Duke, UL and either Ark or Marquette out of conference, the balance in the conference. 20-11 seems about right, if not a little optimistic based on the experience level of too many players who will have to contribute.
With a team as young as IU will be, nearly every road game will be an adventure, regardless of the opponent. I understand the irrational exuberance, but I’m very comfortable with my prediction. Too many people to replace.
Arkansas has 8 freshman. 4 soph. 1 junior. Only one returning player played 20+.
By the end of the season Phinesee and Durham should be ready at PG. And IU has Franklin coming in next season at PG/Combo guard. No more PG debacles like Crean left for Archie.
If Romeo doesn’t have to play more than a couple of minutes at the point each game, it means DeVonte and Rob are playing really well. If that’s the case, this is def a 20-25 win team pre-BTT. I love the quality depth up front, including Morgan, Fitzner, Smith and Race, even if Davis is way behind. In the long run, Morgan and Romeo could be one of the best offensive combos IU has had. Other than January, we have a very favorable schedule as well.
They’ve turned over half the team, and that youth and inexperience will make for some challenges, particularly on the road in the BiG 10. Talent is great, but experience is invaluable.
The thread title is “Prediction for upcoming season”, which is precisely what I offered (and nothing else).
A prediction offered with certitude isn’t and shouldn’t be viewed as inconsistent or inappropriate, as you seem to believe. Though, upon reflection, perhaps not offering any sort of prediction defines a true lack of certitude. Or expertise. Or both.
No, your analog doesn’t fit in the least. Those unwilling to fire their guns might be able to nonetheless shoot, but there’s no evidence whatsoever that they actually can. It’s about walking the talk.
You’ve once again failed to grasp the point. It’s not that one isn’t qualified to offer an opinion but rather they lack standing to offer criticism of the opinions of others given their inability or unwillingness or fear to offer same. As for a wager, you’re still unable to offer an opinion, so your request carries absolutely no validity. Or certitude.
The “dodge” is your inability / unwillingness to make your opinion explicit, and I’m wagering that you’ll continue to duck. That’s the sole obfuscation on display here, even as you disingenuously and futility attempt to wiggle off the hook. Not sure of what you’re so very fearful.
What’s their record going to be? C’mon, stop trying to wiggle away. What are you afraid of? I knew you’d take a pass.
As we suspected, your sole purpose was to initiate a confrontation rather than talk hoops. That, as you’ve now admitted, is the only thing that’s been outed here. Hardly a surprise if your recent posting history is any indicator.
