What makes you think the Israelis want to take out Putin?Well, one nuke and one nut. BOOM.
Damn, I wish we or the Israelis could take out Putin.
What makes you think the Israelis want to take out Putin?Well, one nuke and one nut. BOOM.
Damn, I wish we or the Israelis could take out Putin.
If I did or didn't is irrelevant. This posting is unbelievable on it's face, and then we we do dig into it, you have totally misrepresented the info. It's not about today, it's about a maybe, potentially, possibly in the future. You know damn well that this is not how the "Special Ukraine defends themselves operation" is going. Totally quite the opposite in fact (Although even the orcx aren't loosing 3,500 people a day. (8-11% of that actually). .Joe, did you read or listen, even for ten minutes, to ANY of the 'sources' I posted for you?
The vision of you sobbing into your pillow is believable.Why would he? At this point it's clear all your sources are bogus. Sorry, Mas. I'm feeling sorry for you being so misinformed and gullible.
I don’t know. What makes you think they don’t? I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure the Russians aren’t their favorite people.What makes you think the Israelis want to take out Putin?
Your conclusions are faulty.
And the 800 pounder is a gorilla.
That’s very dumb. You’re posting nonsense and you’ve been called out for it. You should stop. You don’t need to make yourself look more foolish - you’ve pegged the meter.The vision of you sobbing into your pillow is believable.
Listen sir. I honestly thought that you were a blood born American, but the pro Russia stuff you bring is totally impossible just on the raw data. You hate America MIC, I'm there with you all day because they own our politicians.Please cease posting, as the Company man now speaks for you, apparently..
So you don't bother to spend ten minutes looking at multiple source materials, but you know the answers to ALL the questions.If I did or didn't is irrelevant. This posting is unbelievable on it's face, and then we we do dig into it, you have totally misrepresented the info. It's not about today, it's about a maybe, potentially, possibly in the future. You know damn well that this is not how the "Special Ukraine defends themselves operation" is going. Totally quite the opposite in fact (Although even the orcx aren't loosing 3,500 people a day. (8-11% of that actually). .
Is there any chance that you are a drinking man? I get a sense of two totally separate personalities.Your conclusions are faulty.
And the 800 pounder is a gorilla.
You know that question is silly. I feel that I am actually on your side, but this stuff you've been bringing is really, simply impossible, as real time, today intel.So you don't bother to spend ten minutes looking at multiple source materials, but you know the answers to ALL the questions.
Balvenie Single CaskIs there any chance that you are a drinking man? I get a sense of two totally separate personalities.
I only ask this because most of my best work here is inspired via a russian distillary of potatos.
Friendy..You know that question is silly. I feel that I am actually on your side, but this stuff you've been bringing is really, simply impossible, as real time, today intel.
I feel you are converging future simulated assumptions, to todays real intel. Or I am jut totally missing on everything. ???
One little side step in the convo.What is faulty, has Russian conquered a nation 1/6th its size in 18 months? Was Russia doing so badly that one of their commanders began a coup, and was murdered for it.
See, you had me until the IPA. That is why you are a bitter man assuming false data. IPA isn't even good to kill gNats.Balvenie Single Cask
1 ice cube.
Jameson
Neat. For sipping
Pat Klooz 1832 IPA
I know Joe. He doesn't let anyone speak for him and he's the furthest thing from a company man you can imagine.Please cease posting, as the Company man now speaks for you, apparently..
It was a joke.You're the worst. Different views...get rid of him. At least you are consistent, softy.
Even without doing any research, the wording (let alone the #'s) made clear there was Mas confusion on the report. If not pure lies, in real time issues.
German tank crews being reported....... German Tank (leopards)......... crews. well no shit.
UK fleet sailing the black sea.... really? C'mon.
I had a feeling that it was some report/ guestimation on some future assumed conflict and has zero resemblance to todays activities.
Please cease posting, as the Company man now speaks for you, apparently..
I know Joe. He doesn't let anyone speak for him and he's the furthest thing from a company man you can imagine.
What a victim.It was a joke.
Where were you when I was told I was worse than a cancer, that I should bleed and slowly die?
You're lost.So you don't bother to spend ten minutes looking at multiple source materials, but you know the answers to ALL the questions.
You are a good 'progressive' after all.
Not at all, Dank.
Is that bloom after a burnt Souffle? in his safe shower? with a moist cloth? I thought so.
You won’t link it because your link is an embarrassment deserving ridicule. You do this all the time. If you’re not sure of your sources, and you definitely shouldn’t be, stop posting crap you get from them.
The only way the Russians would "win" is by making sure everyone loses. If their nuclear arsenal was still in repair that would be a danger to NATO. Their conventional forces would get rolled. They can't deal with a mostly earthbound foe at the moment, an enemy able to bring combined arms onto the battlefield would run them off that field.They are suggesting this kind of loss in a massive theater war. Not in Ukraine which we are not in. But Russia is also woefully short of troops, and US aircraft will do far better against Russia than the MiGs did. In other words, how on earth could Russia sustain their losses on an attack against the EU?
Army War College Press
https://press.armywarcollege.edu › ...PDF
A Call to Action: Lessons from Ukraine for the Future Force - USAWC Press
I truly empathize with the Russians as on more than one occasion that’s been my only move. And I hit the button. Lasting damage. Years and years. So without being a military strategist, save shepherding the small but rugged militia I’ve built here, someone needs to build an exit ramp for Russia that saves just enough face to eventually exit all of this messThe only way the Russians would "win" is by making sure everyone loses. If their nuclear arsenal was still in repair that would be a danger to NATO. Their conventional forces would get rolled. They can't deal with a mostly earthbound foe at the moment, an enemy able to bring combined arms onto the battlefield would run them off that field.
That's why we don't want NATO facing off against the Russians over this. Their only move is to go nuclear.
I have spent more than 5 seconds thinking about it and I think it is either they go nuclear or they accept total defeat. NATO has pushed through most of the tough terrain by adding countries since the Soviets fell. A whole bunch of the ground between where NATO ends and where Russia begins is open plains. They've burned through their modern equipment and the past 30 years has been a display of what the US/NATO can do on open ground.I truly empathize with the Russians as on more than one occasion that’s been my only move. And I hit the button. Lasting damage. Years and years. So without being a military strategist, save shepherding the small but rugged militia I’ve built here, someone needs to build an exit ramp for Russia that saves just enough face to eventually exit all of this mess
Len is really a modern miracle.What happened to the 750,000-man Russian winter offensive last winter? Nothing you post about Ukraine (the country that was invaded by RUSSIA) is credible.
VERY cool story, bruv!I have spent more than 5 seconds thinking about it and I think it is either they go nuclear or they accept total defeat. NATO has pushed through most of the tough terrain by adding countries since the Soviets fell. A whole bunch of the ground between where NATO ends and where Russia begins is open plains. They've burned through their modern equipment and the past 30 years has been a display of what the US/NATO can do on open ground.
The Ukrainians have to send people to clear out those Russian trenches. The NATO powers would just blow a hole in them and drive through. And once you have breached it becomes a race for Moscow. Look how quickly Prighozin was able to move when he turned his forces to Moscow. The Russians aren't equipped to slow an advance like that.
So if you are sitting in Moscow, your front lines are breached, and you have visions of getting Saddamed or Quadaffid in your head, what is your call? I think the rational response is to deploy a tactical size nuke to some Ukrainian city to try and force NATO to the negotiating table. A little less rational is to go out with a bang. What isn't an option is thinking you can bleed them out. Not conventionally. I suppose you could disband the government, cross the Urals and try and go insurgent but I don't see these billionaires in Russia being interested in that life.
His. 😉Len is really a modern miracle.
Who else could bring @TheOriginalHappyGoat , @Aloha Hoosier , @Marvin the Martian , @twenty02 , @DANC , @Bloom. , @Joe_Hoopsier , @UncleMark , @IUCrazy2 , @BCCHoosier , @larsIU , @Univee2 , @Standard Issue , @82hoosier , and @Harry Hondo together in agreement with their stupidity?
Is the greatest irony that he's quoting someone who goes by the moniker Simplicius the Thinker?
A toast to Len...for bringing all of us together in common cause to point at your posts and shake our collective heads.
![]()
You don't know anything about what I read, or whereHe didn’t read that. He read misinformation about it on one of the ridiculously dumb sites he visits.
I read it, Mas. Are you lying about reading it, or are you lying about what it says? You have to be lying about one of them.You don't know anything about what I read, or where
The War College link was posted by Marvin.
Get someone to read it to you.
Then you are NOT funny, softy.It was a joke.
Where were you when I was told I was worse than a cancer, that I should bleed and slowly die?
You’re such a compassionate liberal.How many different Russian propaganda threads do you need to start?
Don't worry...it wasn't a woke thing...it was a correct English thing.His. 😉
I've proposed this before, but an exit ramp could be to remove all Russian troops from Crimea and all other occupied Ukrainian territories and a guarantee from NATO that those areas would be demilitarized (assuming Ukraine would be admitted into NATO - which they'd go for in a hot second).I have spent more than 5 seconds thinking about it and I think it is either they go nuclear or they accept total defeat. NATO has pushed through most of the tough terrain by adding countries since the Soviets fell. A whole bunch of the ground between where NATO ends and where Russia begins is open plains. They've burned through their modern equipment and the past 30 years has been a display of what the US/NATO can do on open ground.
The Ukrainians have to send people to clear out those Russian trenches. The NATO powers would just blow a hole in them and drive through. And once you have breached it becomes a race for Moscow. Look how quickly Prighozin was able to move when he turned his forces to Moscow. The Russians aren't equipped to slow an advance like that.
So if you are sitting in Moscow, your front lines are breached, and you have visions of getting Saddamed or Quadaffid in your head, what is your call? I think the rational response is to deploy a tactical size nuke to some Ukrainian city to try and force NATO to the negotiating table. A little less rational is to go out with a bang. What isn't an option is thinking you can bleed them out. Not conventionally. I suppose you could disband the government, cross the Urals and try and go insurgent but I don't see these billionaires in Russia being interested in that life.
You misunderstood, I think the only off ramp if/when NATO forces are involved is most likely nuclear. There are a whole host of options if NATO boots aren't on the ground actively fighting Russians.I've proposed this before, but an exit ramp could be to remove all Russian troops from Crimea and all other occupied Ukrainian territories and a guarantee from NATO that those areas would be demilitarized (assuming Ukraine would be admitted into NATO - which they'd go for in a hot second).
Make some guarantees that the Russian supporters in those areas will not be tried as collaborators. Put UN forces in there to keep the peace.
We'd have to guarantee we wouldn't put Putin on trial for war crimes. He could then retire to his dacha with his private security force, which he can well afford, if he wants. If not, let his own people deal with him. Hell, give him a place in Switzerland.
There are plenty of options to create an end to this without a nuclear strike.
I know you read misinformation. Worse, you believe it.You don't know anything about what I read, or where
The War College link was posted by Marvin.
Get someone to read it to you.
Mixing singular and plural causes confusion. Spare me the “they, them and their can be singular” stuff. I’ve heard it and know that’s not what was taught in high school, college or grad school. Certainly not taught in any of my military training where orders and instructions must be precise. Imagine the order to kill Bin Laden said, “you may find him, Osama Bin Laden, with family including children, kill them.”Don't worry...it wasn't a woke thing...it was a correct English thing.![]()
I agree.You misunderstood, I think the only off ramp if/when NATO forces are involved is most likely nuclear. There are a whole host of options if NATO boots aren't on the ground actively fighting Russians.