ADVERTISEMENT

Top 5 Candidates to replace CAM.

Dennis Franchione was who I was referring to. Alabama actually fired 3 coaches, in the previous 10 years, before hiring Saban.
Gotcha.

My point is who has fired a coach at a blueblood after only 2-3 years and hired a big time coach? Very few situations like that exist. Most coaches are going to get enough time to prove/disprove themselves.
 
You post dozens of times every day. I’m not sorting through thousands of your posts to find what we all remember.

Translation: I can't provide what I claim.

goat-to-step-up-goat-memes.jpg
 
Gotcha.

My point is who has fired a coach at a blueblood after only 2-3 years and hired a big time coach? Very few situations like that exist. Most coaches are going to get enough time to prove/disprove themselves.

Indiana isn’t s blueblood...when was the last time IU was relevant? I’m 33, from Ohio, and don’t remember IU ever being a dominate team
 
Indiana isn’t s blueblood...when was the last time IU was relevant? I’m 33, from Ohio, and don’t remember IU ever being a dominate team
We have the blueblood heritage. But we're in danger of losing it forever if we don't get it back soon.

To do that, you have to build the program. And cutting a guy loose after 2 years isn't the way to achieve that.
 
But continuing the status quo is?
Am I enjoying these losses? Hell no!

But I (unlike you) understand there isn’t a lot of easy answers, either. There are so many factors going into this season gone wrong.

I see a disconnected team. Is that on Archie? If something is clarified that HE caused the obvious bad chemistry, I’ll rip him. Until then, I’ll believe it comes from elsewhere.
 
Since football was brought into the equation, Charlie Strong was canned after 3 losing season. Herman has had them 2 years and is racking up top 5 recruiting classes and won the Sugar Bowl. Not sure this has anything to do with Archie.
 

Only one of those was after I was born and I wasn’t even two years old. I’ll stand by my comment. A blueblood doesn’t win championships and then fall. Is Villanova now a blueblood?

Just to dig deeper this is the first article I came upon to backup what I thought a blueblood program is and they specifically mention IU as “tier 2” https://www.nunesmagician.com/2018/...cuse-orange-tradition-success-ncaa-tournament
 
Last edited:
Only one of those was after I was born and I wasn’t even two years old. I’ll stand by my comment. A blueblood doesn’t win championships and then fall. Is Villanova now a blueblood?

Just to dig deeper this is the first article I came upon to backup what I thought a blueblood program is and they specifically mention IU as “tier 2” https://www.nunesmagician.com/2018/...cuse-orange-tradition-success-ncaa-tournament
I didn't say anything about whether IU is a blueblood or not. You asked when Indiana was dominant and I showed you. The fact that most of it happened before you were born is both sad and, ultimately, beside the point.
 
Last edited:
Why are Wright, Bennett and Donovan on your list here? None of them were any good their 2nd year either. People and their lists
IU has the benefit of loading up top tier classes and at a quicker pace. Get the right guy in here and it doesn't or shouldn't take more than 2 or 3 years tops. What's so hard to figure out?
 
  • Like
Reactions: snarlcakes
Who are the really great coaches out there anymore, let alone ones that would come here. I don't think there are nearly as many as there used to be . The obvious ones of course . Look how long it took Alabama football after Bear, and they did have a brief run with Stallings before Saban. We had for 22 of his 29 years , just basketball throw the side things out , Likely the best coach ever. It isn't going to happen again. Knight had a great base to recruit players for his coaching . He adapted more than people think. In 76 he had the best team and made it great, in 81 he had the best player and finally let Zeke play and won . In 87 he built a team around a kid that could shoot. Its not too far out that he could have won 3-4 more , 73, 75, 83, 93 besides a horrid call and injuries . Hard telling 82 with Landon's injury. We aren't finding a coach like that again it was lightning in a bottle. I do wonder what is behind the scenes and how much Archie is able to get on them. It is a different time . Look at the NBA talent on the other '' blue bloods'' , look at Indiana , Isiah, Henderson is probably next but besides Zeke really hard to say Woodson did OK. Not going to win that way anymore. I really almost after watching this yr like Painter coaching to win the conference . I hate Purdue but who is doing more with less?
 
IU has the benefit of loading up top tier classes and at a quicker pace. Get the right guy in here and it doesn't or shouldn't take more than 2 or 3 years tops. What's so hard to figure out?
Thank god you don’t make these decisions.
 
We have the blueblood heritage. But we're in danger of losing it forever if we don't get it back soon.

To do that, you have to build the program. And cutting a guy loose after 2 years isn't the way to achieve that.

Personally, I think it probably already is lost....in the sense that I’ve lost hope that we’ll ever again be what we were. Not in my lifetime, anyway.

I still support the program 100% —in good times and bad. So it’s not as if I’m a fair-weather fan. Just realistic and weary of feeling let down by unfulfilled expectations. Stock market watchers call it capitulation.

I do agree that we shouldn’t fire a coach after just 2 seasons. But let’s also not forget that the last one got 9 seasons — despite results that were uneven and underachieving even during the couple of highest water seasons.

So, yeah, there are dangers in cutting bait too soon. There are also dangers in waiting too long — because that sends a message that underperformance is acceptable.

Personally, I think that Archie should be informed that the results to date are nothing short of unacceptable and that he has one more season to correct that. If he has another lackluster year and gets more time, I think we’ll be in the territory of essentially saying that subpar results are, while not desired, also not cause for termination.
 
Who are the really great coaches out there anymore, let alone ones that would come here. I don't think there are nearly as many as there used to be . The obvious ones of course . Look how long it took Alabama football after Bear, and they did have a brief run with Stallings before Saban. We had for 22 of his 29 years , just basketball throw the side things out , Likely the best coach ever. It isn't going to happen again. Knight had a great base to recruit players for his coaching . He adapted more than people think. In 76 he had the best team and made it great, in 81 he had the best player and finally let Zeke play and won . In 87 he built a team around a kid that could shoot. Its not too far out that he could have won 3-4 more , 73, 75, 83, 93 besides a horrid call and injuries . Hard telling 82 with Landon's injury. We aren't finding a coach like that again it was lightning in a bottle. I do wonder what is behind the scenes and how much Archie is able to get on them. It is a different time . Look at the NBA talent on the other '' blue bloods'' , look at Indiana , Isiah, Henderson is probably next but besides Zeke really hard to say Woodson did OK. Not going to win that way anymore. I really almost after watching this yr like Painter coaching to win the conference . I hate Purdue but who is doing more with less?

Alabama had 6 coaches between Bryant and Saban. Stallings had the longest tenure of any of them (7 years). And he was pretty successful — a number of SEC championships. But he also had a vacated season.

Of the other ones, 3 coaches got 4 seasons. Two got 3 seasons. And Franchione left after 2 seasons.
 
Personally, I think it probably already is lost....in the sense that I’ve lost hope that we’ll ever again be what we were. Not in my lifetime, anyway.

I still support the program 100% —in good times and bad. So it’s not as if I’m a fair-weather fan. Just realistic and weary of feeling let down by unfulfilled expectations. Stock market watchers call it capitulation.

I do agree that we shouldn’t fire a coach after just 2 seasons. But let’s also not forget that the last one got 9 seasons — despite results that were uneven and underachieving even during the couple of highest water seasons.

So, yeah, there are dangers in cutting bait too soon. There are also dangers in waiting too long — because that sends a message that underperformance is acceptable.

Personally, I think that Archie should be informed that the results to date are nothing short of unacceptable and that he has one more season to correct that. If he has another lackluster year and gets more time, I think we’ll be in the territory of essentially saying that subpar results are, while not desired, also not cause for termination.

Great post....sums up my feelings exactly.
 
Am I enjoying these losses? Hell no!

But I (unlike you) understand there isn’t a lot of easy answers, either. There are so many factors going into this season gone wrong.

I see a disconnected team. Is that on Archie? If something is clarified that HE caused the obvious bad chemistry, I’ll rip him. Until then, I’ll believe it comes from elsewhere.
You mean you’ll keep your head in the sand until someone forcibly pulls it out? Got it
 
I wanted Tony Bennett when he coached at Washington State, but firmly believe that just ain't gonna happen.
I was happy with the Archie hire, and will give him the chance to establish his culture here.
 
Then why did he suck so much until his 4th year?
Please tell me you're not arguing that Archie is as good a coach as Bennett at this point. There is literally nothing to back that claim up and a lot more evidence to the contrary.

Archie will certainly get for years to prove his worth, but you can't argue at this point that it's been anything but a disappointment.
 
At this point I almost feel like let's just go with Alford and be done with it. Archie was supposed to be the best up and coming coach but so far that's proven to be laughable. It's like that Seinfeld where George does the opposite of what he thinks and everything starts working out."If every instinct you have is wrong, then the opposite, would have to be right." Alford 2020
 
Please tell me you're not arguing that Archie is as good a coach as Bennett at this point. There is literally nothing to back that claim up and a lot more evidence to the contrary.

Archie will certainly get for years to prove his worth, but you can't argue at this point that it's been anything but a disappointment.


At this point?

At this point (2nd year in current jobs)....

Bennett (Record / Kpom rating)

Y1: 15-16 (76th)
Y2: 16-15 (103rd)

Archie

Y1: 16-15 (71st)
Y2: 13-11 (45th)


So Archie is tracking better?
 
A new name! What about me fab 5 Steve Fisher? He would be a good get, or how about Kermit Davis? Dude can coach
 
At this point?

At this point (2nd year in current jobs)....

Bennett (Record / Kpom rating)

Y1: 15-16 (76th)
Y2: 16-15 (103rd)

Archie

Y1: 16-15 (71st)
Y2: 13-11 (45th)


So Archie is tracking better?
You’re just finding an example that fits your narrative. How about coaches that did well their first 2 years.....
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT