Beard a no go
- By capovito
- Premium IU Hoop Forum
- 354 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
What he did with the talent on that ISU team was remarkable. I couldn’t figure out why he went to St Louis so guessed the money must be much better. I looked at his successful D2 teams and had never heard of them so suspect he never made much money.Shertz is a better hire. Runs a much more modern system. What he did at D2 was incredible. Quickly turned ISU around. Took over a dumpster fire in STL and already has them doing fine.
Describe talent?UCLA has less talent but more effort and better perimeter shooting. He was correct
ESPN Get Up is now a commiemercial for WWE Shill of Fame Inductions.
Complete fabrication is the new norm.
From Aussie Football to fakery by fakes for fakery sake.
If Stevens is out, AD Dolson needs to decide if May or Beard is the better coach. I give the small edge to Beard. However, I could see either doing well.Due diligence starts with getting turned down by Brad Stevens...and fortunately....for the last time. IU doesn't need to kiss the ring any more.....Two things haven't happened since RMK was fired: IU hasn't hired the right coach and Brad Stevens isn't coaching at Indiana. When Stevens said IU was his dream job....he was taken way too seriously. A compliment isn't a marriage proposal. Now hire the best available high level coach who wants the job.
There was one play last night that says it all about MM. Coming down the stretch and IU is desperately trying to get back it and MM rebounds a missed shot just outside the rim for a put back, but he lays the shot back up and it bounces off the rim for a UCLA rebound. He’s 6’9” and was a foot away from the rim, so why not emphatically slam it back to make sure it goes down and also fire up the crowd and team?has had a horrible year, easily a top 3 roster in the big, but overall, just a bunch of mix matched players. you can't have a head coach who basically has no role in evaluating the recruits that are brought into the program. if he kept all the promises he made to the individual players, we would have about 9 guys on the court at all times. Tucker will average 15 at Maryland next year. Reneau will be one of the better Bigs in the SEC. Rice will be a standout point guard somewhere; Carlyse is way better than what Woodson got out of him. MM is what he is, overrated spot up shooter, I don't fault Woodson with him kid just has no motor. last night was the nail in the coffin, win a very winnable game I think we had a very reasonable chance to make the NCAA
No...he's worse.
Respectfully, you should delete this post. I assume you’re better than this.
I've always considered you a reasonable man.The other thing you have to be aware of is the all too frequent move of the media to simply repeat (and occasionally embellish) the same story without doing any in depth research or verification on their own...(which used to be known rather quaintly as "reporting")...
I regularly read multiple news feeds and am aware of the political slant of each one. They all have their own slant and their editors compound that slant...
I watch everything from CNN to MSNBC (for entertainment purposes) to "mainstream legacy feeds (ABC,CBS,NBC) to newer stuff like Newsmax, to even (the horror 😱🙉🙈) Fox...
If it's a big story I routinely hit all of them then head to the internet outlets for their slant (AP, CNN, FOX WaPo, NYTimes, NY Post, WSJ along with whatever pops up on google) I consider myself both well read and well informed... I've left out my military feeds and overseas sources...
All of those sources have their own political slants both left and right (even some of the military ones) as long as that's factored in the mix I figure I've got a decent handle on about 50-75% of the real story...
I've become a bit of a cynic in my old age having read and watched this type of reporting for multiple decades....