sounds like the lawyers gave Vindman good advice. We know that nothing happened that vindman was concerned about. Vindmann blew everything up.
trump is cleaning out of all the traitors
- Thread starter Cream&Crimson
- Start date
sounds like the lawyers gave Vindman good advice. We know that nothing happened that vindman was concerned about. Vindmann blew everything up.
How does that “seem clear”? What evidence are you using to determine that other than your desperate need to confirm your own biases?
I think Schiff was involved and relied on it to write his “parody”. I don’t think any of them thought Trump would make the transcript public.
Also based on somebody’s reporting, some people think Vindman, who was on the call, was the whistleblowers source, who was not on the call.
What's it feel like to be brainwashed?
Do you have a link to the actual transcript of the call? I’d love to read the transcript.
He also has a history of being reprimanded for inappropriate political behavior. He should never have been in the NSA. He did not get fired, he got transferred. Big difference.
https://www.statedepartmentwatch.or...ppropriate-and-partisan-behavior-in-military/
not one bit of that is evidence. I asked you to provide evidence for your claim and you mumble conspiracy theories instead.
COH displays the intellectual rigor of VPM. He just uses fancier words and phrasing.
Schiff’s parody is not my conspiracy theory. It was a deliberate attempt to spread his own conspiracy theory which he advanced as chairman of the house judiciary committee. He wasn’t a lone wolf.
Schiff will not admit his state of mind. He buried the whistleblower immediately after Trump released the transcript. Schiff released all the super secret testimony except for one witness, the IG who could shed light light on the background for his “parody”. Schiff’s conduct before the senate as a manager was awful. He has a screw loose and you got sucked in.
[
What did Vindman do wrong? He went to the Counsel exactly as he should. Are you suggesting he should not have testified?
What is the derangement syndrome called for for those that freak out at anyone criticizing Trump beyond "maybe Trump should tweet a little better"?
Sure. By bury the whistleblower you mean follow whistleblower protection laws and by release the transcript you mean release an edited incomplete summary. But keep attacking Schiff and spreading lies, it’s what you have left.
Did he? Breitbart and other far right media have claimed that. Vindman denied it. The WH statement on the firing did bot mention leaking confidential information.
Vindman admits to “reporting” about the call. He refuses to say who he reported it to.
he also said he reported to “a member of the intelligence community”.
Vindman testified that he did not have time to express his concerns directly to Morrison, but he apparently found the time to express his concerns to both Deputy Assistant Secretary of State George Kent and an unnamed individual in the intelligence community.
And? Those 3, for all I know, had access to the call. If so, how is sharing a concern bad. You need to read some military history, junior officers discussing concerns from senior officers is pretty standard.
There is no transcript. You know this, and yet you keep saying it like it's true. What you keep trying to tell everyone is a transcript is actually just a White House concocted summary. The fact that you keep saying transcript is more evidence that you don't give two shits about truth. You're a gaslighting asshole.
unless Schiff and the whistleblower made up the whole deal, someone who was on the call took it outside the White House. Vindman admitted to doing that.
The Ukrainians never voiced an objection to the contents. I don’t think Vindman did either. His opinion was based on other comments. The summary was done by those who are supposed to do that. It’s pretty accurate.
Vindman admitted to leaking to people outside the NSC? Can you provide his quote?
Defending an unstable, corrupt, unfit and morally bankrupt individual must be exhausting. Doing it for nothing in return is stupid.
You said:
... someone who was on the call took it outside the White House. Vindman admitted to doing that.
Completely unresponsive. It is NOT a transcript. It is clear that there are gaps in the conversation. You continue to gaslight. You are a liar.
I think I know the answer to this, but was the call a “perfect call”?
Or, as even the pub senators admitted, was it really bad action?
who gives a rat’s ass as to who the whistleblower was. What he related was extremely accurate.
remember, the White House released a sanitized summary of the call- it was likely worse than reported.
The problem is that Trump actually believes that his behavior was 100% appropriate. As do you, apparently.
I’m amazed at what you’ve become on here CO.
I don’t think Trump’s intentions were wise and I agree the criticism is at least reasonable. But nothing happened. Impeachment was a bad joke. Schiff was a worse joke.
You said Vindman admitted telling someone outside the WH? Where is the attribution to that?
You have to use COH's exact wording when you refer to his statements. Otherwise, he will suck you into the "not what I said" abyss. He's been yanking your chain in that fashion all afternoon now.
Hey, you going to respond to being a liar? Because that's what I'm calling you. You know there is no transcript, and refuse to confront that. You continue gaslight.
You believe that lying liars in the White House, who have everything to gain by lying, are pretty accurate but you disbelieve an honest guy who has no reason whatsoever to lie.
Similar threads
