ADVERTISEMENT

Carroll wins. Millions in damages.

Women are to be believed, right? Just not when they come forward right after the fact and are conservative. Crazy liberals 30 years after the fact with no evidence and a story that makes zero sense we'll you're a misogynist if you don't believe them.

Haha. Still sticking with the old Tara Reade story. You can believe and investigate. Her story was found not to be believable and it certainly was not a pattern of behavior, as it obviously is for Trump. But nice try.
 
Who do you think his trophy wife is?


(Still want me around?)

PS. Abrax is a POS who doesn't deserve your time. Leave him alone, and he'll slither back under his rock.
He acts like he’s writing some old disgusting porn stuff. And he thinks he’s funny.
 
Imagine being so insecure, feeling that you need to brag about your significant other's looks on a message board.

I've often found that people who feel the need to brag about having a hot girlfriend/wife to a group of people who have no way of verifying that are very likely lying...or at the very least exaggerating. Or they're living with constant beer goggles. Or the head trauma is clouding their judgement.
What if you had a super hot girlfriend but they left you?
 
You've seen her videos and you think she's his type? lmao That woman is not any guy's type unless he likes crazy.

And what I posted was true - you just don't like the truth.

That woman is a nut job and nothing but a gold digger. But, after 30 years, dupes like you take what she says as gospel.
Dude the rape occurred when she was 50, a Manhattan socilaite married to an NBC News anchor and looked remarkably like his own wife Marla Maples. In fact when he was asked to point her out in the pic he said that she wasn't in the pic, and that he was standing next to his wife Marla. When EJC's lawyer asked him to point out Marla, he pointed to EJC and declared she was Marla.

No one said he fell in love with her, just that he forced himself on her.He mistook her for his wife in the photo, so clearly the physical attraction (enough to force himself on her) was there. In fact oddly enough all the women who have accused him of sexual assault have looked remarkably similar to each other at the time they alledge the respective assaults happened...

One of the women who testified before the jury in the earlier EJC trial was Jessica Leeds...

"Leeds said she was in her late 30s and working in sales when she was invited by a flight attendant aboard a daytime flight from Dallas or Atlanta to New York to sit in the only empty aisle seat in the first-class cabin.

“The gentleman sitting by the window introduced himself as Donald Trump,” she said.


Conversation between the pair was mostly forgettable, Leeds recalled, as they ate a nice meal, before “all of a sudden Trump decided to kiss me and grope me.”

“There was no conversation. It was like out of the blue. It was like a tussle. He was trying to kiss me, trying to pull me towards him. He was grabbing my breasts. It was like he had 40 zillion hands. It was like a tussling match between the two of us,” she recalled.

Leeds said the standoff ended when she realized no aircraft employees were coming to the rescue and Trump seemed to get more aggressive.

“It was when he started putting his hand up my skirt that gave me strength. I managed to wriggle out of my seat and storm back to my seat in coach. I don’t think there was a word or a sound made by either one of us,” she recalled."


If you don't see the epitome of playboy Trump (long before he became your hero) in that story I don't know what to tell you...
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Bill4411
https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/the-underreporting-and-dismissal-of-sexual-assault-cases-against-women-in-the-united-states#:~:text=Approximately 31% of rapes are,every 3 rapes go unreported.&text=To put that into perspective,of 3 crimes going unreported. I’m under no delusion that you will pay any attention to actual facts, but only 31% of rapes get reported. People like you are one of the reasons why. Because the women get ridiculed, doubted, and criticized. It’s easier to not do so than made to relive it all over again.
You think maybe it’s something of low report because oftentimes a woman leads a man on and/or puts herself in that position? It’s like the Mike Tyson “rape” in Indy’s Canterbury Hotel. The Miss America contestant went up to Tyson’s room. Why, to play Parcheesi? Under testimony she was asked how long he performed cunnilingus. She said 10 min! Any man with any technique at all will tell you that’s way too long. The tongue gets tired and fresh air is required. That was no rape. It was opportunity!
 
I do still want you around.
d66a79491d4f3636ad405cb6e51e8941.gif
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BradStevens
You think maybe it’s something of low report because oftentimes a woman leads a man on and/or puts herself in that position? It’s like the Mike Tyson “rape” in Indy’s Canterbury Hotel. The Miss America contestant went up to Tyson’s room. Why, to play Parcheesi? Under testimony she was asked how long he performed cunnilingus. She said 10 min! Any man with any technique at all will tell you that’s way too long. The tongue gets tired and fresh air is required. That was no rape. It was opportunity!
Yeah no man on earth could do that for ten minutes. And this is why the sol is vital to preserve evidence. She’d be covered in orange and when trump walked out he’d look like a dreamsickle.

Like when Ron Swanson got big chunks of his mustache rubbed off with his ex
 
Women are to be believed, right? Just not when they come forward right after the fact and are conservative. Crazy liberals 30 years after the fact with no evidence and a story that makes zero sense we'll you're a misogynist if you don't believe them.

Now show us the judge/jury that agreed with her

Marketing I Cant Even GIF by Similarweb
 
Does it still count as bragging?
Eh...not really?

I need more context. Abraxis was trying to one-up someone here. I think there's a difference between saying someone is legitimately hot as a matter of fact and someone trying to get a dig in on someone else by saying someone they're dating is hotter than anyone you could hope to date.
 
Imagine being so insecure, feeling that you need to brag about your significant other's looks on a message board.

I've often found that people who feel the need to brag about having a hot girlfriend/wife to a group of people who have no way of verifying that are very likely lying...or at the very least exaggerating. Or they're living with constant beer goggles. Or the head trauma is clouding their judgement.
You need to learn to be more succinct.

"Pics or it's a blow-up doll"

We have rules around here after all.
 
Imagine being so insecure, feeling that you need to brag about your significant other's looks on a message board.

I've often found that people who feel the need to brag about having a hot girlfriend/wife to a group of people who have no way of verifying that are very likely lying...or at the very least exaggerating. Or they're living with constant beer goggles. Or the head trauma is clouding their judgement.
I only said it because I was accused of being single. Male friends have teased me for marrying a “trophy wife,” a younger woman of fine features and one who exercises regularly…more than my lazy ass probably deserves.
 
I only said it because I was accused of being single. Male friends have teased me for marrying a “trophy wife,” a younger woman of fine features and one who exercises regularly…more than my lazy ass probably deserves.
I know that world well. Hold onto her until your knuckles turn white my friend

Oh and getting her pregnant doesn’t mean she’ll stay
 
Eh...not really?

I need more context. Abraxis was trying to one-up someone here. I think there's a difference between saying someone is legitimately hot as a matter of fact and someone trying to get a dig in on someone else by saying someone they're dating is hotter than anyone you could hope to date.
Need a list of topics that are/arent douchey to brag about.

Does the owning and current wearing of a luxuriously soft cashmere shawl collar cardigan count?

How about the ability to build stairs? Where you got your degree from? You car? Your penis size? The size of your social security check?

Probably depends on the guy doing it and their general demeanor, I guess.

Sorry, gotta go. My supermodel wife wants me to drive her to our country club in our 100k+ Rivian truck and my gorgeous, Mensa children need help loading up their cellos for the upcoming performance. Toodaloo.
 
Dude the rape occurred when she was 50, a Manhattan socilaite married to an NBC News anchor and looked remarkably like his own wife Marla Maples. In fact when he was asked to point her out in the pic he said that she wasn't in the pic, and that he was standing next to his wife Marla. When EJC's lawyer asked him to point out Marla, he pointed to EJC and declared she was Marla.

No one said he fell in love with her, just that he forced himself on her.He mistook her for his wife in the photo, so clearly the physical attraction (enough to force himself on her) was there. In fact oddly enough all the women who have accused him of sexual assault have looked remarkably similar to each other at the time they alledge the respective assaults happened...

One of the women who testified before the jury in the earlier EJC trial was Jessica Leeds...

"Leeds said she was in her late 30s and working in sales when she was invited by a flight attendant aboard a daytime flight from Dallas or Atlanta to New York to sit in the only empty aisle seat in the first-class cabin.

“The gentleman sitting by the window introduced himself as Donald Trump,” she said.


Conversation between the pair was mostly forgettable, Leeds recalled, as they ate a nice meal, before “all of a sudden Trump decided to kiss me and grope me.”

“There was no conversation. It was like out of the blue. It was like a tussle. He was trying to kiss me, trying to pull me towards him. He was grabbing my breasts. It was like he had 40 zillion hands. It was like a tussling match between the two of us,” she recalled.

Leeds said the standoff ended when she realized no aircraft employees were coming to the rescue and Trump seemed to get more aggressive.

“It was when he started putting his hand up my skirt that gave me strength. I managed to wriggle out of my seat and storm back to my seat in coach. I don’t think there was a word or a sound made by either one of us,” she recalled."


If you don't see the epitome of playboy Trump (long before he became your hero) in that story I don't know what to tell you...
Really funny that people actually think rape has something to do with attraction. 80 year old women get raped. The ignorance of so many men on the issue is astounding, isn’t it?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cosmickid
Need a list of topics that are/arent douchey to brag about.

Does the owning and current wearing of a luxuriously soft cashmere shawl collar cardigan count?

How about the ability to build stairs? Where you got your degree from? You car? Your penis size? The size of your social security check?

Probably depends on the guy doing it and their general demeanor, I guess.

Sorry, gotta go. My supermodel wife wants me to drive her to our country club in our 100k+ Rivian truck and my gorgeous, Mensa children need help loading up their cellos for the upcoming performance. Toodaloo.
As a rule of thumb, stay humble.

"My girlfriend/wife is hotter than anyone you could get/imagine" is a far cry from humble.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BradStevens
You think maybe it’s something of low report because oftentimes a woman leads a man on and/or puts herself in that position? It’s like the Mike Tyson “rape” in Indy’s Canterbury Hotel. The Miss America contestant went up to Tyson’s room. Why, to play Parcheesi? Under testimony she was asked how long he performed cunnilingus. She said 10 min! Any man with any technique at all will tell you that’s way too long. The tongue gets tired and fresh air is required. That was no rape. It was opportunity!
Like I said incel who knows nothing about women. Lol
 
Haha. Still sticking with the old Tara Reade story. You can believe and investigate. Her story was found not to be believable and it certainly was not a pattern of behavior, as it obviously is for Trump. But nice try.
Right. Tara was in her late 20s at the time so clearly about 2 decades too old for Joe.
 
....uttered to a politically biased jury of mostly woman?
His guilt was actually established by a jury of 6 men and 3 women. Damages by the second jury, 7 men & 2 women, as Mark said.

But something tells me that facts don't really matter to you

 
Uh, supposedly raped in a room full of partiers two nights in a row, yet no witnesses were to be found? He WAS proven innocent, otherwise he wouldn’t be sitting on the bench in a black gown.
lol you don’t even know the rudimentary facts of the case. You’re hopeless
 
Right. Tara was in her late 20s at the time so clearly about 2 decades too old for Joe.
I love how you gaslight and baselessly accuse Biden of things Trump has been proven guilty of. Like watching teenagers in pageants undress and bragging about it. Thats your guy! Be proud
 
Journalists seek to report objectively, in my mind. If they don't have journalistic objectivity, then they can't be called journalists.


Maddow does not have journalistic objectivity. She's never studied journalism, and never worked as a reporter, instead always working in the media as an on air personality opining from the left. This is the equivalent of a op-ed columnist on air with an extreme partisan bent. She is clearly biased and is not out collecting facts or broadcasting neutral pieces on air. Put another way, she is the left's version of Hannity or O'Reilly, although smarter and better able to support her arguments. But make no mistake, she's making arguments based on opinions and her particular left-leaning values.

That Fox and MSNBC have so degraded what otherwise intelligent people think of as a journalist is further evidence of the degradation of our political discourse and ability to think objectively about partisan topics.
When you say "Journalists seek to report objectively," you're only talking about the traditional role of reporters -- the editorial page of a traditional newspaper (non-reporters) was never required to be "objective." For them, it was always perfectly acceptable to present an opinion with support. Maddow is like an editorial page and presents support for her opinions, which makes her infinitely more objective than some others you know that I won't name right now.

What has changed is that nowadays anyone with a $500 used laptop and enough skill to make a barely-readable web page can present unsupported "opinions" with nothing at all to back them up and all that "content" gets repeated even though the subsequent media does nothing to vet it. A traditional hometown newspaper of, say, 20-30,000 circulation usually did more in the old days to confirm its locally-generated news than what we all are exposed to today on the internet or cable.

Whereas traditional newspapers usually had only one editorial page in a daily issue, what passes for "journalism" today is like a traditional newspaper that would consist 100% of endless editorial pages of blathering, with little or nothing to back it up.

Maddow is not as bad as you suggest.
 
When you say "Journalists seek to report objectively," you're only talking about the traditional role of reporters -- the editorial page of a traditional newspaper (non-reporters) was never required to be "objective." For them, it was always perfectly acceptable to present an opinion with support. Maddow is like an editorial page and presents support for her opinions, which makes her infinitely more objective than some others you know that I won't name right now.

What has changed is that nowadays anyone with a $500 used laptop and enough skill to make a barely-readable web page can present unsupported "opinions" with nothing at all to back them up and all that "content" gets repeated even though the subsequent media does nothing to vet it. A traditional hometown newspaper of, say, 20-30,000 circulation usually did more in the old days to confirm its locally-generated news than what we all are exposed to today on the internet or cable.

Whereas traditional newspapers usually had only one editorial page in a daily issue, what passes for "journalism" today is like a traditional newspaper that would consist 100% of endless editorial pages of blathering, with little or nothing to back it up.

Maddow is not as bad as you suggest.
That's what I said. Check my post.

I also said she has never trained or acted as a objective journalist or ever attempted to follow the concept of journalistic objectivity. If you get your news from her--the facts, to help you form your own opinion--you aren't getting the whole story.

She's a political commentator with her own show, and she lets her political beliefs color everything she says.
 
That's what I said. Check my post.

I also said she has never trained or acted as a objective journalist or ever attempted to follow the concept of journalistic objectivity. If you get your news from her--the facts, to help you form your own opinion--you aren't getting the whole story.

She's a political commentator with her own show, and she lets her political beliefs color everything she says.
There’s so much nuance as well. I listen to freedom radio sometimes driving to get the truth from the frontlines and it’s what they choose to cover and devote time to that shapes how people think. It’s not always that they aren’t factually accurate, it’s the oversized attention they give to some things while ignoring others
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT