Don't worry, Chicago Fine. McMurtry will tell everybody what you were possibly trying to say.Metaphor
Don't worry, Chicago Fine. McMurtry will tell everybody what you were possibly trying to say.Metaphor
She's at least as much a political expert as Taylor Swift (not supporting Trump as he claimed) and Danica Patrick (voting for her first time).Why all the hatred for Page Steel? She's tremendous and very talented and many people are saying that she did some very nice things in her appearance alongside Stan Musial at the very highly attended Trump rally.
Trump's immigration stance is far firmer than that of the Bush's or Reagan.Wow. So you're saying that the Democrats' "malignant immigration and amnesty policies" have been going on since 2004, even when GWB was President?
Those sound like strange policies for a Republican President to implement. 🤣
Maybe so, but her extensive history of anti-Christian (particularly anti-Catholic) bias is there for all to see. I believe she went after Catholic Crisis pregnancy centers while in CA and she once questioned a Judicial nominee over his affiliation with the extremist group the "Knights of Columbus". And then she skips the Al Smith dinner and sends in a sketch mocking Catholics instead.It was a group of pro-life protesters who were being removed by security. Of course she said they were at the wrong rally. It had nothing to do with Jesus.
There's no maybe about it.Maybe so, but her extensive history of anti-Christian (particularly anti-Catholic) bias is there for all to see. I believe she went after Catholic Crisis pregnancy centers while in CA and she once questioned a Judicial nominee over his affiliation with the extremist group the "Knights of Columbus". And then she skips the Al Smith dinner and sends in a sketch mocking Catholics instead.
Kamala Harris’s Anti-Catholic Animus | National Review
The Democrats’ presumptive presidential nominee seems downright antagonistic toward Catholic beliefs, institutions, and people.www.nationalreview.com
Can we allow someone with this kind of prejudice anywhere near the oval?
Are pro-life adherents not welcome in the Democrat party? From the video I saw they didn't seem to be causing too much of a fuss.There's no maybe about it.
That's what kills me. If Harris is as bad as you all claim she is, why can't you limit your attacks to honest ones? Why make extra shit up? All you do by sharing the BS "Jesus is king" claim is cast doubt on all your other criticisms.
Apparently they were heckling the stage and bothering other attendees. How big the fuss was would be immaterial. They were going to get ejected.Are pro-life adherents not welcome in the Democrat party? From the video I saw they didn't seem to be causing too much of a fuss.
Honest attacks!?! Honesty isn't a MAGA thing.There's no maybe about it.
That's what kills me. If Harris is as bad as you all claim she is, why can't you limit your attacks to honest ones? Why make extra shit up? All you do by sharing the BS "Jesus is king" claim is cast doubt on all your other criticisms.
I’m watching a thing with walz talking about project 25 and trump. You think they are?Honest attacks!?! Honesty isn't a MAGA thing.
Come on man, give it up! What’s the number? 😂You're all about emotions. Look how upset you get because my IQ is very likely higher than yours. I know what mine is and the odds aren't in your favor.
And what I’ve said about you is objectively true. That you’re too stupid to recognize it is on you. The dishonesty you go on about with trump is in our face with Harris. She’s running ads during Monday night fball that trump will implement a national ban on abortion and project 2025 if elected. He has disavowed both a thousand times. Did you miss those ads? Or are you so emotionally vested in trump hate that you have blinders on?What I said about him is objectively true.
Every attack on Harris is dishonest and every attack on Trump is TRUTH. 🤦Honest attacks!?! Honesty isn't a MAGA thing.
Come on man, give it up! What’s the number? 😂
Not smartEvery attack on Harris is dishonest and every attack on Trump is TRUTH. 🤦
Don’t want to gloat.Come on man, give it up! What’s the number? 😂
Aloha is almost obsessive with his Trump hatred at this point, but you're an idiot if you think that means he's stupid. He's got twenty years of posting here that proves he's not stupid.And what I’ve said about you is objectively true. That you’re too stupid to recognize it is on you. The dishonesty you go on about with trump is in our face with Harris. She’s running ads during Monday night fball that trump will implement a national ban on abortion and project 2025 if elected. He has disavowed both a thousand times. Did you miss those ads? Or are you so emotionally vested in trump hate that you have blinders on?
You believe Trump? 😉 I also don’t watch political ads on TV.And what I’ve said about you is objectively true. That you’re too stupid to recognize it is on you. The dishonesty you go on about with trump is in our face with Harris. She’s running ads during Monday night fball that trump will implement a national ban on abortion and project 2025 if elected. He has disavowed both a thousand times. Did you miss those ads? Or are you so emotionally vested in trump hate that you have blinders on?
Aloha is almost obsessive with his Trump hatred at this point, but you're an idiot if you think that means he's stupid. He's got twenty years of posting here that proves he's not stupid.
Don't be like that.
@Aloha Hoosier obseesive hatred evinces emotion. To pretend otherwise is stupid. To feign like he’s emotionless is stupidAloha is almost obsessive with his Trump hatred at this point, but you're an idiot if you think that means he's stupid. He's got twenty years of posting here that proves he's not stupid.
Don't be like that.
To be serious for a moment, I don't think it is. I think we need more humility in this world.It’s okay to brag a little. 😂
No but I’m not driven by emotion. I can objectively recognize both candidates are liars 😉You believe Trump? 😉
He's not emotionless, but he's also not stupid.@Aloha Hoosier obseesive hatred evinces emotion. To pretend otherwise is stupid. To feign like he’s emotionless is stupid
You are absolutely driven by emotion. I've seen you go off on posters you have an emotional dislike for. Hell, I think Mark gave you a timeout for it once, you got so crazy. That was pure emotion on your part.No but I’m not driven by emotion. I can objectively recognize both candidates are liars 😉
We’ll have to disagree. It’s pretty stupid to pretend you’re not moved by emotions when you’re obsessedHe's not emotionless, but he's also not stupid.
Oh absolutely. But I can still objectively evaluate things. I can hate someone and recognize they’re still a better candidate. Maybe it’s law school training. I did get the highest grade in law and psychologyYou are absolutely driven by emotion. I've seen you go off on posters you have an emotional dislike for. Hell, I think Mark gave you a timeout for it once, you got so crazy. That was pure emotion on your part.
No, it just means you're not seeing clearly because of your emotions. That doesn't make you stupid. It means you lack objectivity on the issue at hand, for sure, but it doesn't mean you're stupid.We’ll have to disagree. It’s pretty stupid to pretend you’re not moved by emotions when you’re obsessed
I’ll accept his emotions are clouding his viewNo, it just means you're not seeing clearly because of your emotions. That doesn't make you stupid. It means you lack objectivity on the issue at hand, for sure, but it doesn't mean you're stupid.
I get it. I had the same kind of training. I got a 175 on my LSAT. Do you see me arguing cases before SCOTUS or making bank on CNN or Fox News? Scores and grades don't mean shit. They just show that you're good at filling in boxes.Oh absolutely. But I can still objectively evaluate things. I can hate someone and recognize they’re still a better candidate. Maybe it’s law school training. I did get the highest grade in law and psychology
I’ll also add that it reflects low self awareness to not recognize those emotions. People with low self awareness often overestimate their capabilities. The actual dunning-Kruger effectI’ll accept his emotions are clouding his view
No here I do believe coh is right. It does impact how you evaluate matters. How you think about things. How you represent people you don’t like or don’t like what they’ve done etc. training and practice.I get it. I had the same kind of training. I got a 175 on my LSAT. Do you see me arguing cases before SCOTUS or making bank on CNN or Fox News? Scores and grades don't mean shit. They just show that you're good at filling in boxes.
I don't have the same flowery view of legal training you guys have. I think you're deluding yourselves. I think scientists are better at thinking than we are. I mean, they are just as big of assholes, but I think their thought process is superior.No here I do believe coh is right. It does impact how you evaluate matters. How you think about things. How you represent people you don’t like or don’t like what they’ve done etc. training and practice.
If we’re being serious, I agree.To be serious for a moment, I don't think it is. I think we need more humility in this world.
It’s training coupled with practice. Thousands of clients of all types. Contested matters. Depos. Conflict. Stress. Presenting trial shit. How to present based on the circumstancesI don't have the same flowery view of legal training you guys have. I think you're deluding yourselves. I think scientists are better at thinking than we are. I mean, they are just as big of assholes, but I think their thought process is superior.
Both should try honesty. There’s plenty of harmful truth out there. 👍🏽Every attack on Harris is dishonest and every attack on Trump is TRUTH. 🤦
And your success in those matters is always judged by people who went through the same training you did. Whoop-dee-f*cking-doo.It’s training coupled with practice. Thousands of clients of all types. Contested matters. Depos. Conflict. Stress. Presenting trial shit. How to present based on the circumstances
I’ve deposed over 200 doctors. No chance if we include them as scientists. Very narrow thinking
Not in the least. It’s judged by clients who don’t have that trainingAnd your success in those matters is always judged by people who went through the same training you did. Whoop-dee-f*cking-doo.
I agree. Scientists are the best. Engineers are right there too.I don't have the same flowery view of legal training you guys have. I think you're deluding yourselves. I think scientists are better at thinking than we are. I mean, they are just as big of assholes, but I think their thought process is superior.
Bullshit. Those clients are simply happy you got the judgment they wanted from other people who did have that training.Not in the least. It’s judged by clients who don’t have that training
When I rag on legal training I do so in the context of running a business. It’s very different and of little aid. But legal training and practice absolutely trains your brain to think differently. On that I agree with cohAnd your success in those matters is always judged by people who went through the same training you did. Whoop-dee-f*cking-doo.
I mean, I wouldn't go that far.I agree. Scientists are the best.