There were far more than those 16 “Noble” laureates.Those were the same Noble Laureates that said Build Back Better would not be inflationary correct?
The guys Biden/ Yellen wheeled out every time they needed a talking point?
They’re doing exactly what they said they were going to do. Bessent has been telegraphing it numerous times in interviews.Don’t throw in with the chicken littles just yet. A market correction doesn’t mean much in the grand scheme of things. Market fundamentals were bad coming in, not much to be done.
Trump does need to get to clarity on tariffs. I’m sure Bessent and Lutnick are in his ear telling him the same thing. Stop playing with them like a kid who found where their parents keep their gun.
Needs to unpause aid and intelligence to Ukraine if Rubio can’t get movement this week. Then we can push away from the table saying “we’ve passed our last funding bill, once this aid runs dry that’s it from us, we’ll provide intel support where we can”
But it shocks me that after Trump’s first term there are still people unwilling to give him the benefit of the doubt on foreign policy and the economy.
I think Social Security is going to be screwed over. The default, if no one acts, is roughly a 21% cut in 2033 or so. My plans account for that as no one has the political will to actually address the issue.Musk has characterized Social Security as “the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.” Wait ‘til he and the co-president start fvcking with that.
Man you’ll believe anything huh sport? We had to listen to moron after moron breathlessly explain how inflation was transitory last administration.There were far more than those 16 “Noble” laureates.
What those 16 said, though, I believe was that that program would ease “longer-term inflationary pressures.”
Inflation, after quickly spiking, in fact dropped precipitously and was approaching the Fed’s 2% target a few months ago. That number will be little more than a fantasy a year from now.
Why do they all have to be transformative. Slow and steady. Pick a couple issues to improve. That’s it. Is that we elect people who spend 50 years in a bubble and are just clueless. Are billionaires and have lost all sense of normalcy. We truly would be better off with Sortition and no elections
This is not true. Inflation has been on the rise the last several months. Also, I’ll take the other side. Inflation will come down if we go into a recession.Inflation, after quickly spiking, in fact dropped precipitously and was approaching the Fed’s 2% target a few months ago. That number will be little more than a fantasy a year from now.
There were some really ill advised rate cuts in late 2024 when yoy inflation numbers didn’t warrant them.This is not true. Inflation has been on the rise the last several months. Also, I’ll take the other side. Inflation will come down if we go into a recession.
That is a big part of it. Never underestimate the average foreign countries ability to endure pain better than us. In the case of China especially. We are spoiled and entitled.That's how I feel about Tariffs, we don't like what China is doing, fight our tariff war against China. But no, we declare war on the entire world. We're like the German Kaiser, we are the biggest and baddest and can fight the rest of the world all at the same time.
But we probably can't do it all at once, and if we can we won't like the pain.
How hard is it to significantly raise the Social Security tax limit, from $176,100 (now) to (say) $400,000? Or no upper limit? Nobody earning less than $176K would pay a penny more. Right now, a billionaire pays the same amount into Social Security as someone who makes $176,100 a year.I think Social Security is going to be screwed over. The default, if no one acts, is roughly a 21% cut in 2033 or so. My plans account for that as no one has the political will to actually address the issue.
I think Trump is looking for a recession in order to cut rates. At heart he is and always will be a real estate investor.This is not true. Inflation has been on the rise the last several months. Also, I’ll take the other side. Inflation will come down if we go into a recession.
Removing the cap would hit me, but I really don't mind if it extends the life. Plus my company foots half the bill. 😄How hard is it to significantly raise the Social Security tax limit, from $176,100 (now) to (say) $400,000? Or no upper limit? Nobody earning less than $176K would pay a penny more. Right now, a billionaire pays the same amount into Social Security as someone who makes $176,100 a year.
Sure, people above $176K would be paying more and you'd have to promise them less of a payout, percentage wise, but such a minor adjustment as this would increase solvency for generations.
Removing the cap was something Bernie proposed on 2021. It was also couple to expanding SS payouts (even named the Social Security Expansion Act), though, so it had no chance.
It’s not a minor adjustment. Some of us make relatively little over 176K and it ****s our quality of life.How hard is it to significantly raise the Social Security tax limit, from $176,100 (now) to (say) $400,000? Or no upper limit? Nobody earning less than $176K would pay a penny more. Right now, a billionaire pays the same amount into Social Security as someone who makes $176,100 a year.
Sure, people above $176K would be paying more and you'd have to promise them less of a payout, percentage wise, but such a minor adjustment as this would increase solvency for generations.
Removing the cap was something Bernie proposed in 2021. It was also coupled to expanding SS payouts (even named the Social Security Expansion Act), though, so it had no chance. He's pushing it again. It would be wiser to first focus on dollar influx, though, IMO.
Do you know any business owners that have foreign imports as a major part of their business chain? If you do, many of them are flipping on Trump...some publicly, many privately.
There is not doubt you want a recession in fact I think you are cheering for one. Anything to make trump look bad is your motto.
There's no free lunch. Unless you want to roll back benefits, somebody's going to pay more. I'd rather it not be those with incomes unlikely to have allowed them to build their own hefty 401K safety net.It’s not a minor adjustment. Some of us make relatively little over 176K and it ****s our quality of life.
You’re talking to someone who doesn’t believe SS should exist so keep that in mind. So yes, I select roll back benefits. Even better, make SS an optional, market based program.There's no free lunch. Unless you want to roll back benefits, somebody's going to pay more.
You could also increase the age limit to affect the other side of the ledger. It has already gone from 65 to 67, depending on your DOB. Life expectancy is so much longer today.
I'd prefer to focus on the money coming in. Sure, cut fraud and waste, but I know of no evidence that abuse is a major problem with SS outlays.
The GDPNow model estimate for real GDP growth (seasonally adjusted annual rate) in the first quarter of 2025 is -2.4 percent on March 6, up from -2.8 percent on March 3. After recent releases from the Institute for Supply Management, the US Bureau of Economic Analysis, and the US Census Bureau, the nowcasts of first-quarter real personal consumption expenditures growth and real gross private domestic investment growth increased from 0.0 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively, to 0.4 percent and 4.8 percent, while the nowcast of the contribution of net exports to first-quarter real GDP growth fell from -3.57 percentage points to -3.84 percentage points
Are they though? He's been clear from the get-go about his pro-tariff agenda. Plenty won't like the result, but that's on them, isn't it?
That thing jumps around like crazy. I don't put too much stock in it, but fun to get the mood of the week.
Settle down. Have a drink or three. There will never be a reduction in SS benefits. The cap will be raised and other tweaks will be out there. But “they” know there would be a “gray revolution” if “they” tried to reduce the monthly benefit. Will never happen.I think Social Security is going to be screwed over. The default, if no one acts, is roughly a 21% cut in 2033 or so. My plans account for that as no one has the political will to actually address the issue.
Never say never as the population continues to age. Reduction in benefits can take many forms.Settle down. Have a drink or three. There will never be a reduction in SS benefits. The cap will be raised and other tweaks will be out there. But “they” know there would be a “gray revolution” if “they” tried to reduce the monthly benefit. Will never happen.