You can call me dishonest if you like, but show me any media coverage from 2020 from the MSM, such as ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WAPO, LAT, Chi-Trib, etc that gave any legitimacy to the Hunter Biden story.
so you've now gone from MSM, to certain MSM only.
which just supports what i said when i first responded to you.
the right media exposes left wrongdoing and doesn't so much right wrong doing.
and vice versa with left media.
and all CORPORATE media is against economic progressives, and will do all they can to bury them. (it's not personal, it's just business).
and yes, all media, including Fox and hate radio, should have made a far bigger deal about Hunter prior to the 2020 election.
this wasn't an oversight. all media gives very little coverage to corruption, which our entire govt is now totally based in all day every day, on literally everything economic..
and all Corporate media on both sides are very active participants in said corruption.
that said, i personally made a very big deal about Hunter here, and posted articles here regarding the blatant corruption therein, in the winter and spring of 2020.
but i'm guessing you're only interested in how the lack of coverage affected the general, and not the primary.
should said Biden corruption have effectively disqualified Biden as a candidate?
absolutely.
it obviously gives China significant leverage over Biden.
just as big pharma, the major banks, big oil, big war, own enough of the senate to control it.
Comcast/NBC literally sponsored Biden's candidacy from day 1, again "literally", as Comcast/NBC held a huge fundraiser for Biden at the home of Comcast/NBC's top in house govt lobbyist, attended by Biden, immediately following Biden's press conference announcing his candidacy.
and AT&T/CNN was all in as well, on the Joe bandwagon.
but it never was about defeating Trump for them.
it was about taking down Bernie, who they were/are far more against than Trump.
just as all other corporate media, and all their major corporate advertisers, were kill Bernie at all costs, as well.
again, just business. not personal.
yes, you should absolutely be concerned about how the Hunter story has been handled.
but don't fixate on that, and lose sight of the far far bigger picture here.
CORPORATE media are going to shade coverage of all big races as much as they think they need to, because they all have
BILLION$, to TENS OF BILLION$, to HUNDREDS OF BILLION$, riding on the outcomes of certain elections, as do many of their
CORPORATE advertisers.
which they all conveniently totally omit disclosing that very pertinent fact, in all their coverage of politics.
which pretty much completely disqualifies them from ever classifying themselves as "journalistic", or their talking heads as "journalists".
when doing election coverage, you can't just conveniently leave out that you literally have tens/hundreds of BILLION$ riding on the outcome of said elections, and claim any credibility what so ever as to your coverage. (which at that point is blatant propaganda)
on a side note, fun fact,
Gingrich while speaker of the house, greased the skids for Rupert Murdoch, a foreigner, to enter the US media market, and eliminate or relax media ownership caps, in exchange for Fox establishing a GOP right wing propaganda media empire. (and a $6 mil book deal for Gingrich with a Murdoch owned publisher, as the cherry on top).
of course that wasn't personal either.
just business.
CORPORATIONS ARE CORPORATIONS, AND BEHAVE ONLY AS CORPORATIONS.
and own and have ongoing quid pro quos with both sides.
Bob and Shirley Media Viewer/Reader, just never really grasp that.
