Remember unarmed
That has absolutely nothing to do with it. She deserved it.
Remember unarmed
by total arrests, noTrump freed more criminals with the stroke of a pen than have come through the border in the last year.
So we should have blown away all of the BLM rioters. They were dumb tooThat has absolutely nothing to do with it. She deserved it.
Like Trump? Or are you ignoring that since he's the golden idol you worship?Every employer who does this is also a criminal
Fair. But if you opened the door and waived them inside you would have no legal defense.
Depends on what you were protecting the BLM protestors from getting to. Were you blocking them from a large group of people that they were trying to actually kill, a group for whom you were specifically hired and trained to protect?So we should have blown away all of the BLM rioters. They were dumb too
As all good Christians would ...So we should have blown away all of the BLM rioters.
Think it through. You can do it! I believe in you!
So we should have blown away all of the BLM rioters. They were dumb too
I wonder how many times VPM has said "follow instructions if you don't want to get shot."As I recall, she climbed through a broken window into the Speaker's office and was warned by armed police not to do so. She disobeyed this order, continued the climbing, and was then shot.
Look, when police are in a volatile situation -- especially when they're outnumbered and feeling threatened -- you'd better follow every one of their orders carefully and slowly. If you don't, there's a pretty good chance you'll either get shot or hit with something less lethal.
I'm sure the cop who shot her didn't go looking for somebody to shoot that day. But she and the other marauders created that dangerous situation, not the police.
And all of this would apply to BLM rioters, too. If you're putting cops in a dangerous situation, it's not unlikely that they'll be using their weapons to protect themselves. I don't think they're considering the underlying cause of why people are rioting. Do you?
I wonder how many times VPM has said "follow instructions if you don't want to get shot."
This is going to be fun. I guess they have videos from inside the D.C. jail also coming. Let the lawsuits begin!
Bring in Cheney, Kinzinger, Epps, etc. Hook up the battery and jumper cables and find what they know and when they knew. You can’t plead the 5th if you’ve been pardoned. 😁This is going to be fun. I guess they have videos from inside the D.C. jail also coming. Let the lawsuits begin!
How do feel about the rioters who burned police stations and federal buildings and assaulted police officers and burned and looted private property. Yet no one has gone out of their way to find these guys.
A few months ago my daughter’s classmate wrecked the bathroom at their school. He sprayed his name WAS HERE on the wall.Those rioters were smart enough not to film each other doing damage and then uploading the vids to Facebook.
Jesus, what is with people these days? If I even stink up the joint more than I think is normal, I'll put on a Groucho Marx on the way out the door. Not going to put my goddamn signature on the wall.A few months ago my daughter’s classmate wrecked the bathroom at their school. He sprayed his name WAS HERE on the wall.
Makes her grades even more disappointing
Her school is a blast. It is so diverse. Black. White. Hispanic. Asian. Catholics. Jews. Rich kids. Poor kids. So much fun goes on up there. I think that’s part of her problem bc she’s easily distracted. So am I.Jesus, what is with people these days? If I even stink up the joint more than I think is normal, I'll put on a Groucho Marx on the way out the door. Not going to put my goddamn signature on the wall.
I wonder if she had been a Biden supporter people would mourn her loss.I wonder how many times VPM has said "follow instructions if you don't want to get shot."
I think you should stop wondering about other people and do some introspection.I wonder if she had been a Biden supporter people would mourn her loss.
You wouldn't.I wonder if she had been a Biden supporter people would mourn her loss.
I will say this I am surprised you don't agree with me. She was unarmed and had not attacked anyone physically. And that deserves death in your mind?I think you should stop wondering about other people and do some introspection.
I said at the time it was both tragic and justified. I stand by that. I did not say she "deserved" anything. I stand by that.I will say this I am surprised you don't agree with me. She was unarmed and had not attacked anyone physically. And that deserves death in your mind?
Sorry, @crazed_hoosier2 I just saw this. I will be happy to break it down with you. Please be patient. I admire your ability to write. Unfortunately, I will be slower to respond to each point.This post is a great demonstration of what I mean when I say that Donald Trump being the target has clouded people's judgment about it.
What does that matter? Something has either been properly vetted or it hasn't. And for intel pros to express a view on something that hasn't been properly vetted is reckless.
It doesn't become less reckless by complaining that they weren't given enough time. If they had properly vetted it (and weren't being disingenuous), they'd have never written that letter.
As DNI Ratcliffe pointed out at the time, they had no reason to believe the laptop was a Russian op.
What in the world does "contemporaneously accurate" mean?
They were wrong. Are you aware of something that was cited as having been pulled from the hard drive that was fabricated? Because you seem to be suggesting you are.
Whether or not the intel people knew what they were suggesting was false only they can say. That does matter -- it's the difference between knowingly lying and making a false declaration due to insufficient evidence. But the only two explanations here are dishonesty and irresponsibility. And neither one of them is good.
Did you notice that arguments their lawyer made are (a) they have a 1A right to say whatever they want (even if it's false) and (b) they included the words "all the classic earmarks of a Russian information operation" as a caveat?
While that's a tepid defense on its own, it seems important to note that the "earmarks" caveat was missing when their letter was cited by Joe Biden as proof that the laptop was a "Russian plant" and "garbage". Here....
Keep in mind when you watch that video two things: (1) Joe Biden almost certainly knew when he said it that the laptop was genuine...unless he was so derelict as to not even ask his own son about it, and (2) the genesis of the letter was his own campaign. Mike Morell has testified that he was approached by Antony Blinken about putting it out.
I'm certainly not defending anything and everything Donald Trump has ever said or claimed. I'm more than happy to call out his bullshit when he's spewing it. Have in the past, will in the future.
But, in this instance, what you're saying is precisely backwards. The laptop was authentic. And I'm not aware of anything that has been reported as coming from it that was not authentic. The Russians didn't have the first thing to do with it.
So, yes, the 51 intel vets are being punished for having propagated disinformation.....even if their defense is that they tacked on a disclaimer. The entire purpose of the letter was to provide cover for the Biden campaign and the media to denounce it as fraudulent.
But the laptop wasn't fraudulent. Their suggestion that it was a "Russian information operation" was.
If they can prove malfeasance on a large scale in the pursuit of these people, he should have waited until that was proven to issue pardons.
Donald Trump is not a victim of misinformation. Let's start there. The underlying October surprise was that there was evidence of a quid pro quo by the Biden's. Correct? That was the claim.This post is a great demonstration of what I mean when I say that Donald Trump being the target has clouded people's judgment about it.
This is going to be fun. I guess they have videos from inside the D.C. jail also coming. Let the lawsuits begin!
This is what really bothered people on the right. The DOJ launched their largest ever criminal probe into 1/6. Ever. That’s completely outrageous. For a protest that turned into a 2 hour riot.Rioters' $500 fine for burning down a Wendy's sparks outrage
Two people charged with burning down the restaurant in Atlanta in the summer of 2020 accepted plea deals.www.newsweek.com
The timing matters because the Trump October surprise was an attempt to disinform/lie about the contents of the laptop. They waited until October to sow confusion and discontent. Hoping that their claims would be disseminated by right-wing media without allowing time for a rebuttal.What does that matter? Something has either been properly vetted or it hasn't. And for intel pros to express a view on something that hasn't been properly vetted is reckless.
That's a Tip O'Neill quote.As Obama says elections have consequences.
Donald Trump is not a victim of misinformation. Let's start there. The underlying October surprise was that there was evidence of a quid pro quo by the Biden's. Correct? That was the claim.
The timing matters because the Trump October surprise was an attempt to disinform/lie about the contents of the laptop.
Let's say an angry mob shows up at your house chanting about how they want to kill your wife.She was unarmed
"A little more discerning." That's a good one.I wish Trump had been a little more discerning in handing out pardons and commutations.
Not a whole lot to glean from that video.