MAGA doesn't care for reach-arounds or kiddy fiddlers..Oh, we did. If MAGA hates him then he must be a really good person, because it's obvious they are terrible judges of character.
MAGA doesn't care for reach-arounds or kiddy fiddlers..Oh, we did. If MAGA hates him then he must be a really good person, because it's obvious they are terrible judges of character.
Soulless. The shark hath been jumped.And he damn well better stop this blasphemy of throwing the Mustang name on some god-awful and sinful EV. Mustang Boss 429 is heavenly.
I'll go with you on the open borders part -- if those retweets are any indication.
But...pro abortion? Where are you coming up with that?
I had heard it referred to Augustine.Nor did you demonstrate that Augustine said it.
Stop pointing the finger at others. You brought it up. So you prove it.
I am appalled that you would even contemplate that St. Augustine said such a thing. What kind of pastor are you? Read this and maybe you’ll learn something - it includes where that quote was fabricated and why it is so wrong.Who said it then?
And you stupidly assumed the attribution was correct without even pondering how absurd it was?I had heard it referred to Augustine.
I had heard it referred to Augustine.
Ok are you cognizant that others also attributed it to Augustine?And you stupidly assumed the attribution was correct without even pondering how absurd it was?
That there is no evidence to support the attribution means nothing to him.And you stupidly assumed the attribution was correct without even pondering how absurd it was?
Yes, the doctrines of mariology is one example. I would also point out the doctrine of Justification.Van, on the subject of referencing, is there a common belief that the Catholic church over the centuries has misinterpreted various passages of the Bible.
I agree with every bit of this post, but with prosperity gospel and evangelicals on the right being so prominent these days, I can see how a lot of people would consider Francis and others as socialists. And I am not in any way insinuating that crazed is in that camp. He’s not.So here's how I would put it. When the church - including Francis - criticize "capitalism," they aren't doing what you seem to think they are doing, which is attacking capitalism as a system. They are advocating for the people who get left behind. And that happens, in any economic system. Free markets might provide for a better overall result than other alternatives, but there are still winners and losers. No matter what economic system you have, there will be winners and losers. The church is understandably concerned with the plight of the losers.
And, of course, the church will set itself against greed, avarice, dishonesty, etc., that might be used to create losers. None of that should be taken as some sort of socialist manifesto. It's merely what we'd expect a religious movement that was concerned most with society's downtrodden from the very beginning to behave.
The responsible way to attribute something to someone is to cite the piece of writing in which the person said it. Instead of just saying, "Augustine said..." you say, "In The City of God, Part I, Book V, Augustine said..."Ok are you cognizant that others also attributed it to Augustine?
From what crazed has shared here about his own thoughts, I think it's safe to say, he's definitely not in that camp. But I do get the feeling that perhaps he is attributing to Francis, et al., an economic argument when they are really merely making a humanitarian argument.I agree with every bit of this post, but with prosperity gospel and evangelicals on the right being so prominent these days, I can see how a lot of people would consider Francis and others as socialists. And I am not in any way insinuating that crazed is in that camp. He’s not.
Which verses about Mary do you think the church has misinterpreted?Yes, the doctrines of mariology is one example. I would also point out the doctrine of Justification.
Catholics don’t believe in the prosperity gospel so I’m not sure the relevance of your comment.I agree with every bit of this post, but with prosperity gospel and evangelicals on the right being so prominent these days, I can see how a lot of people would consider Francis and others as socialists. And I am not in any way insinuating that crazed is in that camp. He’s not.
We have non-Catholics talking about the pope, so even Protestant theology is relevant in this particular avenue of discussion.Catholics don’t believe in the prosperity gospel so I’m not sure the relevance of your comment.
Evangelicals? wtf?
Lazy post.
Most all of my posts are lazy. I load manage myself on the Cooler. 😉What’s your point, because it had nothing to do with what we were talking about?Catholics don’t believe in the prosperity gospel so I’m not sure the relevance of your comment.
Evangelicals? wtf?
Lazy post.
So you’re on board with the idea that resistance to Francis’ critiques of capitalism was driven by prosperity gospel loving Evangelicals?We have non-Catholics talking about the pope, so even Protestant theology is relevant in this particular avenue of discussion.
Did you bother to read the link I posted? It explains where the false attribution came from. As others have asked, do you have something else? Apparently not since you refuse to provide anything.Yes, the doctrines of mariology is one example. I would also point out the doctrine of Justification.
Among Evangelicals, maybe.So you’re on board with the idea that resistance to Francis’ critiques of capitalism was driven by prosperity gospel loving Evangelicals?
Is this 25th in the greater Chicagoland area?127
Moody 25
The pope’s school didn’t even make vpm’s safety school list
Also, the Reformation is over. For centuries. In the real world today, large swaths of Protestants respect the Pope as one of the preeminent leaders of Christendom. One of the results of the ecumenical movement. So it's not exactly a surprise that more than just Catholics would have opinions on these topics.So you’re on board with the idea that resistance to Francis’ critiques of capitalism was driven by prosperity gospel loving Evangelicals?
Ah crap, how many times did VPM say "Moody Bible Institute" in this thread? Because I wasn't paying attention, and therefore I owe some drinks.127
Moody 25
The pope’s school didn’t even make vpm’s safety school list
A new successor to Peter was announced today and presented to the world following an historic election. Pope Leo XIV is, by all accounts, a good, humble, brilliant and accomplished servant of the church. The fact that your singular reaction to his election consists of a quote equating the church with a whore is disgraceful. You’re an embarrassment, and I’m being kind.I had heard it referred to Augustine.
Is this 25th in the greater Chicagoland area?
#15. Real deal. Community of religious scholarsIs this 25th in the greater Chicagoland area?
If I were going to attend a Christian college, it would have to be St. Olaf. How could any reasonable person ever choose anything other than St. Olaf? Martyred in battle against the Norse pagans. That's a man's way out.#15. Real deal. Community of religious scholars
![]()
2025 Moody Bible Institute Rankings
See where Moody Bible Institute ranks among top colleges in the U.S.www.niche.com
Is this better or worse than the school St. Peter attended?Chicago Theological Seminary Rankings and Evaluation
Discover Chicago Theological Seminary's Rankings and Evaluate it With Cost, Admission, and Academic Performance.www.collegeevaluator.com
Wow wow wow. Embarrassing
I could never get past their school fight song.If I were going to attend a Christian college, it would have to be St. Olaf. How could any reasonable person ever choose anything other than St. Olaf? Martyred in battle against the Norse pagans. That's a man's way out.
Why am I an embarrassment? I preach the Gospel and treat people right. I heard the new Pipe was a Cubs fan and thought it was coolA new successor to Peter was announced today and presented to the world following an historic election. Pope Leo XIV is, by all accounts, a good, humble, brilliant and accomplished servant of the church. The fact that your singular reaction to his election consists of a quote equating the church with a whore is disgraceful. You’re an embarrassment, and I’m being kind.
I did not read it. Must have missed itDid you bother to read the link I posted? It explains where the false attribution came from. As others have asked, do you have something else? Apparently not since you refuse to provide anything.
And again, it is utterly absurd to think that St. Augustine would have said such a thing. Absolutely unfathomable
Ok ne thing is the doctrine of the immaculate conception. Mary in her Magnificat claimed God as her Savior. So Mary was not sinless. Also Paul in Romans 3:23 would disagree with that doctrine because all have sinned except Jesus who was the God Man.Which verses about Mary do you think the church has misinterpreted?
That's fair. There are good theological reasons for the immaculate conception, but they certainly aren't backed specifically by scripture.Ok ne thing is the doctrine of the immaculate conception. Mary in her Magnificat claimed God as her Savior. So Mary was not sinless. Also Paul in Romans 3:23 would disagree with that doctrine because all have sinned except Jesus who was the God Man.
12 years of catholic school and all I remember were the beatings.If I were going to attend a Christian college, it would have to be St. Olaf. How could any reasonable person ever choose anything other than St. Olaf? Martyred in battle against the Norse pagans. That's a man's way out.
So here's how I would put it. When the church - including Francis - criticize "capitalism," they aren't doing what you seem to think they are doing, which is attacking capitalism as a system. They are advocating for the people who get left behind. And that happens, in any economic system. Free markets might provide for a better overall result than other alternatives, but there are still winners and losers. No matter what economic system you have, there will be winners and losers. The church is understandably concerned with the plight of the losers.
And, of course, the church will set itself against greed, avarice, dishonesty, etc., that might be used to create losers. None of that should be taken as some sort of socialist manifesto. It's merely how we'd expect a religious movement that was concerned most with society's downtrodden from the very beginning to behave.
But the thing is, the Pope isn't an economist. You're criticizing his economic theory; he doesn't have one. He's just saying, in the economic game of life, these people ended up on the bottom, so let's help them out.OK. But he declares a causal relationship between globalization and people going into poverty.
In other words, it’s true there are winners and losers in a market economy. But the losers aren’t losing because the winners are winning. And the winners aren’t winning at the expense of those losing.
His solution to this was wealth redistribution.
On Friday, Francis called for the United Nations to promote a "worldwide ethical mobilization" of solidarity with the poor in a new spirit of generosity.He said a more equal form of economic progress can be had through "the legitimate redistribution of economic benefits by the state, as well as indispensable cooperation between the private sector and civil society."
This is not a solution to poverty. It’s a recipe for extending and expanding it. We have known very well, for a long time, what things make a nation wealthier and what things make a nation poorer.
But thinking like his, which sounds appealing to many people, has nonetheless prevailed in many places and stood in the way of proper economic development.
Even Bono finally figured this out. China figured it out. Peter Bauer was explaining it decades ago - and got pilloried for it…because he denounced foreign aid.
But he was spot on correct.
And it all dates back to the guy who made up the story, as linked above.Ok are you cognizant that others also attributed it to Augustine?
It’s becoming increasingly evident that the guy who likes a quote that begins “the Church is a whore” is, in fact, an attention whore.And it all dates back to the guy who made up the story, as linked above.
Van, when you are shown to be factually wrong, the proper response is NOT to argue with the people who have corrected you.Ok are you cognizant that others also attributed it to Augustine?