Mamdani is a socialist who is in trouble for soft-selling the term "global intifada." Strange times.
Will NYC elect a socialist mayor?
- Thread starter BradStevens
- Start date
Mamdani is a socialist who is in trouble for soft-selling the term "global intifada." Strange times.
Doubtful, but it’s New York and they are batshit crazy. And, it’s Cuomo.
I didn't think I'd see such a consequential election with choices even more horrible than Trump v. Biden in such a short period of time.
Cuomo is being viewed as the rational, reasonable one.
Even though conservatives love to use socialism as some dirty word, I would much rather go that route than see someone with baggage like Cuomo.
But then I don't support shit stains regardless of their party affiliation. Not like there aren't people out there that are without scandals
But then I don't support shit stains regardless of their party affiliation. Not like there aren't people out there that are without scandals
You would rather have socialism. Something that could be devastating, than have another candidate bc of personal baggage?
That’s just unfathomable to me
It's mayor. No matter how important the city, no mayor has the legal authority to implement socialism.
For sure. Theoretically bc I think it’s the same logic we hear with Trump from some. We’re better off suffering in unison than elect a bad person who might do good things
I've been watching Brandon Johnson and before him Lori Lightfoot perform as mayors of a big city. Trust me, they can screw things up badly and make the city worse. Sure, he won't be able to take state ownership of the means of production, but he can implement a lot of other bad, bad policy in policing, education, etc.
Ah yes, the guy calling for a global infitada isn’t a guy with baggage in your eyes
That started long ago with bill clinton not trump. I said when they let clinton get away with sleeping with hundreds of women it would change the game forever. That is why access hollywood never did much because people had seen clinton and nothing was done. Dems will disagree but that is a fact. You cannot have selective outrage you either hold both sides accountable or you do not.
Clinton is getting jerked off in the oval office and sleeping with women and some of his biggest supporters were the NOW game. The national organization of women. I mean so when they come at trump for a recording sorry but I will not play that game. You are total hypocrites
WASHINGTON — Two days after announcing that it might file court papers supporting Paula Corbin Jones in her sexual harassment suit against President Clinton, the National Organization for Women backed off Wednesday, saying that her case is murky and that she has aligned herself with “disreputable right-wing organizations and individuals.
Last edited:
I hope they do. And i hope NYC burns. A good place to try a socialist experiment
You're not a very good socialist.
Come over to the little l libertarian side. You know you want to. We do drugs, let gays be gay and shoot a lot of stuff.
I'm not a socialist or a libertarian.
I'm not big on comprehensive economic (or moral) systems. I think it's all messier than that. So I tend to evaluate a particular economic policy individually, weighing and considering the pros and cons. As a result, I support some ideas that people call socialist and some things that people call libertarian and a bunch in between.
If you think what Clinton did was wrong, but believe what Trump has done is OK, you’re a hypocrite.
Two things.
Monica aged well.
Looking to a politician for morality is like going to Satan to find God.
