Polls - - a week out
- Thread starter Bowlmania
- Start date
Call it whatever the hell you want. The experts lied to affect the election. Any economist supporting a candidate right now is biased in their assessments of the candidates policies.
How the hell do you assess Kamala’s policies when she changes them with the wind? How did they assess the effect of taxing unrealized gains? How the fck do you assess the effect including time and money costs for Americans to value their properties once a year? Anyone proposing something so ignorant should never be president.
She’s worse than Hilary. I’ve been telling you that for years. She was only put into VP for one reason.
Not to mention the 20 percent pass through that she will let expire. Those of us with businesses are going to get whacked here. I guarantee that impacts a ton of your clients. It sure as hell impacts me and my partners in a huge way
You’re the Fing nut job. On here acting like your opinion matters. What’s worse you’re barely literate. Data all wrong. Bloodbath. Good grief. No one tags you for fun. No one one jokes with you. Just a miserable human.
But if you want to talk to me post to me.
IFGAF what you call me…. Your trash talk to Bowl is way over the top. But you ruin every thread on these boards with your repetitive BS.
No you want to dish it out but can’t take a response. I didn’t post at you. You came out attacking. Put on your big boy pants
No different than bowl calling crazed condescending in this thread. No need. But do it expect a response.
I think it is very plausible that independent voters or even long-time GOPers would vote for Harris because they are Never Trumpers. Supporting Harris and hating Trump are two different things, even if the end result is the same.
Meanwhile, you still haven’t answered the question. And it’s anonymous so why can’t you state your opinions? I’ve long expressed where i differ from each party. Too many people claim to be independents or even GOPers who won’t vote for Trump, but have yet to articulate any support for conservative views.
Hypocrites. They often start the shit then act surprised when people stick it up their ass
Correct. One was James Clyburn.
Two was Biden was old and senile so he needed someone even more incompetent than he is so they wouldn't remove him.
The 20% Net Business Income Deduction is enormous. I’ve been warning my business clients for the last two years.
“Nutjobs” are in the eyes of the beholder in here.
Here’s a test. Biden is on a recorded speech calling Trump Supporters (plural) Garbage. Now the WH which includes Kamala are saying it was singular. Now the test. Are they fcking liars or telling the truth?
The reason McMurtry’s posts bother you so much is you can’t refute them.
It’s on video and these bastards think they can change what was said. They are the worst fcking humans on this entire planet!
Very plausible. The never Trumpers see him as a threat to democracy(I'm not arguing the validity, just stating their personal perception). One that will cause lasting and maybe irreversible damage to our institutions. Where they see Harris as just another progressive Dem. Any policy she happens to get passed(non of the extreme ones have a chance BTW) can just be overturned or reformed in 4 years. So they are going with the lesser of two evils in their minds.
Logic I would somewhat understand if things they push forward are ever legislated back out. The instances of that occurring are so rare that none jump to mind.
There is an argument from some in the conservative community that they can't support the current trajectory of the party because it has become too reactionary. My question to them would be, so all that stuff you supported 20 years ago before it got bulldozed over was just bullshit or are you just really so contrarian that your political position is to just stop here? If they pick you up and move you 20 feet? Well let's stop here. They take you from a place you like and drop you someplace you don't? Well, let's stop here and I will write an article "A conservative case for why I should want to be here instead of back there."
It is literally why the populists are in control of the party right now.
I disagree.
Very plausible.
Understood. Same with a Pub, if Trump cedes the presidency.
Last edited:
I lean left, but Biden saying that was so dumb and was on the same plain as what was said at Trumps rally.
Neither should be accepted. Anyone complaining about one and not the other is a hypocrite to the highest degree.
Again, every single one of the entities you mentioned were Republicans, and the Govt were GOP. FBI,DOJ and others are POLITICAL appointment. That means they were nominated/put in place by Trump and are basically out of a job if he loses...
What incentive does your conspirance addled brain think they had to want Trump (AND THEIR JOBS) to lose?
Can you please go repost this in the thread I started for MAGA celebrations? It's precisely the type of input I was hoping to inspire...
Holding my nose on Harris, I still hope you are right. But I think it will be Trump.
Question for you and the few other reasonable people on this board (both sides). Let's say the night of the election Trump declares himself winner before results are in. Or perhaps preemptively says he was cheated.
Are those things that would be a bridge too far? I already know how you feel about Harris. 😁
So I see that some here including a mod think that calling someone a fraud is = throwing out every nasty 4 letter epithet there is. Civility rules
no bc i still am moved by policies and what party will have a more deleterious impact on all of us. i also know that the systems in place won't allow trump to cheat and win. jan 6 i don't "excuse" but i do understand that i think it was somewhat impulsive and things got out of hand. the more damning evidence to me, without following this stuff to closely, was trump's phone call to "find him votes." i guess that was georgia with the dipshit prosecutor. but ultimately i wouldn't be surprised in the least if trump claims victory. i do believe our system will ensure the actual winner is in office
Harris shouldn’t be held responsible for what Biden said and Trump shouldn’t be responsible for what a comedian said. BUT the Dems held Trump responsible. What’s good for the goose is good for the gander.
Similar threads
