ADVERTISEMENT

3 new scientific studies reach the same conclusion on COVID-19’s origin

I have to give shooter a 7 for trolling on that one. Not his best but a pretty good job. If he is that convinced of this, boy did the govt and msm completely Hannibelize him like Ray Liotta in Silence of the Lambs. Would insert the gif but some here would go whacko.
The movie was actually "Hannibal", not "Silence of the Lambs".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Indianaftw
Go ahead and try to link my former colleague and lead author of the main study in the OP of this thread, Kristian Anderson of the Scripps Research Institute, to pharma funding of this study (there us none), Chinese funding (zip), CDC funding (nope), WHO funding (zippo also). The findings have yet to be refuted or contradicted in any way by other published peer-reviewd scientific studies.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DANC
Go ahead and try to link my former colleague and lead author of the main study in the OP of this thread, Kristian Anderson of the Scripps Research Institute, to pharma funding of this study (there us none), Chinese funding (zip), CDC funding (nope), WHO funding (zippo also). The findings have yet to be refuted or contradicted in any way by other published peer-reviewd scientific studies.
It came from right here in the United States dippo and was sent to Wuhan. Thanks to all that gain of function been going on for years. Please see the Cia thread I started. Youre in a sandbox shooter full of vile people. God damned bat market lmao.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mas-sa-suta
The multi-national team of authors of two studies released Saturday (150 pages, caveat: not yet peer-reviewed) concluded that the coronavirus was very likely present in live mammals sold at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in late 2019 and suggested that the virus spilled over into people working or shopping there on two separate occasions.

A third study was released on Friday from a Chinese group that had swabbed walls, floors and other surfaces inside the market, as well as meat still in freezers and refrigerators, right after authorities had closed the market, though no live animals remained there. They reported that the Huanan market samples included two evolutionary branches of the virus, known as lineages A and B, both of which had been circulating in early COVID cases in China. Earlier evidence had suggested that the market was only linked to lineage B, and therefore couldn’t be responsible for the initial outbreak of lineage A.

The studies together suggest at least two spillover events occurred at the market, at least one for each lineage.
press reports:


two of the papers:


“It’s an extraordinarily clear picture that the pandemic started at the Huanan market,” said Michael Worobey, an evolutionary biologist at the University of Arizona.

“It’s very convincing,” said Dr. Thea Fischer, a public health researcher at the University of Copenhagen, who was not involved in the new studies. The question of whether the virus spilled over from animals “has now been settled with a very high degree of evidence, and thus confidence.”

But others pointed to some gaps that still remained. The new papers did not, for example, identify an animal at the market that spread the virus to humans.

The core info comes from a group of WHO researchers pinning down the location of the first 164 cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan over the course of December 2019. The highest density of December cases centered around the market — a relatively tiny spot in a city of 11 million people. Those cases included not just people who were initially linked to the market, but others who lived in the surrounding neighborhood.

map-who-800.png


The next 737 cases that followed emerged further and further from the market. The researchers ran tests that showed it was extremely unlikely that such a pattern could be produced merely by chance.

map-weibo-800.png

The study on collected tissues points to live animals. The researchers reconstructed the floor plan of the Huanan market based on the WHO report, the leaked Chinese CDC study and other sources. They then mapped the locations of positive environmental samples, finding that they clustered in the area where live animals were sold. Strikingly, five of the samples came from a single stall. That stall had been visited in 2014 by one of the co-authors of the new studies, Edward Holmes, a virus expert at the University of Sydney. On that trip, he had taken a photograph of a cage of raccoon dogs for sale at the time.

Below is the floor map of the market. The lower left area (red) is where live animals had been caged.

market-distribution-900.jpg

Kristian Andersen, a virus expert at the Scripps Research Institute in La Jolla, California, and the senior co-author of one of the new studies, said it was important to figure out where the wild mammals for sale at Huanan came from, and to look for evidence of past outbreaks in those places. It’s possible, for example, that villagers at the sources of that wildlife still carry antibodies from exposures to coronaviruses.

“If I had to say what would be most helpful to do now, it would be those types of studies,” he said.

--------
If you cling to “accidental lab leak” theory then I guess you could argue that it was leaked specifically to lab people who really were avid shoppers in the market, 20 milkes away, and they spread it more to shopping buddies than to coworkers. I have no reason to believe that would make any sense, though.

If you cling to “intentional lab-created bioweapon” theory then I guess you could argue that it was designed to first take out people in the market. That makes even less sense.
Damn! Thanks for posting.

And all this time I was sure it came from Hunter Biden.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT