There's a level of trust, for sure, that the "other" people are at least somewhat qualified, and they're acting in good faith towards our citizens. I don't agree with a lot of Harris policy, I have serious concerns about similar things you do, but my rational side has to admit that most of those people that would likely be running things behind the scenes, have overall good intentions. They may push a lot of things to their own interests...but all politicians do that. And even if they do push some of the things you mention (for the most part they won't, I'm sure)...but even if they do...as long as they're keeping the house from burning down, we can deal with it. And then in 2028, any sort of decent conservative will easily win, and the pendulum can be swung back towards center for a while.The flaw in your argument is the deception. “There will be people running things while it’s happening.” I didn’t vote for them. Who are they? Are they the people who like defunding police? Climate crazies? Open borders? Do they want bigger gov and cradle to grave benes? Who are these people?
That’s not how it works. You don’t run weekend at bernie’s
What is a non starter, for me...is the thought of a repeat of the Trump no show during Covid...when the wars, and economic situation, all get worse, and more dangerous for us all. To me, its actually worse than a no show, its handcuffing the entire executive branch because of his ego, and the wrecking ball he'll again to the cabinet and major agencies...so when Trump goes Rogue, isn't paying attention to the things that need paying attention to...he won't have anyone at home to make sure the gas is turned off and that the house doesn't burn down.
If you disagree with that, that takes an element of trust on your part that he'll be different this time. To me, that's the same thing as trusting people to make decisions for a further declining Biden.
I think the risk of a Trump 2.0 Presidency is WAY too high.