I prefer all of our guys wear shoes.
Shoe Guys vs. Program Guys
- Thread starter MikeHoncho69
- Start date
Are you really this incompetent? I mean seriously.
The OAD rules affects HS players, not college freshmen. It would only affect the people who NEVER go to college. Plenty of kids are ready after a year in college with a good developmental program. Very few are ready right out of HS. That’s why very few went out of HS when it was allowed. Get a clue man.
Shocking you don’t know the difference between a senior in HS and a college freshman either. Try to catch up.
Archie may not either....hes getting very few HS seniors wanting to play for him...
Are you really this stupid? (Spoiler: Yes. Yes, you are.) Many of those HS seniors became college freshmen because of the rule. Sure, some of the freshmen that got drafted had breakout freshmen seasons but most would've gone pro right out of HS of if they had been allowed. You're an idiot if you truly believe that only 1/3 of the 48 players that got drafted in those three years at the earliest allowed time would have angered the draft right out of HS. You have it backwards, it would likely have been at least 2/3 of them going straight to the pros with 1/3 going to college for a year.
Even back in 2004 before the rule was implemented, 8 HS seniors were drafted. Since that time, NBA teams have become more and more willing to draft young players. Out affects way more than 5 players per year, you're just too daft to see that or admit it.
I’ve been extremely critical of Archie, but I’m going to assume he isn’t a dumba##. If he thought he had a good chance with more 5 stars he would offer them. He needs to recruit both 5 star players and 3 or 4 year players.
Last edited:
What's hilarious is that you think you are ahead of all those people who are actually lapping you.
Is a HS senior still the same as a college freshman to you?What's hilarious is that you think you are ahead of all those people who are actually lapping you.
I like this strategy, it can work.
And it may very well be IU's only course.
The one draw back I see, and this is just opinion, with the nature of college basketball today, is that those top 30 players out of high school, the ones who get all the media attention, also tend to get favorable treatment from the zebras.
And it may very well be IU's only course.
The one draw back I see, and this is just opinion, with the nature of college basketball today, is that those top 30 players out of high school, the ones who get all the media attention, also tend to get favorable treatment from the zebras.
Mary Ann was actually hotter than Ginger.
I think you can go either route and be successful (OAD or 40-125 ranked guys that stay in your program). But you have to do either route well and be consistent with it. Plenty of examples of both ways being successful in the modern era.
I think everyone likes Five Stars. Especially if they are difference makers as Freshman or two-year players. You can build nice teams around them. There is only two maybe three teams that can reload with multiple five stars, every year.
You would think so. But incredibly there are some on here who think we’d be better off never getting another 5 star.
Awwww shut up, ya douche bag. Seriously, every f******* word you type is just douche-laden bullshit. Ya “some” here will say anything but only the king of douches will argue against these straw men again and again and again and again...you are the Rain Man of douches... just f******* stop.
and it is this thread...
so you either didnt read it...or didn’t comprehend it...
Similar threads
