It does blow up 2 of the things he loves to say:
1) Miller can't land talent from out of state. He ignores that Hunter, Thompson, and Forrester were all 4* from out of state. Hunter was top 50, Thompson top 100 (I think 70ish?), and Forrester was a 3* on 247 composite but a 4* according to Rivals (which is the only ranking he'll count - but only when it is in favor of his argument so he ignores it in this case)
2) Miller can't land 5*/high 4* talent. Ignoring, of course, Langford and TJD.
I'm sure he'll argue against some of those using hindsight which is always 20/20 but that doesn't change the fact that they were ranked 4* or higher and some from out of state.