ADVERTISEMENT

What other fanbases don’t realize

My take on why he wouldn't leave. He's 62 and has the support. If he continues to do what he has, he will go down as a legend (sort of already is) at IU and the greatest coach of all time for the program. If he were to leave in a year or two and go to a more well known program, all he can do in his years left is be just another successful coach in a line of successful coaches. Go to Florida State, Bowden will still be their best. Go to Alabama, still behind Bryant and Saban.

Stay at IU and eventually your lasting legacy is going to be a statue outside the stadium and possibly the field named after you. Welcome to Memorial Stadium and Cignetti Field.

His ability to build a lasting legacy is greater at IU than most other programs and since you already have the ball rolling here why start over. He came to the BIG because he recognized that only the BIG and SEC will be the relevant ones and get the lions share of the money. So tell me, which Big or SEC school could you go to that has the blank slate that IU presents to build your legacy.
Auburn

Four non football observations

1. During game day, they talked about a specific football only weight room and someone stepped up with $1 million to help with that. They couldn't believe other athletes could use it previously. (for all you previous largest weight room in the country chest pounders)
2. Washington players were on the field warming up at 7am their time.
3. The field doesn't look good on tv. Big sun glare. Field needs changed maybe similar to Colts new field.
4. Really need to put a press box and suites end to end and quickly.
They need to do something about the tv slots. I felt that way about Rutgers at USC last night starting at 11PM. Thats playing a game until 2 or 2:30 AM. That’s just dumb. Same for a west coast team with a noon eastern kick. It might be small, but they should accommodate at least a little bit better in either situation.

I’m not looking forward to what season ticket price changes. lol. Almost certainly the free Michigan tix o got as a season ticket holder bonus appear to be headed for the dustbin of history.

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote

Not in the least. Rfk Jr is spot on re censorship concerns and I love his take on the food industry. Musk is an innovator. Let them make Recs. There are safeguards. I’m tired of inertia and with what we’ve witnessed over the last five years with one agency f up after another I’m all for shaking stuff up. Bloat etc. scary is walz Harris spending and inertia
Jesus H. Christ, man. RFK and Musk are lunatics. Let them do what they do, but you shouldn't want them anywhere near the levers of power.

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote

I’ve said it before. My main product we manufacture would cost 6-8x more if we did it in a factory in kc that does it. Brad has the same instincts I do and apparently trump does about our global military influence as well as manufacturing. I know enough to know that trump’s tariffs would indeed raise prices and I know the pain that would come from moving manufacturing back. But I wish I had an idea for how much pain. What it would look like. How long. Etc. And instead of buying navy ships we subsidized favtories for here. Some of the problem overseas is that companies have already had their capital infrastructure invested overseas. So instead of just saying make it here it’s having to build plants again. But what if some of that military budget was carved off for improvements here with restrictions. Restricted funds so it doesn’t go to ceo salaries etc. 85 percent of the products in Walmart are made in China.

What excites me so much about this election isn’t trump. It’s rfk Jr. Tackling censorship. Tackling what we eat. Consumer issues. And musk. Let him loook at these agencies. Let him innovate. Get rid of the bloat

We need a reboot. Gov inertia at a macro level
You're having a go at us, right? RFKJr and Musk are two of the scariest parts of Trump. These guys aren't being put up for Senate confirmation. They won't be subject to IG oversight. They will be unpaid senior advisors with broad portfolios and the ability to make recommendations directly to the President without being vetted by any experts.

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote


Value who knows
Fidelity knows.

Got a phone call yesterday from my guy in the ticket office

$40/game ($30/game for recent grads) is a darn good deal in the world of sporting events.
For the first time in my life, I had the thought today “maybe I should buy season tickets for ‘25!” This occurred to me when I checked SeatGeek and saw tix on sale for $420 apiece right next to the seats I bought 2 weeks ago for $200 apiece!
  • Like
Reactions: red hornet and 76-1

Four non football observations

1. During game day, they talked about a specific football only weight room and someone stepped up with $1 million to help with that. They couldn't believe other athletes could use it previously. (for all you previous largest weight room in the country chest pounders)
2. Washington players were on the field warming up at 7am their time.
3. The field doesn't look good on tv. Big sun glare. Field needs changed maybe similar to Colts new field.
4. Really need to put a press box and suites end to end and quickly.

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote

So this is the same type of sentiment I'm expressing re foreign wars, military spending, etc. I'm worried a lot of times these arguments for our military might keeping markets open is only a ploy for guys like Musk (in other sectors) to profit.

If we apply your justification for that here, I guess we'd have to argue that it's OK for Musk to do what you're accusing him of as long as it also improves in some way our overall standard of living. Is that right?

The reason I think my concern more important or serious, though, is that it involves more than just corruption or crony capitalism--it can lead to us getting involved in military conflicts, piss off regions rife with terrorists, and maybe risk a nuclear war.

And the opposite concern, the Hitler-appeasement?
  • Like
Reactions: BradStevens

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote

You were not here in 2009, CO killed a LOT of photons railing on Tesla and the infrastructure bill. So you think that guy is seriously going to reform government? Or are we putting a heroin addict in charge of our drug policy?

Musk knows how to game agencies for his profit, he ain't giving that up. He is just going to insure he doesn't have competition.
So this is the same type of sentiment I'm expressing re foreign wars, military spending, etc. I'm worried a lot of times these arguments for our military might keeping markets open is only a ploy for guys like Musk (in other sectors) to profit.

If we apply your justification for that here, I guess we'd have to argue that it's OK for Musk to do what you're accusing him of as long as it also improves in some way our overall standard of living. Is that right?

The reason I think my concern more important or serious, though, is that it involves more than just corruption or crony capitalism--it can lead to us getting involved in military conflicts, piss off regions rife with terrorists, and maybe risk a nuclear war.

One conservative’s argument for a Harris vote

I think that guy cut twitter’s staff by 80 percent. I think he has a mind like few others. He’s pulling astronauts out of space. Bringing internet to war torn areas. I think we need to enlist thinkers like that in gov if we want to do anything other than: well I’m with the cdc. We got Xxxxxxx amount allocated last year. We need that plus .5 percent added

Trump said it with WHO. Wait. You bungled Covid too. Why are we just automatically cutting you a check. Biden “and I’m writing a check today to WHO.” Of course. He’s 50 years of gov. Let’s get some people who think differently. If musk is game we’d be fools not to enlist him. You think our gov goose steppers are more innovative? It’s a shame the outsider we got is trump.

Harris and walz. My God it would be impossible to do worse. Perfect gov lifers
No, he cut Twitter's value by 80%. He only cut the staff like 20%.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT