The Rule of Law - Federalism - Respect for Courts - Rabble

[MyTeamIsOnTheFloor]

Seems to be on the radar …. again

Shall we learn from history?

Are we entitled to ignore court decisions we do not like?

When? Where is that line? Is every decision we dislike a Dred Scott moment?

Should judges be loyal to their social justice views, or to the Constitution?

What is the proper road to protest a decision with which we disagree? “Burn, baby, burn” or “Brown v. Board of Education”?

Both? Would Brown exist without the Burn?

King and Marshall versus Seale and Cleaver?

The Letter From Birmingham Jail or BLM?

By today’s definitions offered by The Idiocracy, IKE was a white supremacist.



The Idiocracy need not respond. There is ice cream on the back porch. The adults will call you when supper is ready.

 

[MyTeamIsOnTheFloor]

Non-nuanced moment of Georgia GOP debate



PS - he said “wearin’ tires slam out” - not “slap out”

 

[MyTeamIsOnTheFloor]

Another defining moment- wonder why they edited out the best - “Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice! And let me remind you also that moderation in the pursuit of Justice is no virtue!”

 

[BradStevens]

Non-nuanced moment of Georgia GOP debate

View embedded media

PS - he said “wearin’ tires slam out” - not “slap out”

So the electorate shouldn’t have the benefit of a candidate’s responses to unscripted questions from the press?

I guess as a political stunt, it’s effective. And it shines a light on the farce of a notion that elections are decided by nuanced understanding of issues.

But that demeanor just doesn’t sit well with me.

 

[UncleMark]

Does the new Louisiana Ten Commandments law belong in this discussion?