen? Yes.
Did Trump want what happened to happen? Yes.
Is Trump the least bit apologetic for what happened and his role in it? No.
Will some dumbasses on here bend over backwards to minimize the events of January 6? Uh, yes.

Dumbasses + purposeful agitation and permission to act out dumbass beliefs = exactly what happened.

One has to wonder what would have happened if the dumbasses hadn't finally been repulsed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
Did these dumbasses have a snowball's chance of overthrowing the government? No.
Did some of these dumbasses think they could? Yes.
Did some of these dumbasses want to severely interrupt the election process for as long as possible? Yes.
Did some of these dumbasses have respect for our country? No.
Did some of these dumbasses interpret Trump's message as a call to do exactly what they did? Yes.
Did Trump know what could possibly happen? Yes.
Did Trump want what happened to happen? Yes.
Is Trump the least bit apologetic for what happened and his role in it? No.

Dumbasses + purposeful agitation and permission to act out dumbass beliefs = exactly what happened.

One has to wonder what would have happened if the dumbasses hadn't finally been repulsed.
some being the operative word. i look at it a little differently tho. these weren't opportunistic people breaking into neiman & marcus during a protest. these were people engaging in a political act/demonstration for what they believed was "right" for the country. that the election had been stolen and that they were doing the patriotic thing. putin (insert joke) characterized it as US citizens coming to congress with political demands. certainly a bastardized view but sort of true. to them there was a nobility in their actions. this is another reason we are seeing and will continue to see leniency in sentencing for those charged

that we have citizens that are this gullible/stupid is a broader issue that imo is evidenced by the acts of jan 6. and i don't see the dumbing down of our country abating any time soon. i don't know. we're kind of a mess
 
Last edited:
some being the operative word. i look at it a little differently tho. these weren't opportunistic people breaking into neiman & marcus during a protest. these were people engaging in a political act/demonstration for what they believed was "right" for the country. that the election had been stolen and that they were doing the right thing. putin (insert joke) characterized it as US citizens coming to congress with political demands. certainly a bastardized view but sort of true. to them there was a nobility in their actions. this is another reason we are seeing and will continue to see leniency in sentencing for those charged

that we have citizens that are this gullible/stupid is a broader issue that imo is evidenced by the acts of jan 6. and i don't see the dumbing down of our country abating any time soon. i don't know. we're kind of a mess
By some, I mean all the dumbasses climbing around, on, and in the Capitol. The non-dumbasses were those that said, "Holy crap, those guys are dumbasses. I'm leaving." The ones who stayed - 100% dumbass.
 
By some, I mean all the dumbasses climbing around, on, and in the Capitol. The non-dumbasses were those that said, "Holy crap, those guys are dumbasses. I'm leaving."
right but some of those "dumbasses" were americans who thought they were doing the patriotic thing for their country. dumb as that may have been.
 
Last edited:
right but some of those "dumbasses" were americans who thought they were doing the right thing for their country. if i was sitting on the bench i'd sympathize. i'd admonish but sympathize
Irrelevant. There is aa clear demarcation between those who were criminally dumbassed, and those who knew better.
 
Irrelevant. There is aa clear demarcation between those who were criminally dumbassed, and those who knew better.
oh still against the law regardless. it's the intent i sympathize with a bit. some thought they were being patriotic. not all offenses are the same
 
oh still against the law regardless. it's the intent i sympathize with a bit. some thought they were being patriotic. not all offenses are the same
A true patriot would have bothered to educate himself enough to know he was being a criminal. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
I doubt if Mr. Podium Thief was being patriotic.
Oh, and what country was Mr. Confederate flag being patriotic towards? Real patriots would have beaten the shit out of those guys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
A true patriot would have bothered to educate himself enough to know he was being a criminal. Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
I doubt if Mr. Podium Thief was being patriotic.
Oh, and what country was Mr. Confederate flag being patriotic towards? Real patriots would have beaten the shit out of those guys.
again you are presupposing intellect that isnt there and is being recognized by judges
 
I've posted a link and an explantation.

I'm sorry if you're too stupid to understand it.
A link and an "explantation" of what, Danny? Certainly nothing supporting your ridiculous and unpatriotic assertion that China could "blow the US Navy out of the water."

Link and explanation, please.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
No, I'm presupposing a total lack of intellect, and it's irrelevant. Jails are full of dumbasses.
it's not irrelevant at all. jails are full of dumbasses - fortunately judges weigh many factors in sentencing. to me doing something you believe to be patriotic (regardless of how inane) is different than robbing neiman marcus despite it's classification being the same.
 
it's not irrelevant at all. jails are full of dumbasses - fortunately judges weigh many factors in sentencing. to me doing something you believe to be patriotic (regardless of how inane) is different than robbing neiman marcus despite it's classification being the same.
Neiman Marcus hardly equals the United States Capitol. Does that fit into your equation anywhere?
 
Neiman Marcus hardly equals the United States Capitol. Does that fit into your equation anywhere?
it does - one is a patriotic political act and the other isn't - it's just common criminality

and i'll add i'm assuming these people genuinely believed the election was stolen
 
it's not irrelevant at all. jails are full of dumbasses - fortunately judges weigh many factors in sentencing. to me doing something you believe to be patriotic (regardless of how inane) is different than robbing neiman marcus despite it's classification being the same.
I generally like your posts, mcmurtry, even when I disagree with them, but I think you're way off base here. Congress was in session on January 6, and purported patriotism is not going to be viewed as a mitigating factor at sentencing for the people who entered the building.

A guy from Florida recently entered a plea to a felony count of storming the Capitol to obstruct Congress' certification of the election. At the time of his plea, the guy's attorney offered to the judge that "there's no justification for January 6. That's why he's standing up and entering a plea of guilty. He acknowledges what he did was wrong, and there's no excuses for it." Prosecutors in this case, which is apparently being watched very closely, agreed to give the defendant credit for accepting responsibility, pleading in a timely fashion, and paying compensation. As part of the plea agreement, he's looking at just 15 to 21 months.

200 other people are similarly charged with obstructing an official proceeding of Congress. Conviction carries serious jail time (up to 20 years). GIven this threat of heavy jail time, it's likely we'll see many more pleas, with people accepting responsibility as this guy did. The "but I'm a patriot!" defense is not going to fly, either at trial or sentencing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
I generally like your posts, mcmurtry, even when I disagree with them, but I think you're way off base here. Congress was in session on January 6, and purported patriotism is not going to be viewed as a mitigating factor at sentencing for the people who entered the building.

A guy from Florida recently entered a plea to a felony count of storming the Capitol to obstruct Congress' certification of the election. At the time of his plea, the guy's attorney offered to the judge that "there's no justification for January 6. That's why he's standing up and entering a plea of guilty. He acknowledges what he did was wrong, and there's no excuses for it." Prosecutors in this case, which is apparently being watched very closely, agreed to give the defendant credit for accepting responsibility, pleading in a timely fashion, and paying compensation. As part of the plea agreement, he's looking at just 15 to 21 months.

200 other people are similarly charged with obstructing an official proceeding of Congress. Conviction carries serious jail time (up to 20 years). GIven this threat of heavy jail time, it's likely we'll see many more pleas, with people accepting responsibility as this guy did. The "but I'm a patriot!" defense is not going to fly, either at trial or sentencing.
of course it will matter - to what extent who knows. judges are free to consider almost anything that justifies reducing a criminal defendant's sentence. as i said one judge has already reduced sentence for a defendant bc he thought he was at the white house. if you commit a crime of hte same classification of robbing neiman marcus versus storming the capitol in belief of political injustice i promise you many judges will factor in same as mitigation. stupidity doesn't save you from conviction but it helps in sentencing mitigation
 
of course it will matter - to what extent who knows. judges are free to consider almost anything that justifies reducing a criminal defendant's sentence. as i said one judge has already reduced sentence for a defendant bc he thought he was at the white house. if you commit a crime of hte same classification of robbing neiman marcus versus storming the capitol in belief of political injustice i promise you many judges will factor in same as mitigation
What was he charged with? And was he inside the Capitol? I guarantee "patriotism" will not be a mitigating factor for people who were inside and are charged with obstruction of Congress.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IU_Hickory
I generally like your posts, mcmurtry, even when I disagree with them, but I think you're way off base here. Congress was in session on January 6, and purported patriotism is not going to be viewed as a mitigating factor at sentencing for the people who entered the building.

A guy from Florida recently entered a plea to a felony count of storming the Capitol to obstruct Congress' certification of the election. At the time of his plea, the guy's attorney offered to the judge that "there's no justification for January 6. That's why he's standing up and entering a plea of guilty. He acknowledges what he did was wrong, and there's no excuses for it." Prosecutors in this case, which is apparently being watched very closely, agreed to give the defendant credit for accepting responsibility, pleading in a timely fashion, and paying compensation. As part of the plea agreement, he's looking at just 15 to 21 months.

200 other people are similarly charged with obstructing an official proceeding of Congress. Conviction carries serious jail time (up to 20 years). GIven this threat of heavy jail time, it's likely we'll see many more pleas, with people accepting responsibility as this guy did. The "but I'm a patriot!" defense is not going to fly, either at trial or sentencing.
There is no one size fits all here. Some broke windows, entered restricted areas, and or destroyEd public property. Others walked unimpeded through the doors and wondered around public areas. Do we know what the Florida defendant actually did?
 
  • Like
Reactions: mcmurtry66
What was he charged with? And was he inside the Capitol? I guarantee "patriotism" will not be a mitigating factor for people who were inside and are charged with obstruction of Congress.
sorry i was wrong. yes he was one of hte first ones who breached the door to the capitol
and apparently was brandishing a knife. by accounts he was one of hte main offenders. q and all that shit. he wasn't sentenced (i was wrong) he was released and put on home detention and the judge noted that his lack of awareness as to where he was played a role in his release to home detention and that same evidenced the fact that he couldn't have planned the attack.

again judges can factor in anything they want at sentencing and like this case above (altho not sentencing yet) i trust they will.

 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT