His excuse is bogus, but a least he's finally admitted his posts are shit.You aren't on here 24x7?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
His excuse is bogus, but a least he's finally admitted his posts are shit.You aren't on here 24x7?
How did they cheat? What laws were broken?
DerpApparently their own since they couldn't confirm during an election year....oh wait we can confirm during an election year. Oopsy, we didn't mean to change our tune
Apparently their own since they couldn't confirm during an election year....oh wait we can confirm during an election year. Oopsy, we didn't mean to change our tune
So you are not going to tell me how they cheated. And you did not post any laws that were broken. Did the Senate change the rules?
They changed the rules as they described them the first time.
If the dems did that bullshit then you would be singing a different too.
Rules? They actually changed the Senate rules? Like the way Reid did?
I must have missed that.
I was a pretty good sweeper back in the day. Don’t knows if soccer teams still have that position. But as a last line of defense, I’m the one you want.you're in the lineup. you play out wide right. cray behind you. we've got coh coaching. mtiof up top. me and hdg play in the middle with courtsense. iucrazy jdb spartans and npt in back with aloha in goal. we don't play a left winger. we'd rather look at open space than a left winger.
we've tried recruiting ranger and twenty but they're holdouts for more dough. stoll comes in at the 60 minute mark with jet
noted. we'll slide you back and move npt upI was a pretty good sweeper back in the day. Don’t knows if soccer teams still have that position. But as a last line of defense, I’m the one you want.
It is the reason they stated that they couldnt confirm garland. The fact that they had no issue confirming one in 2020 shows they were full of shit.
Post more.No rules were changed. No point of order was brought up (like Reid did). The committee simply let the nomination expire, which is within the rules of the Senate.
And yes, if the roles were reversed, I would be pissed. Just like if the roles were reversed, you would be happy and would point to the majority leader invoking the nuclear option on federal appointees, which is exactly what Reid did.
So when cosmic says he gave up on compromise with the "stolen" justices, I say blame Reid.
And as I said, NEITHER party wants to compromise. I know my party does not. But the Dems don't either. I've got beachfront property in Kansas if you believe they will compromise.
So because you assume the other side would do the same, it makes that bull shit alright.No rules were changed. No point of order was brought up (like Reid did). The committee simply let the nomination expire, which is within the rules of the Senate.
And yes, if the roles were reversed, I would be pissed. Just like if the roles were reversed, you would be happy and would point to the majority leader invoking the nuclear option on federal appointees, which is exactly what Reid did.
So when cosmic says he gave up on compromise with the "stolen" justices, I say blame Reid.
And as I said, NEITHER party wants to compromise. I know my party does not. But the Dems don't either. I've got beachfront property in Kansas if you believe they will compromise.
So because you assume the other side would do the same, it makes that bull shit alright.
Yea ok. Nice logic
That was an impressive display by the legislator. Made him look like a kid or he is just a kid.Well it's provided for in a proposed bill. So if the GOP wants to challenge it on Constitutional grounds, then we'll see what the judiciary might say, providing the Dems end up acting unilaterally to pass it.
I'm not sure the Constitution provides for a single judge to be able to overthrow the results of an election on nothing more than one side claiming there was fraud (and offering no actual proof). But that was in the draft version of SB7 the Pubs tried to ram thru in Texas...
Btw speaking of Constitutions. here is a pretty rare example of a video showing the Pub sponsor of the bill being grilled and embarrassed by a very impressive and knowledgeable Dem Legislator. Not only is this particular Pub the epitome of nerdiness, but he seems totally unaware of the racist history behind some of the terminology he chose to include.
I don't know for sure and I'm just speculating. But I'm thinking this incident might have been a huge inspiration for Dems in Texas to have the backbone to walk out and deny the Pubs a quorum... This is a beatdown, Texas-style...
The fact that not one Republican supported this because Schumer insisted on voting for a bill before there was any details is revealing. Democratic Congressional leadership has made it clear that their goal isn't to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill.
And Schumer is a 'no'. LMAO He is the consumate politician.
The fact that not one Republican supported this because Schumer insisted on voting for a bill before there was any details is revealing. Democratic Congressional leadership has made it clear that their goal isn't to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill.
WhutaboutYea, mitch the turtle mcconnell isnt a consummate politician. He is just a swell guy lmao
Yea, mitch the turtle mcconnell isnt a consummate politician. He is just a swell guy lmao
They don’t have to. They seem to be taking charge of the democrat party.the progressives need to bring back the old progressive party and go it as a third party
That's a standard procedural move for the majority leader to keep the bill in his back pocket for later. McConnell did the same thing. And Reid before him. And so on and so forth.And Schumer is a 'no'. LMAO He is the consumate politician.
When did McConnell do it?That's a standard procedural move for the majority leader to keep the bill in his back pocket for later. McConnell did the same thing. And Reid before him. And so on and so forth.
Your non-partisan partisanship is seeping through. Schumer needed to break the deadlock and get the GOP to actually move on the bill. He took a gamble, tried to beat the GOP at their own game, and for once it actually worked.
The fact that not one Republican supported this because Schumer insisted on voting for a bill before there was any details is revealing. Democratic Congressional leadership has made it clear that their goal isn't to pass a bipartisan infrastructure bill.
You just broke the first rule of whutaboutism- knowing the answer to the relevant questions. McConnell was elected to the Senate in 1985, Schumer in 1998. Schumer became Minority leader in 2017, McConnell was in the role of both Minority and Majority Leader as far back as the first decade of this Century...Whutabout
Pointing out double standards doesn't count on this forum, remember?You just broke the first rule of whutaboutism- knowing the answer to the relevant questions. McConnell was elected to the Senate in 1985, Schumer in 1998. Schumer became Minority leader in 2017, McConnell was in the role of both Minority and Majority Leader as far back as the first decade of this Century...
In other words, all of the moves you're attacking Schumer for were first practiced by McConnell. It makes you look really stupid to try and claim otherwise...
their substance is either insane or in bad faith so why would anyone include any members of the squad (progressives) if the objective is to reach a bargain. a collection of race-baiters living in fantasyland are inimical to deal-making
I'm all for Cortez campaigning against the infrastructure deal by accusing Democrat Senators of intentionally excluding minorities from the negotiations.
It's going to be hilarious when The Squad pisses of Sinema and Manchin so much with these dishonest attacks trying to kill the infrastructure bill that Democrats can't get the votes to pass anything substantive with reconciliation.
Also funny that they have become so used to this tactic that they are resorting to playing the race card against other Democrats because they just don't know how to argue substance anymore.
How white of them.
I'm all for Cortez campaigning against the infrastructure deal by accusing Democrat Senators of intentionally excluding minorities from the negotiations.
It's going to be hilarious when The Squad pisses of Sinema and Manchin so much with these dishonest attacks trying to kill the infrastructure bill that Democrats can't get the votes to pass anything substantive with reconciliation.
Also funny that they have become so used to this tactic that they are resorting to playing the race card against other Democrats because they just don't know how to argue substance anymore.