Would someone provide a cogent explanation of how IU benefits from playing Marian. The exhibition against Tennessee gave both teams a baseline from which to measure progress. Other than minutes for TG, Tucker and Newton Marian gave IU nothing. MR scoring at will does not prepare him to score in the B1G. Wouldn't IU be far better off scheduling an exhibition against a tough mid-major? A practice with Butler would have far more teaching points than a game against Marian.

Cognitive dissonance game moment: Pat Knight's team playing a 1-3-1 zone

I love our team this year , resilient! Let’s have a great 2nd half !

It was insane , even on the replay he’s there for a first very odd, especially to overturn the call on the field.

Pazhoosier85 said:

I knew by how long it was taking they were going to overturn it. No way they could see that 1 foot short

Click to expand...

Well, you know, the replay officials could see the placement of the ball much better than the guy standing right over the ball.....

DANC said:

Welcome to B1G officiating, Cig. Typical call against us in the state of Michigan.

Click to expand...

They have set us up with the sideline warning.

TheOriginalHappyGoat said:

It's incredible, isn't it? These folks have had their minds twisted so much that they are convinced that the other party is destined to commit political violence, despite the fact that it is actually their party with the recent history of actually doing just that.

Click to expand...

Are you referring to me? Because I’ve been very clear about what I expect. I expect unrest regardless of who wins.

Aloha said there were no riots after the 2016 election. I pointed out he was wrong.

IUNorth said:

Zero possibility they could see that as short. Hmmm…what’s going on here.

Click to expand...

I knew by how long it was taking they were going to overturn it. No way they could see that 1 foot short

dbmhoosier said:

Keep him talking.

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

He's such a bad ass

DANC said:

Welcome to B1G officiating, Cig. Typical call against us in the state of Michigan.

Click to expand...

After last week at UM, maybe the refs are afraid the MSU players will start swinging on them!

These Peacock announcers are terrible. McCoy sounds like an MSU homer

DANC said:

Brad's conservative now? When did this happen?

Click to expand...

It happened when he started disagreeing with some on the left. 🤣

footballcoach82 said:

That replay was a joke! Are you kidding me , we got hosed

Click to expand...

Welcome to B1G officiating, Cig. Typical call against us in the state of Michigan.

Way to go D! Shut down that drive before half even after that bs replay

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

That's at least what, 5 blown calls/no calls now? Refs are obviously homers today...

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

crazed_hoosier2 said:

I've just never been presented an argument against Voter ID that I found terribly persuasive.

Click to expand...

Me either. The only argument I ever hear is that it requires a person to do something. You have to have an ID for many thinngs.

BradStevens said:

I don’t understand why we can’t make this really simple: your vote and ID must be completed on or by Election Day. End of story. If you wanted to vote so badly, then you go get your ID. This isn’t rocket science.

Click to expand...

Bingo....it's not complicated but the voter has some responsibility.

Marvin the Martian said:

Many conservatives seem to be saying they are ok with legal voters being disenfranchised if it means no fraud, liberals will accept some fraud over disenfranchisement.

Click to expand...

I don't believe that at all. I just want to make sure that they are legal and I don't think it is that hard.

That replay was a joke! Are you kidding me , we got hosed

Zero possibility they could see that as short. Hmmm…what’s going on here.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Also, this Oregon offense is insane.

That is such bullishit

Imsowyctcwuzbetta said:

Geez they will be fine... Unbelievable

Click to expand...

“Unbelievable” - am I being a bit impatient? I’ve been waiting about 37 years.

crazed_hoosier2 said:

It’s a very good point - which is why it’s a mistake to use absolute language in talking about elections.

There have always been and will always be occurrences of voter fraud. That does not mean that it’s rampant or that it’s affecting the outcomes of elections. But it’s also wrong to suggest it isn’t something we need reasonable safeguards against. It will always happen, but we can and should do things that make it hard to pull off while not making voting a laborious thing to do.

Click to expand...

To be fair, you're gliding right past a major aspect of the point he's making: tiny examples of honest error can and will happen, but none of them are necessarily fraudulent. They are just mistakes.

Vote totals always change when they do recounts. Why? Not because they caught cheaters. Because there were honest mistakes.