ADVERTISEMENT

Rejoice lefties Speaker Johnson’s new spending bill

TyWebbIU

Sophomore
Feb 4, 2015
992
918
93
-allows for vaccine and mask mandates
-vaccine passports
-expanded emergency powers
-gain of function research
-40% pay raise for Congress
-allows members of Congress to escape Obamacare exchanges
-funds 1 yr extension of State Departments Global Engagement Center. The nexus of the Censorship Industrial Complex.
-gives blanket immunity for Congress
-takes $200B from social security for other spending

 
  • Wow
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Shouldn't you're ire be directed at the folks you vote for and not lefties? This would be expected from the left, no? "Congrats water on being wet!!".

Conservatives are supposed to be the counter to progressives. Help reign in spending. But you all haven't voted many actual conservatives into office in like 25 years. Spending has been as bad or worse under Republican leadership.
 
Shouldn't you're ire be directed at the folks you vote for and not lefties? This would be expected from the left, no? "Congrats water on being wet!!".

Conservatives are supposed to be the counter to progressives. Help reign in spending. But you all haven't voted many actual conservatives into office in like 25 years. Spending has been as bad or worse under Republican leadership.
Uniparty wins again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
-allows for vaccine and mask mandates
-vaccine passports
-expanded emergency powers
-gain of function research
-40% pay raise for Congress
-allows members of Congress to escape Obamacare exchanges
-funds 1 yr extension of State Departments Global Engagement Center. The nexus of the Censorship Industrial Complex.
-gives blanket immunity for Congress
-takes $200B from social security for other spending

My understanding is that the vote was 212-212, Johnson voted to pass.
Non reach-around Republicans didn't vote for Swampy Johnson as Speaker for just this reason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TyWebbIU
My understanding is that the vote was 212-212, Johnson voted to pass.
Non reach-around Republicans didn't vote for Swampy Johnson as Speaker for just this reason.

Nothing has even been voted on... WTF are you are talking about?


What Republicans didn't vote for Johnson for Speaker?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
-allows for vaccine and mask mandates
-vaccine passports
-expanded emergency powers
-gain of function research
-40% pay raise for Congress
-allows members of Congress to escape Obamacare exchanges
-funds 1 yr extension of State Departments Global Engagement Center. The nexus of the Censorship Industrial Complex.
-gives blanket immunity for Congress
-takes $200B from social security for other spending

-0JAP9.gif
 
My understanding is that the vote was 212-212, Johnson voted to pass.
Non reach-around Republicans didn't vote for Swampy Johnson as Speaker for just this reason.
A hand full of MAGA Moron RINO Republicans voted against him last year. His support this year was unanimous from Republicans to retain the job. The MAGA Morons in the House aren't the solution, they're the problem.
 
-allows for vaccine and mask mandates
-vaccine passports
-expanded emergency powers
-gain of function research
-40% pay raise for Congress
-allows members of Congress to escape Obamacare exchanges
-funds 1 yr extension of State Departments Global Engagement Center. The nexus of the Censorship Industrial Complex.
-gives blanket immunity for Congress
-takes $200B from social security for other spending

That would be bad if it was true.
 
  • Like
Reactions: outside shooter
Trump said yesterday that he would consider eliminating the debt ceiling. Hmm. Not very "conservative" of him.
There's a case to be made for ignoring the debt ceiling, that the spending authorization effectively is what determines the debt and the ceiling is an artificial construct that can't limit the power of Congress to spend money.
 
There's a case to be made for ignoring the debt ceiling, that the spending authorization effectively is what determines the debt and the ceiling is an artificial construct that can't limit the power of Congress to spend money.
I think it's a strong case. Unfortunately, it's a political loser because people are idiots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UncleMark
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT