So, about Chris Mack...
- Thread starter Bulk VanderHuge
- Start date
You've been outed. One of the reasons I know? People can't keep their mouths shut, do the same thing over and over and over again, and leave a trail.
I think I tried to have a real discussion with you once when you were pretending to have read a Supreme Court decision and have knowledge about a topic you were frothing at the mouth. If I'm looking for a real discussion, I'll look elsewhere.
I'd rather make the NCAAT. If we didn't make it and won the NIT I would enjoy the games because it's a couple more weeks of college basketball from the team I love.
I remember that discussion, your position was basically.
1. I'm a lawyer
2. I've read the Justice opinions, I believe you havent
3. I am not going to listen to you
Can you show me some evidence of these "trails" I've left behind? After all you are a lawyer supposedly it should be easy for you.
You are a joke.
More like you are ignorant on the topic, you have never read the pertinent Supreme Court cases, it isn't possible for me to engage in a real debate with you, and you should probably go educate yourself instead of opening your mouth and showing your ignorance. You sure can froth at the mouth, but can't sit down for 30-60 minutes and read an opinion.
I'm not pretending to be anything. Yet, I'm the joke? Interesting logic. Anywho, you've been outed.
You can believe I am whoever you want man, I've been on this board for years and I'll continue to be here.
Roe v. Wade was an overstep and a real lawyer would realize that.
But alas this is a basketball board and you have more aliases to hunt down.
Good night.
How would you know what a "real" lawyer is? You don't. Abortion involves competing interests, like most arguments that exist in the gray area. Apparently, you don't get this and think your opinions are fact instead of arguments. It isn't possible to be an attorney and write a legal opinion if you don't even understand what an argument is and what you have to balance. You would rather froth at the mouth than actually try to grasp the Supreme Court opinions.
You ask a serious question so I am going to try to give you a serious answer... un like some others here.
As a whole, I would rather the team I root for (Indiana) make the NCAAT and lose in the first round over winning NIT. So when I say "as a whole," I mean if we have been in the NCAA on a regular basis like should be for IU. However, right now it is better for IU to be playing in the NIT and get extra reps/practice/games for the young kids and the future versus being in and out so fast that it was forgotten. Hope this makes sense.
I think winning in the NIT has a much better impact on the team's outlook for next season compared to being upset in the first round of the NCAA. Not much to build on for u of l after being thrashed by UM.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Invitation_Tournament
Look at past champions...is that a list you long to frequent or strive for?
Is this sarcasm? He took a very mediocre roster to the tourney in the best conference his first year. Meanwhile we’re making excuses for missing the tourney Archie’s 2nd straight year with 2 all conference players. Get a clue man.
i would rather lose the first game in the ncaa. the excitement leading up to the game is irreplaceable. the enjoyment i would get for winning the nit would not come close
Last edited:
please don't refer to xavier as "the x" ever again. that's almost as bad as "the ville"
Similar threads
