Never assume that intelligence or even common sense has any influence on what DANC posts here.
another elementary school shooting
- Thread starter kurt cloverdales
- Start date
Fertilizer? Well, OK, but did you know that the ATF actually is permitted to restrict ownership of gunpowder despite the Second Amendment?
Is black powder subject to regulation under federal explosives laws? | Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives
Black powder is an explosive material for purposes of federal explosives laws and regulations. However, the law exempts from regulation commercially manufactured black powder in quantities not exceeding 50 pounds (as well as percussion caps, safety and pyrotechnic fuses, quills, quick and slow...
The NRA apparently doesn't care about this regulation.
Gunpowder existed in 1787, so there's no argument the Founding Fathers did not contemplate gunpowder when they enacted the Second Amendment:
"“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
No gun works without gunpowder. Duh.
This isn't directed at you, but if the purchase of gunpowder can be regulated by the feds without violating the Second Amendment then why/how is the Second Amendment always claimed to be such an impediment to serious gun control?
Maybe we ought to start supporting the police instead of trying to defund them.
I never said do nothing. The opposite, in fact.
But if you think if guns disappeared tomorrow there wouldn't be acts of mass murder, you're fooling yourself.
There would be a lot less acts of mass murder!
Is it a coincidence that states with the highest % of gun ownership have the highest % of deaths from guns? I don't think so.
The left needs to quit looking at criminals as potential voters! Example, The George Floyd circus!
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I spoke to three cops in last two days, one is federal. They’re all completely flummoxed. Confirmed that protocol is Go Go Go.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I actually agree that there would still be a few acts of mass murder without guns. But big deal.
That's still no reason to oppose more rigorous gun control, so why even bring it up (as you did) ??
You brought it up for some political reason.
You brought it up.
You brought it up. Why?
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I’d have to imagine most honest LEOs would tell you in private that civilians shouldn’t have military grade hardware.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
As I pointed out, it only takes 1 Oklahoma city to equal 15 Uvaldes.
But feel free to ignore that little tidbit.
Just answer the question, because I don't know wtf you're talking about.
Can you imagine being a parent of one of those kids that died hearing about this stuff. After the shock wears off in a few weeks, or decades
Deny it? No, I"m proud of it. What's your problem with it? That it's factual?
"I never said do nothing. The opposite, in fact.
But if you think if guns disappeared tomorrow there wouldn't be acts of mass murder, you're fooling yourself."
**** cnn for interviewing a damn 11 year old about this horrible act.
[/QUOTE]
The media is garbage. We don't need to hear interviews from 11 year olds. I like how in sports they stopped showing the prick who runs onto the field.
[/QUOTE]
The media is garbage. We don't need to hear interviews from 11 year olds. I like how in sports they stopped showing the prick who runs onto the field.
They could’ve removed that part and it wouldn’t change the series. It’s bad taste and don’t think for a minute if a conservative outlet put it out they would’ve been blasted for it. It’s very hypocritical.
A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I mean it’s the basic story of what happened to the Jedi. It was shown in Episode III also. This is a strange argument.
So Ted Cruz says everyone knows gun bans don't work. He's a liar .
Prove it. Everywhere they've been enforced, including the US, gun bans have been effective.
That's a local ban. National bans work.
A teacher that left the school door open is responsible for these children’s deaths.
It’s amazing that when the Biden administration starts getting bad press, we have a mass shooting!
I agree it would work, but to what extent and at what trade off?
I don’t prefer an Aussie/ ChiComm style society where jackboots can force me to stay in my home the next time we have a bad flu season.
Are you talking about simply a ban of semi-automatic rifles? That would maybe drop the death toll slightly on these mass shootings, but wouldn’t really do much for overall gun deaths.
Or a ban of all guns? In that the case see Aussie/ ChiComm comment.
You don’t want 2024 Trump coming door to door making MAGA purity checks on an unarmed society any more than I want the Fauci police telling me I must take the MonkeyPox vaccine.
Every autocrat whoever was an autocrat, first went for guns.
Or do you think the tyrannical government angle is played out and not relevant anymore?
Last edited:
Sounds like a solid defense. Too bad for you this POS finally got killed...you could try out that argument in court with the next one.
Biden auditioned the crisis actors.
Also, WWII was staged, because FDR didn’t want to appear weak in his wheelchair.
Similar threads
Latest posts
-
-
Argentina elects "far-right" libertarian--will they turn it around?
- Latest: Joe_Hoopsier
-
-
