Saw the Go-Go's three or four years back and she's looking very good even now. She's thin Belinda still. She kicked off her shoes at the start of the concert and was barefoot for the entire show. It was a good time.

How you like her feet now?
Saw the Go-Go's three or four years back and she's looking very good even now. She's thin Belinda still. She kicked off her shoes at the start of the concert and was barefoot for the entire show. It was a good time.
I only speak truth
Which is fine, but Jesus didn't command his followers to give their money to the poor until there were fewer poor. I'm starting to get really rather confused what your point is here, because it sounds dreadfully like you simply want religion to put a stamp of approval on your own economic preferences, and that's not going to happen.
But the church has never endorsed socialism. Not even Francis. He criticized the excesses of capitalism, for sure. But that is not the same as promoting socialism.Jesus did command his followers to give to the poor. Yes. The act of giving being an act of will.
He never advocated for what we today call wealth redistribution implemented by governments…the likes of which Pope Francis advocated.
There is zero scriptural basis for that.
And, no, I’ve never called on religion to put a stamp of approval on any economic model. In fact, that’s what I’m criticizing.
I never said he did.But the church has never endorsed socialism. Not even Francis. He criticized the excesses of capitalism, for sure. But that is not the same as promoting socialism.
I never said he did.
He promoted wealth redistribution within and between countries - which is not the same thing as socialism.
And my only two points on that are:
1) This doesn’t alleviate poverty, it enables it. And it makes no sense for the church or anybody else interested in reducing poverty to promote policies which do the opposite of that.
2) It has no scriptural basis. People confuse charity with redistribution all the time. And we shouldn’t - there are critical, meaningful differences.
there's always going to be an underclass. some people are lazy. prone to addiction. dumb. society has to bake that in. redistribution to me is less the question than outcomes. there's been a pivot in how we handle social welfare. clinton did a "better" job of means testing, dates certain for expiration etc. it's why jdb, the real jdb, was so poignant in saying the goal of doge shouldn't be fraud and waste per se. you won't find as much as you believe. the goal should be a proper vetting of programs and their OUTCOMES. the latter is what i have zero faith in joe biden, harris, aoc, etc. their mentality isn't to elevate it's instead to enable and to create dependency. they've gotten loose with their language and been caught in equity of outcomes and not opportunity. this iteration of hte left in my opinion is the most pressing threat to all that makes our country great that we've ever facedI don't know that it enables poverty. In 1928, we had no social programs, and 60% of Americans were earning below the poverty level. The poverty rate in the US today is about 11%. I would not argue that the gain is all because of income redistribution, but it seems equally likely that one can't say that without redistribution the number would be lower.
![]()
Why the Roaring Twenties Left Many Americans Poorer | HISTORY
For some, the Great Depression began in the 1920s.www.history.com
If he didn’t vote for President Trump he’ll forever be Pope RINO to a certain group.Interesting story below. Pope Leo, as Robert Prevost, reportedly voted in Republican primaries in 2012, 2014 and 2016. He didn’t vote in the general election in 2016 and 2020, but did so in 2024.
![]()
Is Robert Prevost a Republican? What we know
The new pope has been critical of President Trump in social media posts.www.newsweek.com
He was my heartthrob as a little girl! I’m Henry the 8th I am…..My iPad corrects everything. Maybe some phones and laptops don’t.
And there is some possibility he was referring to Peter Noone (which was corrected to “no one” before I berated it and changed it).
My grievance is with the constant changing of “well” to “we’ll”. Seems as if it should be the other way.
One of the tech experts will likely show me the easy way to correct/prevent that.
Hardly. Feet don’t do it for me. In fact, I was thinking the bottom of her feet were probably black with dirt. Feet don’t turn me on but dirty feet turn me off. My wife grew up in Hawaii and likes to go barefoot at times. I don’t like it. Not even in the kitchen!Huh, who knew Aloha has a foot fetish?
![]()
there's always going to be an underclass. some people are lazy. prone to addiction. dumb. society has to bake that in. redistribution to me is less the question than outcomes. there's been a pivot in how we handle social welfare. clinton did a "better" job of means testing, dates certain for expiration etc. it's why jdb, the real jdb, was so poignant in saying the goal of doge shouldn't be fraud and waste per se. you won't find as much as you believe. the goal should be a proper vetting of programs and their OUTCOMES. the latter is what i have zero faith in joe biden, harris, aoc, etc. their mentality isn't to elevate it's instead to enable and to create dependency. they've gotten loose with their language and been caught in equity of outcomes and not opportunity. this iteration of hte left in my opinion is the most pressing threat to all that makes our country great that we've ever faced
Hardly. Feet don’t do it for me. In fact, I was thinking the bottom of her feet were probably black with dirt. Feet don’t turn me on but dirty feet turn me off. My wife grew up in Hawaii and likes to go barefoot at times. I don’t like it. Not even in the kitchen!
Her being barefoot reflected her free spirit attitude on stage. She’d have to wash those feet immediately and thoroughly if we were getting together after the show. That would have been tricky since my wife was with me - and I don’t know Belinda.
In the USA IIRC the #1 cause of personal bankruptcy is a catastrophic disease diagnosis, such as cancer, with no or poor or highly combative health insurance providers who won't pay up.Not at all. As I said above, there are always going to be people who can’t be productive enough to earn enough income to satisfy their needs.
But I certainly don’t think that’s the case in a majority of instances. I think the biggest influences on outcomes are the things we do or don’t do - things within our control.
And there will also always be things like business failures...
Looks like the Cubs fan message was fake news.Ugh x 3. He’s a fricken Cubs fan!
OK, I am on board, NOW.Looks like the Cubs fan message was fake news
"Whoever said Cubs on the radio got it wrong. It's Sox,"
AKA, the Dream Team.there's always going to be an underclass. some people are lazy. prone to addiction. dumb.
Cocksmen
The fact that people bet on who will be the Pope concerns me, but I can’t put my finger on exactly why.I don't know anyhting about these papal hopefuls, but these four have the best betting odds of becoming the next pope:
- Pietro Parolin – 26 percent likelihood, with more than $1.1 million in bets.
- Luis Antonio Tagle – 20 percent, with $1.26 million wagered.
- Matteo Zuppi – 11 percent, with $837,000 in trading volume.
- Pierbattista Pizzaballa – 9 percent, with $861,000 wagered.
The fact that people bet on who will be the Pope concerns me, but I can’t put my finger on exactly why.
Did we bet on Billy Graham’s replacement?
This isn't the first time he's posted something without support.A new successor to Peter was announced today and presented to the world following an historic election. Pope Leo XIV is, by all accounts, a good, humble, brilliant and accomplished servant of the church. The fact that your singular reaction to his election consists of a quote equating the church with a whore is disgraceful. You’re an embarrassment, and I’m being kind.
Bet you are wrong...Betting on just about anything stirs up some hormones which excites them.
Sox. Cubs.Looks like the Cubs fan message was fake news.
He’s a Sox fan! Lookout, the Sox fortunes are about to turn! The Sox have connections in high places.
NBC Chicago's Christian Farr spoke to John Prevost, the Pope's brother, who lives in suburban New Lenox.
Contrary to the earlier reports, Prevost said that his brother is actually a White Sox fan, with his parents having split loyalty between the Cubs and Cardinals.
"Whoever said Cubs on the radio got it wrong. It's Sox," Prevost said.
NBC News has also confirmed from a Vatican spokesperson that the Pope roots for the South Siders.
He also has a history of spreading unfounded, ugly gossip and rumors about a couple of public figures. If he’s a pastor (which I doubt), that makes it worse.This isn't the first time he's posted something without support.
Nonetheless, if he is criticized on this board, he has supporters who vigorously defend him saying, "Leave him alone -- he uses 'pastor' in his username."
Virtually no one on this board knows his real background from anything other than what he posts. But, if you criticize what he posts, they still say, ""Leave him alone -- he uses 'pastor' in his username."
This isn't the first time he's posted something without support.
Nonetheless, if he is criticized on this board, he has supporters who vigorously defend him saying, "Leave him alone -- he uses 'pastor' in his username."
Virtually no one on this board knows his real background from anything other than what he posts. But, if you criticize what he posts, they still say, ""Leave him alone -- he uses 'pastor' in his username."
🤣🤣. Yes. This is his little scheme he concocted decades ago. Create the persona of an IU fan who worked at Wendy’s, attended moody Bible institute, and became a pastor in rural Pennsylvania who once a year splurges on gatti’s pizza on the drive home. 🤣He also has a history of spreading unfounded, ugly gossip and rumors about a couple of public figures. If he’s a pastor (which I doubt), that makes it worse.
In your first 3 cites, are you being too specific? Jesus told a rich man who loved his money - which was the one thing keeping him from giving his whole heart to God- to sell it all. that does not necessarily mean all Christians have to pledge to poverty. Your “one thing” might not be money. It could be wisdom. Or pride. Even human sexual intimacy and marriage.Matthew 19:21
Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go and sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come and follow me.
Mark 10:21
Jesus looked at him, loved him, and said to him, “There is one thing you lack: Go, sell everything you own and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me.”
Luke 18:22
On hearing this, Jesus told him, “You still lack one thing: Sell everything you own and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow Me.”
Luke 14:13-14
But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind, and you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you. For you will be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”
1 John 3:17-18
If anyone with earthly possessions sees his brother in need, but withholds his compassion from him, how can the love of God abide in him? / Little children, let us love not in word and speech, but in action and truth.
Jesus didn't describe the mechanism for distributing to the poor because no such mechanism would have existed. If you read Paul's letters, it was Paul and the Jerusalem Church playing the middle man of donating to the poor.
Sox. Cubs.
Is there any real difference?
“It’s a beautiful day. Let’s lose 2. And let’s throw the first one.”
Citation to the man "loved" his money and it "was the one thing keeping him from giving his whole heart to God?"In your first 3 cites, are you being too specific? Jesus told a rich man who loved his money - which was the one thing keeping him from giving his whole heart to God- to sell it all. that does not necessarily mean all Christians have to pledge to poverty. Your “one thing” might not be money. It could be wisdom. Or pride. Even human sexual intimacy and marriage.
The wedding feast and individual charity to individuals in need are different messages, and absolutely command Christians to practice charity and fight need and poverty, but again do not require everyone in the church to give it all away.
Right?
Titus 3:14, etc and so on …
What are the odds?Bet you are wrong...
His reaction to the pope’s election was a quote that he falsely attributed to St. Augustine that refers to the Church as a whore. That’s abhorrent, and hardly “pastoral.”🤣🤣. Yes. This is his little scheme he concocted decades ago. Create the persona of an IU fan who worked at Wendy’s, attended moody Bible institute, and became a pastor in rural Pennsylvania who once a year splurges on gatti’s pizza on the drive home. 🤣
How far removed from what we consider normal would you guess you two are? Doom and gloom
No one is stalking weirdo. It’s a thread. Miserable fck. Eat a bullet already. Do yourself and those around you a favorHis reaction to the pope’s election was a quote that he falsely attributed to St. Augustine that refers to the Church as a whore. That’s abhorrent, and hardly “pastoral.”
And stop stalking. It’s creepy as hell.
Honey could you come in hereHis reaction to the pope’s election was a quote that he falsely attributed to St. Augustine that refers to the Church as a whore. That’s abhorrent, and hardly “pastoral.”
And stop stalking. It’s creepy as hell.
Accurate portrayals of posters’ own lives isn’t exactly a hallmark (or goal, for that matter) of this little slice of the internets, Slick.Honey could you come in here
what’s up?
What do you think. Of my little scheme of portraying a pastor on an Indiana basketball forum?
Well. Uh. I.
Is there something that you’d ratherrrr be doing. Than working on my little scheme. Of portraying a pastor for decades on a basketball forum?
![]()