A
anon_mlxxvlbug9dpa
Guest
I’m not equating anything. It became clear a month or two into lockdowns around the world that the disease wasn’t the Bubonic Plague and wasn’t killing at large. At that point the rational thing to do is figure out who is at risk and who isn’t and implement a realistic plan. That didn’t happen.Okay, you’re equating loss of businesses to loss of lives. Prohibitive rules were largely in the first year, before a vaccine was available,. and studies have estimated that another 20 million would’ve died without the vaccine. I live with my 77 year old mother-in-law who has diabetes, COPD, and high BP. I was going to wear a mask and follow the rules to keep her alive. Once we were all vaccinated we eased up. .
Ultimately, I think this was a belief in the test of selflessness and if you were willing to help save a life besides your own. Was risking your business worth saving the lives of the vulnerable in your community?
Without Covid Shots, Another 20 Million Would Have Died: Study - KFF Health News
A fresh study into the impact of vaccines on the global pandemic reveals how many people's lives have been saved, but it also underlines that even more people would be alive if international vaccine efforts had been more successful. Sanofi, GSK and Moderna's vaccines are also in the news.khn.org