ADVERTISEMENT

These are not political prisoners

Donald Trump is not a victim of misinformation. Let's start there. The underlying October surprise was that there was evidence of a quid pro quo by the Biden's. Correct? That was the claim.

I’m not aware of any allegation arising from the contents of the laptop that Joe Biden did X in exchange for Y.

What quid pro quo are you referring to?
 
The timing matters because the Trump October surprise was an attempt to disinform/lie about the contents of the laptop.

So you’ve said a couple times.

Can you be specific about what lie Trump or his campaign was attempting to tell about the contents of the laptop? If you can provide a link, even better.
 
She was unarmed
Let's say an angry mob shows up at your house chanting about how they want to kill your wife.

You yell "I have a gun, go away or I'll shoot!"

The break down your door. You barricade yourself and your wife in your bedroom.

You yell "I have a gun, go away or I'll shoot!"

The kick holes in the door and yell "there she is, kill her!"

You yell "I have a gun, go away or I'll shoot!"

The bust down the rest of the door.

You yell "I have a gun, go away or I'll shoot!"

They don't go away. They charge. You shoot.

Tragedy, or no?
 
It is never cool to storm the capital.
I said yesterday that Biden is a POS for some of his pardons/commutations, including the commutation for a scumbag who killed two FBI agents 50 years ago. But these MAGA guys here simply cannot or will not call their guy/god out for anything. He does no wrong in their eyes except “mean tweets.” It’s the most fvcked up thing I’ve ever seen in American politics.

Here’s an article quoting the legendary and one-of-a-kind conservative sheriff of Polk County FL regarding Trumps J6 pardons and commutations. Kudos to Grady Judd for speaking the truth.

 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
FTR, I did start watching it and they referred to an email from Burisma and the notorious email about “10 held by H for the Big Guy”.

But those aren’t lies, they’re just emails.

So can we just cut to the chase so I can respond to the disinformation you’re referring to?
You said a link was even better. Watch it and tell me whether it was disinformation or not.

He offered the emails as proof. He said that it was full of child porn(SHAME) and they turned it over to the Delaware state police. He said 14 minutes worth of shit. Misinformation. 6 days before the election.

He whines about the iron curtain of big media not helping spread the "news". Why didn't Fox run those stories? They ran the lie about the Diebold machines that cost them $787 million, but they wouldn’t give Rudy time, why?

The laptop was used to prosecute Hunter for his firearm offense. Why not child pornography? What about the other half of the hard drive? Where are the payments to Joe? Reading emails and offering innuendo as proof is misinformation. Rudy didn't even offer a caveat.

Why do 60% of Republicans think the 2020 election was stolen? Who's winning the disinformation war? Complaining about those 51 is the equivalent to looking at the Palisades fire and complaining about your favorite celebrity's shrubs getting singed.
 
You said a link was even better. Watch it and tell me whether it was disinformation or not.

He offered the emails as proof. He said that it was full of child porn(SHAME) and they turned it over to the Delaware state police. He said 14 minutes worth of shit. Misinformation. 6 days before the election.

He whines about the iron curtain of big media not helping spread the "news". Why didn't Fox run those stories? They ran the lie about the Diebold machines that cost them $787 million, but they wouldn’t give Rudy time, why?

The laptop was used to prosecute Hunter for his firearm offense. Why not child pornography? What about the other half of the hard drive? Where are the payments to Joe? Reading emails and offering innuendo as proof is misinformation. Rudy didn't even offer a caveat.

Why do 60% of Republicans think the 2020 election was stolen? Who's winning the disinformation war? Complaining about those 51 is the equivalent to looking at the Palisades fire and complaining about your favorite celebrity's shrubs getting singed.
OK, I watched it. He doesn’t say anything about child porn. It says there were pictures of underage girls in the context of the “not a safe environment for kids” text that Hunter wrote.

He didn’t explicitly say anything about the photos being sexual in nature. He did say that he reported them to police and that any police officer who didn’t report them would be guilty of a felony. And that certainly implies they’re of a sexual nature. But he curiously stops short of actually labeling them as porn or sexual.

I’ll give you a half a point. That was very slippery.
 
I will say this I am surprised you don't agree with me. She was unarmed and had not attacked anyone physically. And that deserves death in your mind?
What about Oscar Grant? What about Brianna Taylor? What about George Floyd? It goes on and on. Are you are all up in arms about these unarmed Black Americans, who were actually trying to comply?

There are frankly too many unarmed Black Americans killed by the police to list here. And you all upset about this dumb white bitch who DID NOT COMPLY? Speaks for itself.

 
For context. Do you know the 51 were wrong?

Use common sense. Are they still claiming it’s true? Or is their lawyer saying they had a 1st amendment right to say what they did and used the “earmark” caveat?

So what do you think?

Besides, there were forensic analyses done on it - including this one commissioned by CBS News.

 
Use common sense. Are they still claiming it’s true? Or is their lawyer saying they had a 1st amendment right to say what they did and used the “earmark” caveat?

So what do you think?

Besides, there were forensic analyses done on it - including this one commissioned by CBS News.


One other thing I’d add to this.

What was found on the drive was evidence of foreign business deals benefitting Hunter Biden and James Biden.

Both of them have been back in the news in the past few weeks. Do you recall why?
 
OK, I watched it. He doesn’t say anything about child porn. It says there were pictures of underage girls in the context of the “not a safe environment for kids” text that Hunter wrote.

He didn’t explicitly say anything about the photos being sexual in nature. He did say that he reported them to police and that any police officer who didn’t report them would be guilty of a felony. And that certainly implies they’re of a sexual nature. But he curiously stops short of actually labeling them as porn or sexual.

I’ll give you a half a point. That was very slippery.
Thank you. I'll take it.
 
Use common sense. Are they still claiming it’s true? Or is their lawyer saying they had a 1st amendment right to say what they did and used the “earmark” caveat?

So what do you think?

Besides, there were forensic analyses done on it - including this one commissioned by CBS News.

I watched every second of your link. I think the laptop was authentic. I think the 51 had every right to counter the disinformation attempt, and had good reason to sign that statement. The caveat is important.

Do you agree that the Trump campaign was trying to spread disinformation before, during, and after the 2020 election?

Lev agrees.

Only the best people.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT