ADVERTISEMENT

Politico: Roe to be overturned per draft opinion

The only that bugs me there are the Cole Haans with the white soles. Can't get there man. Can't do it.
Those white bottoms represent freedom and speed. Run right out of that office to happy hour where you seamlessly slip into casual mode.

Like white shoes in soccer. You show up for a pickup game and see a guy in white cleats he's either going to be foreign or a baller
 
  • Haha
Reactions: larsIU
Biden by way of Psaki apparently has no problem protesting in front of people's' homes. Despicable.
I Was thinking about the precedents The White House is setting. It's okay to leak, it's okay to protest in front of your private residence even if its prohibited by law, It's okay to use any tactic you want to attempt to undermine a branch of government. "What goes around... "
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: DANC
Appreciate the offer but I was able to find streams of it so, you can stop giving D'Sousa your money.

I started it to make sure it was the program. The only surprise was his tone. I figured it would be fire and brimstone rally cries but, at least at the start, he was asking questions. Not like how Tucker asks questions which are dripping with rhetorical sleaze and heavy winks....so I was pleased with that.

I'll get to it eventually but going to finish up Yellowstone first.

That being said, the movie was completely debunked immediately after it was released.

Basically for the same reasons every republican judge laughed it out of court....the evidence is extremely weak.

Mainly the big 'ah ha' is using cellphone tracking data, which isn't precise enough to hold up in court.

Secondly it's based on if a cell phone number drove by a ballot drop box ten times in a month. Ummm drop boxes are placed in areas of convenience, like near places that people go to.

So ask yourself, when a person goes by a drop box ten times in a month is it because they are getting coffee? Going to the bank? Going to work? Or they are secret voting ballot mules dropping off tens of thousands of illegal ballots?

That's just one major fallacy of a huge list.

But that's not the purpose of the movie. It's purpose is to get people who already believe to spend money.

As mentioned before, Fox and Newsmax aren't giving it one thought. That alone speaks volumes.

https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...-gaping-holes-in-the-claim-of-2k-ballot-mules
I guess you haven't got to the part where he uses video to confirm visits to the drop boxes.

"That being said, the movie was completely debunked immediately after it was released."

Debunked by whom?
 
Hey cmon I know you can be creative here. Watcha got?

Fire Hose? I was thinking powerwashers.

How bout some black cats with the ole white stripe on the back released into the crowd. Skunk...LOL

Some gas powered micro trucks with firecrackers.
Whatever you guys are into now.
 
And those people were charged with crimes.

Let me know the next time someone was arrested for threatening a Federal judge.
Who is threatening a federal judge? Also, why do you have to be so disrespectful to other posters? I have put you on ignore like twice. I hope you understand how negative you come across to others when you just go after other posters and call them names.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Who is threatening a federal judge? Also, why do you have to be so disrespectful to other posters? I have put you on ignore like twice. I hope you understand how negative you come across to others when you just go after other posters and call them names.
Do you watch the news? Do you realize there are people protesting in front of judge's houses?

Do you live under a rock?

I don't really care how I come across to anyone who refuses to acknowledge laws, so go ahead and put me on ignore again. That's one less ignorant reply from you I have to read.
 
Do you watch the news? Do you realize there are people protesting in front of judge's houses?

Do you live under a rock?

I don't really care how I come across to anyone who refuses to acknowledge laws, so go ahead and put me on ignore again. That's one less ignorant reply from you I have to read.
Ummmm....you do understand that protesting and threatening are not synonyms, right?
 
Do you watch the news? Do you realize there are people protesting in front of judge's houses?

Do you live under a rock?

I don't really care how I come across to anyone who refuses to acknowledge laws, so go ahead and put me on ignore again. That's one less ignorant reply from you I have to read.
The 1st Amendment allows people to engage in free speech: that is far from threatening a federal judge.

You wouldn't speak to people this way in real life, so why do it here? Why so angry?
 
  • Like
Reactions: brianiu
OK, let me come to your house and yell and scream and insult you and we'll see if you feel threatened.

Just trying to influence the judgement of a Federal judge is a crime. Surely you know that, right?
Apparently liberals have a hard time understanding that. Just trying to influence is a crime and what other reason would you be protesting outside their homes? Seeing if you could mow their lawn for them?
 
OK, let me come to your house and yell and scream and insult you and we'll see if you feel threatened.

Just trying to influence the judgement of a Federal judge is a crime. Surely you know that, right?
You were specifically talking about criminal threats. Protesting does not qualify.

For reasons others have already explained, protesting does not qualify as undue influence, either.

Take this for what it's worth, DANC, but a lot of your food fights could be avoided if you simply were more careful with your language, instead of sloppily jumping from one thing to another to another and acting like they are all part of the same thing.
 
You were specifically talking about criminal threats. Protesting does not qualify.

For reasons others have already explained, protesting does not qualify as undue influence, either.

Take this for what it's worth, DANC, but a lot of your food fights could be avoided if you simply were more careful with your language, instead of sloppily jumping from one thing to another to another and acting like they are all part of the same thing.
Explain what the purpose of protesting in your world is, if not to try and influence a judge? This should be good
 
  • Like
Reactions: Joe_Hoopsier
Explain what the purpose of protesting in your world is, if not to try and influence a judge? This should be good
It's probably primarily about shouting to the world about how angry they are. Maybe some of them think they can influence the judges in question, although I doubt it. Even if they think they can, that's not a crime, any more than it's a crime for lawyers to influence judges by making good arguments in court.
 
The 1st Amendment allows people to engage in free speech: that is far from threatening a federal judge.

You wouldn't speak to people this way in real life, so why do it here? Why so angry?
There's no way you're a lawyer.



I'm not angry, but I am upset at the lack of interest here in honestly discussing this administration and it's refusal to enforce the law equally.

Yes, I would speak to people this way in real life. You don't know me at all.
 
There's no way you're a lawyer.



I'm not angry, but I am upset at the lack of interest here in honestly discussing this administration and it's refusal to enforce the law equally.

Yes, I would speak to people this way in real life. You don't know me at all.
Yes, if any of those protesters threatens to assault, murder, or kidnap a judge, that would indeed be a crime.
 
There's no way you're a lawyer.



I'm not angry, but I am upset at the lack of interest here in honestly discussing this administration and it's refusal to enforce the law equally.

Yes, I would speak to people this way in real life. You don't know me at all.
You are extremely disrespectful to people that you don't know: I'm guessing the anonymity of the internet has embolden you to do so. Don't treat people on the internet the way you would not treat them in real life.

Influence under criminal law does not mean what you think it means: go take a criminal law class, read a criminal law book, etc. Check out the 1st Amendment while you are at it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aloha Hoosier
You were specifically talking about criminal threats. Protesting does not qualify.

For reasons others have already explained, protesting does not qualify as undue influence, either.

Take this for what it's worth, DANC, but a lot of your food fights could be avoided if you simply were more careful with your language, instead of sloppily jumping from one thing to another to another and acting like they are all part of the same thing.
How about if I and 50 of my friends stand outside your house, with your spouse and kids inside, and shout "Goat is an asshole who wants to destroy my life". And did it every night.

You'd have a whole different presepective on what is considered influencing.

I'll take your advice for what it's worth - nothing.

Since I've come on here, I've been subjected to name calling and ridicule. I don't care - I knew what this place was before I started posting. Go back to my original posts here and you can see I didn't respond in kind until Mods like you didn't do anything to stop it from happening to me. So, I respond in kind and now you're whining about it.

Why do I want to avoid 'food fights'? I'm not arguing with myself. If you don't want to get into a food fight with me, don't fling food at me. Pretty simple.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT